Intraocular lens opacification after Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty: risk factors and outcomes after intraocular lens exchange

• Autor(a) principal: Moura-Coelho, Nuno
• Data de Publicação: 2024
• Outros Autores: Papa-Vettorazzi, Renato, Reyes, Alonso, Cunha, João Paulo, Dutra-Medeiros, Marco, Manero, Felicidad, Güell, José Luis
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.21/17632
• topic: Ophthalmology; Descemet membrane; Endothelial keratoplasty; Intraocular lens opacification; Risk factor

Purpose: To determine risk factors for intraocular lens opacification (IOLop) after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and to analyze clinical outcomes after IOL exchange. Methods: Cross-Sectional Study: Analysis of all cases of IOL exchange because of post-DMEK IOLop with a minimum of 6-month postoperative follow-up observed in the clinic between November 2021 and April 2022. The main outcomes analyzed at the study visit were changes in the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) best-corrected visual acuity after IOL exchange, endothelial cell loss (ECL), and graft survival. A historical cohort of 232 pseudophakic DMEK eyes was retrospectively analyzed to determine risk factors for post-DMEK IOLop. Results: Cross-Sectional Study: Four eyes were observed (median follow-up = 45 (35.5-86.8) months). IOL materials were hydrophilic acrylic IOLs in 2 eyes and hydrophobic-hydrophilic in the other 2. At the study visit, improvement in median best-corrected visual acuity after IOL exchange was statistically significant (0.25 (0.19-0.41) logMAR to 0.00 (0-0.10) logMAR; P = 0.041). ECL ranged between 57.7% and 85.3%, without cases of graft failure. In the historical cohort, 21 eyes (9.05%) had some IOLop. In the multivariate logistic regression model (105 eyes where IOL material data was available), IOLs with high water content material (odds ratio = 65.5, P = 0.0005) and rebubbling (odds ratio = 9.51, P = 0.0138) were independent risk factors for post-DMEK IOLop. Conclusions: Post-DMEK IOLop is infrequent, but a non-neglectable proportion of cases may require IOL explantation. IOL exchange is safe and effective in these eyes but may pose a risk for increased ECL. This study confirms that IOL material and the number of rebubblings are major risk factors for post-DMEK IOLop.