A comparison of presmoothing methods in the estimation of transition probabilities
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2018 |
Other Authors: | , |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/1822/69568 |
Summary: | One major goal in clinical applications of multi-state models is the estimation of transition probabilities. In a recent paper, landmark estimators were proposed to estimate these quantities, and their superiority with respect to the competing estimators has been proved in situations in which the Markov condition is violated. The idea behind their estimator is to use a procedure based on (differences between) Kaplan-Meier estimators derived from a subset of the data consisting of all subjects observed to be in the given state at the given time. Because of this, the computation of their estimator is performed in small sample sizes providing large standard errors in some circumstances. A valid approach is to consider a modification of the landmark estimator based on presmoothing. In this two presmoothing methods are compared. Simulation results indicate that both methods may be much more efficient than the unsmoothed estimator. Real data illustration is included. |
id |
RCAP_eae973fb271b920ea6b3dc15df47c63d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/69568 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
A comparison of presmoothing methods in the estimation of transition probabilitiesKaplan-MeierMulti-state modelNonparametric estimationPresmoothingSurvival AnalysisCiências Naturais::MatemáticasOne major goal in clinical applications of multi-state models is the estimation of transition probabilities. In a recent paper, landmark estimators were proposed to estimate these quantities, and their superiority with respect to the competing estimators has been proved in situations in which the Markov condition is violated. The idea behind their estimator is to use a procedure based on (differences between) Kaplan-Meier estimators derived from a subset of the data consisting of all subjects observed to be in the given state at the given time. Because of this, the computation of their estimator is performed in small sample sizes providing large standard errors in some circumstances. A valid approach is to consider a modification of the landmark estimator based on presmoothing. In this two presmoothing methods are compared. Simulation results indicate that both methods may be much more efficient than the unsmoothed estimator. Real data illustration is included.Portuguese Funds through FCT - “Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia”Universidade do MinhoSoutinho, Gustavo Domingos Costa CoelhoMachado, Luís MeiraOliveira, Pedro Nuno Ferreira Pinto20182018-01-01T00:00:00Zconference objectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/69568enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-05-11T04:41:21Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/69568Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T14:55:22.961817Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A comparison of presmoothing methods in the estimation of transition probabilities |
title |
A comparison of presmoothing methods in the estimation of transition probabilities |
spellingShingle |
A comparison of presmoothing methods in the estimation of transition probabilities Soutinho, Gustavo Domingos Costa Coelho Kaplan-Meier Multi-state model Nonparametric estimation Presmoothing Survival Analysis Ciências Naturais::Matemáticas |
title_short |
A comparison of presmoothing methods in the estimation of transition probabilities |
title_full |
A comparison of presmoothing methods in the estimation of transition probabilities |
title_fullStr |
A comparison of presmoothing methods in the estimation of transition probabilities |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison of presmoothing methods in the estimation of transition probabilities |
title_sort |
A comparison of presmoothing methods in the estimation of transition probabilities |
author |
Soutinho, Gustavo Domingos Costa Coelho |
author_facet |
Soutinho, Gustavo Domingos Costa Coelho Machado, Luís Meira Oliveira, Pedro Nuno Ferreira Pinto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Machado, Luís Meira Oliveira, Pedro Nuno Ferreira Pinto |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Minho |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Soutinho, Gustavo Domingos Costa Coelho Machado, Luís Meira Oliveira, Pedro Nuno Ferreira Pinto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Kaplan-Meier Multi-state model Nonparametric estimation Presmoothing Survival Analysis Ciências Naturais::Matemáticas |
topic |
Kaplan-Meier Multi-state model Nonparametric estimation Presmoothing Survival Analysis Ciências Naturais::Matemáticas |
description |
One major goal in clinical applications of multi-state models is the estimation of transition probabilities. In a recent paper, landmark estimators were proposed to estimate these quantities, and their superiority with respect to the competing estimators has been proved in situations in which the Markov condition is violated. The idea behind their estimator is to use a procedure based on (differences between) Kaplan-Meier estimators derived from a subset of the data consisting of all subjects observed to be in the given state at the given time. Because of this, the computation of their estimator is performed in small sample sizes providing large standard errors in some circumstances. A valid approach is to consider a modification of the landmark estimator based on presmoothing. In this two presmoothing methods are compared. Simulation results indicate that both methods may be much more efficient than the unsmoothed estimator. Real data illustration is included. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
conference object |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/1822/69568 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1822/69568 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833594980947460096 |