Export Ready — 

Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System?

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nakamura, Walter T.
Publication Date: 2019
Other Authors: Marques, Leonardo C., Rivero, Luis, Oliveira, Elaine H. T. de, Conte, Tayana
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação
Download full: https://journals-sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/rbie/article/view/4758
Summary: As technology evolves, learning institutions have sought to invest in new learning technologies. Many universities have been adopting platforms designed to support the learning process, called Learning Management Systems (LMSs), to complement face-to-face learning, as well as to support distance learning. This widespread adoption of LMSs raises the need for evaluating them regarding aspects related to quality in use, such as User eXperience (UX). UX is very important in e-learning context, given that it may influence learner’s attitude towards the use of the LMS. Despite its importance, few studies evaluated the UX of LMSs. Moreover, researchers have been using generic techniques to evaluate them. In this context, there is no evidence of studies conducted to identify whether these techniques can fully capture the experience conveyed by these platforms. This paper presents an analysis of two UX evaluation techniques (User Experience Questionnaire, and Integrated Experience Acceptance Model) applied to an LMS called Edmodo. We carried out a study with 34 students, divided into two groups, to evaluate the UX of Edmodo and obtain their perceptions about the technique they used. We also gathered the difficulties faced by the students during the execution of the tasks on the platform, while correlating those difficulties with learning issues. In addition, we performed a qualitative analysis in order to better understand the results. Regarding Edmodo, the results showed that the students perceived its UX as positive. Regarding the techniques, both groups considered them easy to use and useful. However, around 41% of the students in both groups reported that they were not able to fully evaluate their UX using the techniques. The qualitative results allowed the identification of positive and negative aspects that researchers may consider during the improvement or development of new UX evaluation techniques.
id SBC-6_0506aab8bf5bad849faceba2ff0b51bc
oai_identifier_str oai:journals-sol.sbc.org.br:article/4758
network_acronym_str SBC-6
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação
repository_id_str
spelling Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System?Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System?Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System?User ExperienceLearning Management SystemLMSUXEdmodoUser ExperienceLearning Management SystemLMSUXEdmodoUser ExperienceLearning Management SystemLMSUXEdmodoAs technology evolves, learning institutions have sought to invest in new learning technologies. Many universities have been adopting platforms designed to support the learning process, called Learning Management Systems (LMSs), to complement face-to-face learning, as well as to support distance learning. This widespread adoption of LMSs raises the need for evaluating them regarding aspects related to quality in use, such as User eXperience (UX). UX is very important in e-learning context, given that it may influence learner’s attitude towards the use of the LMS. Despite its importance, few studies evaluated the UX of LMSs. Moreover, researchers have been using generic techniques to evaluate them. In this context, there is no evidence of studies conducted to identify whether these techniques can fully capture the experience conveyed by these platforms. This paper presents an analysis of two UX evaluation techniques (User Experience Questionnaire, and Integrated Experience Acceptance Model) applied to an LMS called Edmodo. We carried out a study with 34 students, divided into two groups, to evaluate the UX of Edmodo and obtain their perceptions about the technique they used. We also gathered the difficulties faced by the students during the execution of the tasks on the platform, while correlating those difficulties with learning issues. In addition, we performed a qualitative analysis in order to better understand the results. Regarding Edmodo, the results showed that the students perceived its UX as positive. Regarding the techniques, both groups considered them easy to use and useful. However, around 41% of the students in both groups reported that they were not able to fully evaluate their UX using the techniques. The qualitative results allowed the identification of positive and negative aspects that researchers may consider during the improvement or development of new UX evaluation techniques.As technology evolves, learning institutions have sought to invest in new learning technologies. Many universities have been adopting platforms designed to support the learning process, called Learning Management Systems (LMSs), to complement face-to-face learning, as well as to support distance learning. This widespread adoption of LMSs raises the need for evaluating them regarding aspects related to quality in use, such as User eXperience (UX). UX is very important in e-learning context, given that it may influence learner’s attitude towards the use of the LMS. Despite its importance, few studies evaluated the UX of LMSs. Moreover, researchers have been using generic techniques to evaluate them. In this context, there is no evidence of studies conducted to identify whether these techniques can fully capture the experience conveyed by these platforms. This paper presents an analysis of two UX evaluation techniques (User Experience Questionnaire, and Integrated Experience Acceptance Model) applied to an LMS called Edmodo. We carried out a study with 34 students, divided into two groups, to evaluate the UX of Edmodo and obtain their perceptions about the technique they used. We also gathered the difficulties faced by the students during the execution of the tasks on the platform, while correlating those difficulties with learning issues. In addition, we performed a qualitative analysis in order to better understand the results. Regarding Edmodo, the results showed that the students perceived its UX as positive. Regarding the techniques, both groups considered them easy to use and useful. However, around 41% of the students in both groups reported that they were not able to fully evaluate their UX using the techniques. The qualitative results allowed the identification of positive and negative aspects that researchers may consider during the improvement or development of new UX evaluation techniques.As technology evolves, learning institutions have sought to invest in new learning technologies. Many universities have been adopting platforms designed to support the learning process, called Learning Management Systems (LMSs), to complement face-to-face learning, as well as to support distance learning. This widespread adoption of LMSs raises the need for evaluating them regarding aspects related to quality in use, such as User eXperience (UX). UX is very important in e-learning context, given that it may influence learner’s attitude towards the use of the LMS. Despite its importance, few studies evaluated the UX of LMSs. Moreover, researchers have been using generic techniques to evaluate them. In this context, there is no evidence of studies conducted to identify whether these techniques can fully capture the experience conveyed by these platforms. This paper presents