Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System?
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2019 |
Other Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação |
Download full: | https://journals-sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/rbie/article/view/4758 |
Summary: | As technology evolves, learning institutions have sought to invest in new learning technologies. Many universities have been adopting platforms designed to support the learning process, called Learning Management Systems (LMSs), to complement face-to-face learning, as well as to support distance learning. This widespread adoption of LMSs raises the need for evaluating them regarding aspects related to quality in use, such as User eXperience (UX). UX is very important in e-learning context, given that it may influence learner’s attitude towards the use of the LMS. Despite its importance, few studies evaluated the UX of LMSs. Moreover, researchers have been using generic techniques to evaluate them. In this context, there is no evidence of studies conducted to identify whether these techniques can fully capture the experience conveyed by these platforms. This paper presents an analysis of two UX evaluation techniques (User Experience Questionnaire, and Integrated Experience Acceptance Model) applied to an LMS called Edmodo. We carried out a study with 34 students, divided into two groups, to evaluate the UX of Edmodo and obtain their perceptions about the technique they used. We also gathered the difficulties faced by the students during the execution of the tasks on the platform, while correlating those difficulties with learning issues. In addition, we performed a qualitative analysis in order to better understand the results. Regarding Edmodo, the results showed that the students perceived its UX as positive. Regarding the techniques, both groups considered them easy to use and useful. However, around 41% of the students in both groups reported that they were not able to fully evaluate their UX using the techniques. The qualitative results allowed the identification of positive and negative aspects that researchers may consider during the improvement or development of new UX evaluation techniques. |
id |
SBC-6_0506aab8bf5bad849faceba2ff0b51bc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:journals-sol.sbc.org.br:article/4758 |
network_acronym_str |
SBC-6 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System?Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System?Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System?User ExperienceLearning Management SystemLMSUXEdmodoUser ExperienceLearning Management SystemLMSUXEdmodoUser ExperienceLearning Management SystemLMSUXEdmodoAs technology evolves, learning institutions have sought to invest in new learning technologies. Many universities have been adopting platforms designed to support the learning process, called Learning Management Systems (LMSs), to complement face-to-face learning, as well as to support distance learning. This widespread adoption of LMSs raises the need for evaluating them regarding aspects related to quality in use, such as User eXperience (UX). UX is very important in e-learning context, given that it may influence learner’s attitude towards the use of the LMS. Despite its importance, few studies evaluated the UX of LMSs. Moreover, researchers have been using generic techniques to evaluate them. In this context, there is no evidence of studies conducted to identify whether these techniques can fully capture the experience conveyed by these platforms. This paper presents an analysis of two UX evaluation techniques (User Experience Questionnaire, and Integrated Experience Acceptance Model) applied to an LMS called Edmodo. We carried out a study with 34 students, divided into two groups, to evaluate the UX of Edmodo and obtain their perceptions about the technique they used. We also gathered the difficulties faced by the students during the execution of the tasks on the platform, while correlating those difficulties with learning issues. In addition, we performed a qualitative analysis in order to better understand the results. Regarding Edmodo, the results showed that the students perceived its UX as positive. Regarding the techniques, both groups considered them easy to use and useful. However, around 41% of the students in both groups reported that they were not able to fully evaluate their UX using the techniques. The qualitative results allowed the identification of positive and negative aspects that researchers may consider during the improvement or development of new UX evaluation techniques.As technology evolves, learning institutions have sought to invest in new learning technologies. Many universities have been adopting platforms designed to support the learning process, called Learning Management Systems (LMSs), to complement face-to-face learning, as well as to support distance learning. This widespread adoption of LMSs raises the need for evaluating them regarding aspects related to quality in use, such as User eXperience (UX). UX is very important in e-learning context, given that it may influence learner’s attitude towards the use of the LMS. Despite its importance, few studies evaluated the UX of LMSs. Moreover, researchers have been using generic techniques to evaluate them. In this context, there is no evidence of studies conducted to identify whether these techniques can fully capture the experience conveyed by these platforms. This paper presents an analysis of two UX evaluation techniques (User Experience Questionnaire, and Integrated Experience Acceptance Model) applied to an LMS called Edmodo. We carried out a study with 34 students, divided into two groups, to evaluate the UX of Edmodo and obtain their perceptions about the technique they used. We also gathered the difficulties faced by the students during the execution of the tasks on the platform, while correlating those difficulties with learning issues. In addition, we performed a qualitative analysis in order to better understand the results. Regarding Edmodo, the results showed that the students perceived its UX as positive. Regarding the techniques, both groups considered them easy to use and useful. However, around 41% of the students in both groups reported that they were not able to fully evaluate their UX using the techniques. The qualitative results allowed the identification of positive and negative aspects that researchers may consider during the improvement or development of new UX evaluation techniques.As technology evolves, learning institutions have sought to invest in new learning technologies. Many universities have been adopting platforms designed to support the learning process, called Learning Management Systems (LMSs), to complement face-to-face learning, as well as to support distance learning. This widespread adoption of LMSs raises the need for evaluating them regarding aspects related to quality in use, such as User eXperience (UX). UX is very important in e-learning context, given that it may influence learner’s attitude towards the use of the LMS. Despite its importance, few studies evaluated the UX of LMSs. Moreover, researchers have been using generic techniques to evaluate them. In this context, there is no evidence of studies conducted to identify whether these techniques can fully capture the experience conveyed by these platforms. This paper presents an analysis of two UX evaluation techniques (User Experience Questionnaire, and Integrated Experience