Macular thickness and retinal nerve fiber thickness analysis in ocular dominance
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2018 |
Other Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online) |
Download full: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802018000600316 |
Summary: | Abstract Objective: To compare macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses of dominant eye and non-dominant eye using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: 104 eyes of 52 healthy young adults were included. Ophthalmological examinations; including measuring refraction, best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, slit-lamb biomicroscopy, dilated fundus examination, measuring of central macular thickness (CMT), and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (PRNFL) thickness were performed on each subject. Hole-in-the-card test was used to detect the ocular dominance. Results: There were 25 females (48%) and 27 males (52%) in the study. Eight participants had left eye dominance (15%), forty-four participants had right eye dominance (85%). Mean CMT was 192.5µm in dominant group and 191.9 µm in non-dominant group. There was no statistically significant difference between dominant eye group and non-dominant eye group in either macular thickness or peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Conclusions: No difference between macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses were detected in dominant and non-dominant groups. Further evaluation is needed. |
id |
SBO-1_1fd51736dd5c8b81f7e4cbacb4b1a2a4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0034-72802018000600316 |
network_acronym_str |
SBO-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Macular thickness and retinal nerve fiber thickness analysis in ocular dominanceMacula lutea/anatomy & histologyRetinaNerve fibersDominance, ocularAbstract Objective: To compare macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses of dominant eye and non-dominant eye using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: 104 eyes of 52 healthy young adults were included. Ophthalmological examinations; including measuring refraction, best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, slit-lamb biomicroscopy, dilated fundus examination, measuring of central macular thickness (CMT), and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (PRNFL) thickness were performed on each subject. Hole-in-the-card test was used to detect the ocular dominance. Results: There were 25 females (48%) and 27 males (52%) in the study. Eight participants had left eye dominance (15%), forty-four participants had right eye dominance (85%). Mean CMT was 192.5µm in dominant group and 191.9 µm in non-dominant group. There was no statistically significant difference between dominant eye group and non-dominant eye group in either macular thickness or peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Conclusions: No difference between macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses were detected in dominant and non-dominant groups. Further evaluation is needed.Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802018000600316Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia v.77 n.6 2018reponame:Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO)instacron:SBO10.5935/0034-7280.20180068info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCevher,SelimKocluk,YusufCetinkaya,SavasSukgen,Emine Alyamaceng2019-02-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-72802018000600316Revistahttps://rbo.emnuvens.com.br/rbo/indexhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpsob@sboportal.org.br||rbo@sboportal.org.br1982-85510034-7280opendoar:2019-02-01T00:00Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Macular thickness and retinal nerve fiber thickness analysis in ocular dominance |
title |
Macular thickness and retinal nerve fiber thickness analysis in ocular dominance |
spellingShingle |
Macular thickness and retinal nerve fiber thickness analysis in ocular dominance Cevher,Selim Macula lutea/anatomy & histology Retina Nerve fibers Dominance, ocular |
title_short |
Macular thickness and retinal nerve fiber thickness analysis in ocular dominance |
title_full |
Macular thickness and retinal nerve fiber thickness analysis in ocular dominance |
title_fullStr |
Macular thickness and retinal nerve fiber thickness analysis in ocular dominance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Macular thickness and retinal nerve fiber thickness analysis in ocular dominance |
title_sort |
Macular thickness and retinal nerve fiber thickness analysis in ocular dominance |
author |
Cevher,Selim |
author_facet |
Cevher,Selim Kocluk,Yusuf Cetinkaya,Savas Sukgen,Emine Alyamac |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kocluk,Yusuf Cetinkaya,Savas Sukgen,Emine Alyamac |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cevher,Selim Kocluk,Yusuf Cetinkaya,Savas Sukgen,Emine Alyamac |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Macula lutea/anatomy & histology Retina Nerve fibers Dominance, ocular |
topic |
Macula lutea/anatomy & histology Retina Nerve fibers Dominance, ocular |
description |
Abstract Objective: To compare macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses of dominant eye and non-dominant eye using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: 104 eyes of 52 healthy young adults were included. Ophthalmological examinations; including measuring refraction, best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, slit-lamb biomicroscopy, dilated fundus examination, measuring of central macular thickness (CMT), and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (PRNFL) thickness were performed on each subject. Hole-in-the-card test was used to detect the ocular dominance. Results: There were 25 females (48%) and 27 males (52%) in the study. Eight participants had left eye dominance (15%), forty-four participants had right eye dominance (85%). Mean CMT was 192.5µm in dominant group and 191.9 µm in non-dominant group. There was no statistically significant difference between dominant eye group and non-dominant eye group in either macular thickness or peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Conclusions: No difference between macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses were detected in dominant and non-dominant groups. Further evaluation is needed. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802018000600316 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802018000600316 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5935/0034-7280.20180068 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia v.77 n.6 2018 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO) instacron:SBO |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO) |
instacron_str |
SBO |
institution |
SBO |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
sob@sboportal.org.br||rbo@sboportal.org.br |
_version_ |
1752122338342600704 |