an analysis of two UX evaluation techniques (User Experience Questionnaire, and Integrated Experience Acceptance Model) applied to an LMS called Edmodo. We carried out a study with 34 students, divided into two groups, to evaluate the UX of Edmodo and obtain their perceptions about the technique they used. We also gathered the difficulties faced by the students during the execution of the tasks on the platform, while correlating those difficulties with learning issues. In addition, we performed a qualitative analysis in order to better understand the results. Regarding Edmodo, the results showed that the students perceived its UX as positive. Regarding the techniques, both groups considered them easy to use and useful. However, around 41% of the students in both groups reported that they were not able to fully evaluate their UX using the techniques. The qualitative results allowed the identification of positive and negative aspects that researchers may consider during the improvement or development of new UX evaluation techniques.Sociedade Brasileira de Computação2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo estendido avaliado pelos paresPeer-reviewed extended articleArtículo extendido revisado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://journals-sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/rbie/article/view/475810.5753/rbie.2019.27.01.104Revista Brasileña de Informática en la Educación; Vol. 27 Núm. 1 (2019); 104-131Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação; Vol. 27 No. 1 (2019); 104-131Brazilian Journal of Computers in Education; Vol. 27 No. 1 (2019); 104-1312317-61211414-5685reponame:Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educaçãoinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (SBC)instacron:SBCenghttps://journals-sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/rbie/article/view/4758/2834Copyright (c) 2019 Walter T. Nakamura, Leonardo C. Marques, Luis Rivero, Elaine H. T. de Oliveira, Tayana Contehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNakamura, Walter T.Marques, Leonardo C.Rivero, LuisOliveira, Elaine H. T. deConte, Tayana2024-07-28T11:00:03Zoai:journals-sol.sbc.org.br:article/4758Revistahttps://journals-sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/rbieONGhttps://journals-sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/rbie/oaipublicacoes@sbc.org.br2317-61211414-5685opendoar:2024-07-28T11:00:03Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação - Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (SBC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System?
Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System?
Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System?
title Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System?
spellingShingle Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System?
Nakamura, Walter T.
User Experience
Learning Management System
LMS
UX
Edmodo
User Experience
Learning Management System
LMS
UX
Edmodo
User Experience
Learning Management System
LMS
UX
Edmodo
title_short Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System?
title_full Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System?
title_fullStr Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System?
title_full_unstemmed Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System?
title_sort Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System?
author Nakamura, Walter T.
author_facet Nakamura, Walter T.
Marques, Leonardo C.
Rivero, Luis
Oliveira, Elaine H. T. de
Conte, Tayana
author_role author
author2 Marques, Leonardo C.
Rivero, Luis
Oliveira, Elaine H. T. de
Conte, Tayana
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nakamura, Walter T.
Marques, Leonardo C.
Rivero, Luis
Oliveira, Elaine H. T. de
Conte, Tayana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv User Experience
Learning Management System
LMS
UX
Edmodo
User Experience
Learning Management System
LMS
UX
Edmodo
User Experience
Learning Management System
LMS
UX
Edmodo
topic User Experience
Learning Management System
LMS
UX
Edmodo
User Experience
Learning Management System
LMS
UX
Edmodo
User Experience
Learning Management System
LMS
UX
Edmodo
description As technology evolves, learning institutions have sought to invest in new learning technologies. Many universities have been adopting platforms designed to support the learning process, called Learning Management Systems (LMSs), to complement face-to-face learning, as well as to support distance learning. This widespread adoption of LMSs raises the need for evaluating them regarding aspects related to quality in use, such as User eXperience (UX). UX is very important in e-learning context, given that it may influence learner’s attitude towards the use of the LMS. Despite its importance, few studies evaluated the UX of LMSs. Moreover, researchers have been using generic techniques to evaluate them. In this context, there is no evidence of studies conducted to identify whether these techniques can fully capture the experience conveyed by these platforms. This paper presents an analysis of two UX evaluation techniques (User Experience Questionnaire, and Integrated Experience Acceptance Model) applied to an LMS called Edmodo. We carried out a study with 34 students, divided into two groups, to evaluate the UX of Edmodo and obtain their perceptions about the technique they used. We also gathered the difficulties faced by the students during the execution of the tasks on the platform, while correlating those difficulties with learning issues. In addition, we performed a qualitative analysis in order to better understand the results. Regarding Edmodo, the results showed that the students perceived its UX as positive. Regarding the techniques, both groups considered them easy to use and useful. However, around 41% of the students in both groups reported that they were not able to fully evaluate their UX using the techniques. The qualitative results allowed the identification of positive and negative aspects that researchers may consider during the improvement or development of new UX evaluation techniques.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo estendido avaliado pelos pares
Peer-reviewed extended article
Artículo extendido revisado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://journals-sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/rbie/article/view/4758
10.5753/rbie.2019.27.01.104
url https://journals-sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/rbie/article/view/4758
identifier_str_mv 10.5753/rbie.2019.27.01.104
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://journals-sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/rbie/article/view/4758/2834
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Computação
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Computação
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileña de Informática en la Educación; Vol. 27 Núm. 1 (2019); 104-131
Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação; Vol. 27 No. 1 (2019); 104-131
Brazilian Journal of Computers in Education; Vol. 27 No. 1 (2019); 104-131
2317-6121
1414-5685
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (SBC)
instacron:SBC
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (SBC)
instacron_str SBC
institution SBC
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação
collection Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação - Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (SBC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicacoes@sbc.org.br
_version_ 1832111043678044160