Macular thickness and retinal nerve fiber thickness analysis in ocular dominance

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cevher,Selim
Publication Date: 2018
Other Authors: Kocluk,Yusuf, Cetinkaya,Savas, Sukgen,Emine Alyamac
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online)
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802018000600316
Summary: Abstract Objective: To compare macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses of dominant eye and non-dominant eye using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: 104 eyes of 52 healthy young adults were included. Ophthalmological examinations; including measuring refraction, best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, slit-lamb biomicroscopy, dilated fundus examination, measuring of central macular thickness (CMT), and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (PRNFL) thickness were performed on each subject. Hole-in-the-card test was used to detect the ocular dominance. Results: There were 25 females (48%) and 27 males (52%) in the study. Eight participants had left eye dominance (15%), forty-four participants had right eye dominance (85%). Mean CMT was 192.5µm in dominant group and 191.9 µm in non-dominant group. There was no statistically significant difference between dominant eye group and non-dominant eye group in either macular thickness or peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Conclusions: No difference between macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses were detected in dominant and non-dominant groups. Further evaluation is needed.
id SBO-1_1fd51736dd5c8b81f7e4cbacb4b1a2a4
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-72802018000600316
network_acronym_str SBO-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Macular thickness and retinal nerve fiber thickness analysis in ocular dominanceMacula lutea/anatomy & histologyRetinaNerve fibersDominance, ocularAbstract Objective: To compare macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses of dominant eye and non-dominant eye using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: 104 eyes of 52 healthy young adults were included. Ophthalmological examinations; including measuring refraction, best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, slit-lamb biomicroscopy, dilated fundus examination, measuring of central macular thickness (CMT), and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (PRNFL) thickness were performed on each subject. Hole-in-the-card test was used to detect the ocular dominance. Results: There were 25 females (48%) and 27 males (52%) in the study. Eight participants had left eye dominance (15%), forty-four participants had right eye dominance (85%). Mean CMT was 192.5µm in dominant group and 191.9 µm in non-dominant group. There was no statistically significant difference between dominant eye group and non-dominant eye group in either macular thickness or peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Conclusions: No difference between macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses were detected in dominant and non-dominant groups. Further evaluation is needed.Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802018000600316Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia v.77 n.6 2018reponame:Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO)instacron:SBO10.5935/0034-7280.20180068info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCevher,SelimKocluk,YusufCetinkaya,SavasSukgen,Emine Alyamaceng2019-02-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-72802018000600316Revistahttps://rbo.emnuvens.com.br/rbo/indexhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpsob@sboportal.org.br||rbo@sboportal.org.br1982-85510034-7280opendoar:2019-02-01T00:00Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Macular thickness and retinal nerve fiber thickness analysis in ocular dominance
title Macular thickness and retinal nerve fiber thickness analysis in ocular dominance
spellingShingle Macular thickness and retinal nerve fiber thickness analysis in ocular dominance
Cevher,Selim
Macula lutea/anatomy & histology
Retina
Nerve fibers
Dominance, ocular
title_short Macular thickness and retinal nerve fiber thickness analysis in ocular dominance
title_full Macular thickness and retinal nerve fiber thickness analysis in ocular dominance
title_fullStr Macular thickness and retinal nerve fiber thickness analysis in ocular dominance
title_full_unstemmed Macular thickness and retinal nerve fiber thickness analysis in ocular dominance
title_sort Macular thickness and retinal nerve fiber thickness analysis in ocular dominance
author Cevher,Selim
author_facet Cevher,Selim
Kocluk,Yusuf
Cetinkaya,Savas
Sukgen,Emine Alyamac
author_role author
author2 Kocluk,Yusuf
Cetinkaya,Savas
Sukgen,Emine Alyamac
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cevher,Selim
Kocluk,Yusuf
Cetinkaya,Savas
Sukgen,Emine Alyamac
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Macula lutea/anatomy & histology
Retina
Nerve fibers
Dominance, ocular
topic Macula lutea/anatomy & histology
Retina
Nerve fibers
Dominance, ocular
description Abstract Objective: To compare macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses of dominant eye and non-dominant eye using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: 104 eyes of 52 healthy young adults were included. Ophthalmological examinations; including measuring refraction, best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, slit-lamb biomicroscopy, dilated fundus examination, measuring of central macular thickness (CMT), and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (PRNFL) thickness were performed on each subject. Hole-in-the-card test was used to detect the ocular dominance. Results: There were 25 females (48%) and 27 males (52%) in the study. Eight participants had left eye dominance (15%), forty-four participants had right eye dominance (85%). Mean CMT was 192.5µm in dominant group and 191.9 µm in non-dominant group. There was no statistically significant difference between dominant eye group and non-dominant eye group in either macular thickness or peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Conclusions: No difference between macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses were detected in dominant and non-dominant groups. Further evaluation is needed.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802018000600316
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802018000600316
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/0034-7280.20180068
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia v.77 n.6 2018
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO)
instacron:SBO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO)
instacron_str SBO
institution SBO
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sob@sboportal.org.br||rbo@sboportal.org.br
_version_ 1752122338342600704