Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Costa,Rui
Publication Date: 2015
Other Authors: Malheiro,Jorge, Tafulo,Sandra, Santos,Clara, Almeida,Manuela, Pedroso,Sofia, Martins,La Salete, Dias,Leonídio, Castro-Henriques,António
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-01692015000200005
Summary: Background: Evidence supporting deleterious effect of preformed major histocompatibility class I chain-related A (MICA) antibodies in rejection incidence and graft survival is still unclear. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 554 kidney transplanted patients. Comparison between positive or negative for MICA antibodies patients was performed to characterize sensitizing triggers. Further classification according to pre-transplant flow cytometry-recorded anti-MICA and/or anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies was made to determine first year rejection incidence and graft survival. Multivariate analysis was applied to determine predictors for acute rejection. Results: Pre-formed anti-MICA antibodies were detected in 41 patients (7.4%). HLA sensitization, blood transfusions and pregnancies were frequently found in anti-MICA+ patients but only pre-formed anti-HLA class I antibodies showed independent association (OR 2.67, p = 0.02). Comparing to MICA-/HLA-, MICA-/HLA+ group presented significantly lower first year rejection-free survival (78.6% vs. 89.3%, p < 0.01), mostly occurred in the first six months, while no difference was found in MICA+/HLA- (88.9% vs. 89.3%, p = ns). MICA-/HLA+ showed independent impact in rejection (OR 2.09, p = 0.03), while no evidence was found in MICA+/HLA- (OR 1.08, p = ns). At 4 years, MICA-/HLA+ group presented lower graft survival (85.8% vs. 95.3%, p = 0.03). Again, no difference was found in MICA+/HLA- group (95.1% vs. 95.3%, p = ns). Conclusion: Our results do not support HLA-independent deleterious pathogenic role of pre-formed MICA antibodies on first year rejection incidence and graft survival
id RCAP_5c2ded9b4bb401f29f89aa48cd656021
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0872-01692015000200005
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survivalHLAkidneyMICArejectionsurvivaltransplantBackground: Evidence supporting deleterious effect of preformed major histocompatibility class I chain-related A (MICA) antibodies in rejection incidence and graft survival is still unclear. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 554 kidney transplanted patients. Comparison between positive or negative for MICA antibodies patients was performed to characterize sensitizing triggers. Further classification according to pre-transplant flow cytometry-recorded anti-MICA and/or anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies was made to determine first year rejection incidence and graft survival. Multivariate analysis was applied to determine predictors for acute rejection. Results: Pre-formed anti-MICA antibodies were detected in 41 patients (7.4%). HLA sensitization, blood transfusions and pregnancies were frequently found in anti-MICA+ patients but only pre-formed anti-HLA class I antibodies showed independent association (OR 2.67, p = 0.02). Comparing to MICA-/HLA-, MICA-/HLA+ group presented significantly lower first year rejection-free survival (78.6% vs. 89.3%, p < 0.01), mostly occurred in the first six months, while no difference was found in MICA+/HLA- (88.9% vs. 89.3%, p = ns). MICA-/HLA+ showed independent impact in rejection (OR 2.09, p = 0.03), while no evidence was found in MICA+/HLA- (OR 1.08, p = ns). At 4 years, MICA-/HLA+ group presented lower graft survival (85.8% vs. 95.3%, p = 0.03). Again, no difference was found in MICA+/HLA- group (95.1% vs. 95.3%, p = ns). Conclusion: Our results do not support HLA-independent deleterious pathogenic role of pre-formed MICA antibodies on first year rejection incidence and graft survivalSociedade Portuguesa de Nefrologia2015-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-01692015000200005Portuguese Journal of Nephrology &amp; Hypertension v.29 n.2 2015reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-01692015000200005Costa,RuiMalheiro,JorgeTafulo,SandraSantos,ClaraAlmeida,ManuelaPedroso,SofiaMartins,La SaleteDias,LeonídioCastro-Henriques,Antónioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:04:48Zoai:scielo:S0872-01692015000200005Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T12:54:25.611101Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival
title Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival
spellingShingle Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival
Costa,Rui
HLA
kidney
MICA
rejection
survival
transplant
title_short Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival
title_full Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival
title_fullStr Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival
title_full_unstemmed Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival
title_sort Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival
author Costa,Rui
author_facet Costa,Rui
Malheiro,Jorge
Tafulo,Sandra
Santos,Clara
Almeida,Manuela
Pedroso,Sofia
Martins,La Salete
Dias,Leonídio
Castro-Henriques,António
author_role author
author2 Malheiro,Jorge
Tafulo,Sandra
Santos,Clara
Almeida,Manuela
Pedroso,Sofia
Martins,La Salete
Dias,Leonídio
Castro-Henriques,António
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa,Rui
Malheiro,Jorge
Tafulo,Sandra
Santos,Clara
Almeida,Manuela
Pedroso,Sofia
Martins,La Salete
Dias,Leonídio
Castro-Henriques,António
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv HLA
kidney
MICA
rejection
survival
transplant
topic HLA
kidney
MICA
rejection
survival
transplant
description Background: Evidence supporting deleterious effect of preformed major histocompatibility class I chain-related A (MICA) antibodies in rejection incidence and graft survival is still unclear. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 554 kidney transplanted patients. Comparison between positive or negative for MICA antibodies patients was performed to characterize sensitizing triggers. Further classification according to pre-transplant flow cytometry-recorded anti-MICA and/or anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies was made to determine first year rejection incidence and graft survival. Multivariate analysis was applied to determine predictors for acute rejection. Results: Pre-formed anti-MICA antibodies were detected in 41 patients (7.4%). HLA sensitization, blood transfusions and pregnancies were frequently found in anti-MICA+ patients but only pre-formed anti-HLA class I antibodies showed independent association (OR 2.67, p = 0.02). Comparing to MICA-/HLA-, MICA-/HLA+ group presented significantly lower first year rejection-free survival (78.6% vs. 89.3%, p < 0.01), mostly occurred in the first six months, while no difference was found in MICA+/HLA- (88.9% vs. 89.3%, p = ns). MICA-/HLA+ showed independent impact in rejection (OR 2.09, p = 0.03), while no evidence was found in MICA+/HLA- (OR 1.08, p = ns). At 4 years, MICA-/HLA+ group presented lower graft survival (85.8% vs. 95.3%, p = 0.03). Again, no difference was found in MICA+/HLA- group (95.1% vs. 95.3%, p = ns). Conclusion: Our results do not support HLA-independent deleterious pathogenic role of pre-formed MICA antibodies on first year rejection incidence and graft survival
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-01692015000200005
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-01692015000200005
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-01692015000200005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Nefrologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Nefrologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Portuguese Journal of Nephrology &amp; Hypertension v.29 n.2 2015
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833593236447297536