Acceptance Model) applied to an LMS called Edmodo. We carried out a study with 34 students, divided into two groups, to evaluate the UX of Edmodo and obtain their perceptions about the technique they used. We also gathered the difficulties faced by the students during the execution of the tasks on the platform, while correlating those difficulties with learning issues. In addition, we performed a qualitative analysis in order to better understand the results. Regarding Edmodo, the results showed that the students perceived its UX as positive. Regarding the techniques, both groups considered them easy to use and useful. However, around 41% of the students in both groups reported that they were not able to fully evaluate their UX using the techniques. The qualitative results allowed the identification of positive and negative aspects that researchers may consider during the improvement or development of new UX evaluation techniques.Sociedade Brasileira de Computação2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo estendido avaliado pelos paresPeer-reviewed extended articleArtículo extendido revisado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://journals-sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/rbie/article/view/475810.5753/rbie.2019.27.01.104Revista Brasileña de Informática en la Educación; Vol. 27 Núm. 1 (2019); 104-131Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação; Vol. 27 No. 1 (2019); 104-131Brazilian Journal of Computers in Education; Vol. 27 No. 1 (2019); 104-1312317-61211414-5685reponame:Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educaçãoinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (SBC)instacron:SBCenghttps://journals-sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/rbie/article/view/4758/2834Copyright (c) 2019 Walter T. Nakamura, Leonardo C. Marques, Luis Rivero, Elaine H. T. de Oliveira, Tayana Contehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNakamura, Walter T.Marques, Leonardo C.Rivero, LuisOliveira, Elaine H. T. deConte, Tayana2024-07-28T11:00:03Zoai:journals-sol.sbc.org.br:article/4758Revistahttps://journals-sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/rbieONGhttps://journals-sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/rbie/oaipublicacoes@sbc.org.br2317-61211414-5685opendoar:2024-07-28T11:00:03Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação - Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (SBC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System? Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System? Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System? |
title |
Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System? |
spellingShingle |
Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System? Nakamura, Walter T. User Experience Learning Management System LMS UX Edmodo User Experience Learning Management System LMS UX Edmodo User Experience Learning Management System LMS UX Edmodo |
title_short |
Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System? |
title_full |
Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System? |
title_fullStr |
Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System? |
title_sort |
Are scale-based techniques enough for learners to convey their UX when using a Learning Management System? |
author |
Nakamura, Walter T. |
author_facet |
Nakamura, Walter T. Marques, Leonardo C. Rivero, Luis Oliveira, Elaine H. T. de Conte, Tayana |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Marques, Leonardo C. Rivero, Luis Oliveira, Elaine H. T. de Conte, Tayana |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nakamura, Walter T. Marques, Leonardo C. Rivero, Luis Oliveira, Elaine H. T. de Conte, Tayana |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
User Experience Learning Management System LMS UX Edmodo User Experience Learning Management System LMS UX Edmodo User Experience Learning Management System LMS UX Edmodo |
topic |
User Experience Learning Management System LMS UX Edmodo User Experience Learning Management System LMS UX Edmodo User Experience Learning Management System LMS UX Edmodo |
description |
As technology evolves, learning institutions have sought to invest in new learning technologies. Many universities have been adopting platforms designed to support the learning process, called Learning Management Systems (LMSs), to complement face-to-face learning, as well as to support distance learning. This widespread adoption of LMSs raises the need for evaluating them regarding aspects related to quality in use, such as User eXperience (UX). UX is very important in e-learning context, given that it may influence learner’s attitude towards the use of the LMS. Despite its importance, few studies evaluated the UX of LMSs. Moreover, researchers have been using generic techniques to evaluate them. In this context, there is no evidence of studies conducted to identify whether these techniques can fully capture the experience conveyed by these platforms. This paper presents an analysis of two UX evaluation techniques (User Experience Questionnaire, and Integrated Experience Acceptance Model) applied to an LMS called Edmodo. We carried out a study with 34 students, divided into two groups, to evaluate the UX of Edmodo and obtain their perceptions about the technique they used. We also gathered the difficulties faced by the students during the execution of the tasks on the platform, while correlating those difficulties with learning issues. In addition, we performed a qualitative analysis in order to better understand the results. Regarding Edmodo, the results showed that the students perceived its UX as positive. Regarding the techniques, both groups considered them easy to use and useful. However, around 41% of the students in both groups reported that they were not able to fully evaluate their UX using the techniques. The qualitative results allowed the identification of positive and negative aspects that researchers may consider during the improvement or development of new UX evaluation techniques. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo estendido avaliado pelos pares Peer-reviewed extended article Artículo extendido revisado por pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://journals-sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/rbie/article/view/4758 10.5753/rbie.2019.27.01.104 |
url |
https://journals-sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/rbie/article/view/4758 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5753/rbie.2019.27.01.104 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://journals-sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/rbie/article/view/4758/2834 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Computação |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Computação |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileña de Informática en la Educación; Vol. 27 Núm. 1 (2019); 104-131 Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação; Vol. 27 No. 1 (2019); 104-131 Brazilian Journal of Computers in Education; Vol. 27 No. 1 (2019); 104-131 2317-6121 1414-5685 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (SBC) instacron:SBC |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (SBC) |
instacron_str |
SBC |
institution |
SBC |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação - Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (SBC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicacoes@sbc.org.br |
_version_ |
1832111043678044160 |