Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Costa, R.
Publication Date: 2015
Other Authors: Malheiro, J., Tafulo, S., Santos, C., Almeida, M., Pedroso, S., Martins, L., Dias, L., Castro-Henriques, A.
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/1931
Summary: Background: Evidence supporting deleterious effect of preformed major histocompatibility class I chain-related A (MICA) antibodies in rejection incidence and graft survival is still unclear. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 554 kidney transplanted patients. Comparison between positive or negative for MICA antibodies patients was performed to characterize sensitizing triggers. Further classification according to pre-transplant flow cytometry-recorded anti–MICA and/or anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies was made to determine first year rejection incidence and graft survival. Multivariate analysis was applied to determine predictors for acute rejection. Results: Pre-formed anti-MICA antibodies were detected in 41 patients (7.4%). HLA sensitization, blood transfusions and pregnancies were frequently found in anti-MICA+ patients but only pre-formed anti-HLA class I antibodies showed independent association (OR 2.67, p= 0.02). Comparing to MICA-/HLA–, MICA-/HLA+ group presented significantly lower first year rejection-free survival (78.6% vs. 89.3%, p< 0.01), mostly occurred in the first six months, while no difference was found in MICA+/HLA– (88.9% vs. 89.3%, p= ns). MICA-/HLA+ showed independent impact in rejection (OR 2.09, p= 0.03), while no evidence was found in MICA+/HLA- (OR 1.08, p= ns). At 4 years, MICA-/HLA+ group presented lower graft survival (85.8% vs. 95.3%, p= 0.03). Again, no difference was found in MICA+/HLA- group (95.1% vs. 95.3%, p= ns). Conclusion: Our results do not support HLA-independent deleterious pathogenic role of pre-formed MICA antibodies on first year rejection incidence and graft survival.
id RCAP_d59f637f89e8fc8eb2a988844fcb011e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.chporto.pt:10400.16/1931
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survivalImpacto da sensibilização anti -MICA pré -transplante na rejeição e sobrevida do enxertoHLAkidneyMICArejectionsurvivaltransplantrejeiçãorimsobrevidatransplanteBackground: Evidence supporting deleterious effect of preformed major histocompatibility class I chain-related A (MICA) antibodies in rejection incidence and graft survival is still unclear. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 554 kidney transplanted patients. Comparison between positive or negative for MICA antibodies patients was performed to characterize sensitizing triggers. Further classification according to pre-transplant flow cytometry-recorded anti–MICA and/or anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies was made to determine first year rejection incidence and graft survival. Multivariate analysis was applied to determine predictors for acute rejection. Results: Pre-formed anti-MICA antibodies were detected in 41 patients (7.4%). HLA sensitization, blood transfusions and pregnancies were frequently found in anti-MICA+ patients but only pre-formed anti-HLA class I antibodies showed independent association (OR 2.67, p= 0.02). Comparing to MICA-/HLA–, MICA-/HLA+ group presented significantly lower first year rejection-free survival (78.6% vs. 89.3%, p< 0.01), mostly occurred in the first six months, while no difference was found in MICA+/HLA– (88.9% vs. 89.3%, p= ns). MICA-/HLA+ showed independent impact in rejection (OR 2.09, p= 0.03), while no evidence was found in MICA+/HLA- (OR 1.08, p= ns). At 4 years, MICA-/HLA+ group presented lower graft survival (85.8% vs. 95.3%, p= 0.03). Again, no difference was found in MICA+/HLA- group (95.1% vs. 95.3%, p= ns). Conclusion: Our results do not support HLA-independent deleterious pathogenic role of pre-formed MICA antibodies on first year rejection incidence and graft survival.Repositório Científico da Unidade Local de Saúde de Santo AntónioCosta, R.Malheiro, J.Tafulo, S.Santos, C.Almeida, M.Pedroso, S.Martins, L.Dias, L.Castro-Henriques, A.2016-04-26T16:15:36Z20152015-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/1931eng2183-1289info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-02-26T10:07:05Zoai:repositorio.chporto.pt:10400.16/1931Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T21:18:56.635353Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival
Impacto da sensibilização anti -MICA pré -transplante na rejeição e sobrevida do enxerto
title Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival
spellingShingle Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival
Costa, R.
HLA
kidney
MICA
rejection
survival
transplant
rejeição
rim
sobrevida
transplante
title_short Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival
title_full Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival
title_fullStr Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival
title_full_unstemmed Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival
title_sort Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival
author Costa, R.
author_facet Costa, R.
Malheiro, J.
Tafulo, S.
Santos, C.
Almeida, M.
Pedroso, S.
Martins, L.
Dias, L.
Castro-Henriques, A.
author_role author
author2 Malheiro, J.
Tafulo, S.
Santos, C.
Almeida, M.
Pedroso, S.
Martins, L.
Dias, L.
Castro-Henriques, A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico da Unidade Local de Saúde de Santo António
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, R.
Malheiro, J.
Tafulo, S.
Santos, C.
Almeida, M.
Pedroso, S.
Martins, L.
Dias, L.
Castro-Henriques, A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv HLA
kidney
MICA
rejection
survival
transplant
rejeição
rim
sobrevida
transplante
topic HLA
kidney
MICA
rejection
survival
transplant
rejeição
rim
sobrevida
transplante
description Background: Evidence supporting deleterious effect of preformed major histocompatibility class I chain-related A (MICA) antibodies in rejection incidence and graft survival is still unclear. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 554 kidney transplanted patients. Comparison between positive or negative for MICA antibodies patients was performed to characterize sensitizing triggers. Further classification according to pre-transplant flow cytometry-recorded anti–MICA and/or anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies was made to determine first year rejection incidence and graft survival. Multivariate analysis was applied to determine predictors for acute rejection. Results: Pre-formed anti-MICA antibodies were detected in 41 patients (7.4%). HLA sensitization, blood transfusions and pregnancies were frequently found in anti-MICA+ patients but only pre-formed anti-HLA class I antibodies showed independent association (OR 2.67, p= 0.02). Comparing to MICA-/HLA–, MICA-/HLA+ group presented significantly lower first year rejection-free survival (78.6% vs. 89.3%, p< 0.01), mostly occurred in the first six months, while no difference was found in MICA+/HLA– (88.9% vs. 89.3%, p= ns). MICA-/HLA+ showed independent impact in rejection (OR 2.09, p= 0.03), while no evidence was found in MICA+/HLA- (OR 1.08, p= ns). At 4 years, MICA-/HLA+ group presented lower graft survival (85.8% vs. 95.3%, p= 0.03). Again, no difference was found in MICA+/HLA- group (95.1% vs. 95.3%, p= ns). Conclusion: Our results do not support HLA-independent deleterious pathogenic role of pre-formed MICA antibodies on first year rejection incidence and graft survival.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
2016-04-26T16:15:36Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/1931
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/1931
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2183-1289
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833599215099445248