Data from a pre-publication independent replication initiative examining ten moral judgement effects

• Main Author: Tierney, Warren
• Publication Date: 2016
• Other Authors: Schweinsberg, Martin, Jordan, Jennifer, Kennedy, Deanna M., Qureshi, Israr, Sommer, S. Amy, Thornley, Nico, Madan, Nikhil, Vianello, Michelangelo, Awtrey, Eli, Zhu, Luke Lei, Diermeier, Daniel, Heinze, Justin E., Srinivasan, Malavika, Tannenbaum, David, Bivolaru, Eliza, Dana, Jason, Davis-Stober, Clintin P., Plessis, Christilene Du, Gronau, Quentin F., Hafenbrack, Andrew C., Liao, Eko Yi, Ly, Alexander, Marsman, Maarten, Murase, Toshio, Schaerer, Michael, Tworek, Christina M., Wagenmakers, Eric Jan, Wong, Lynn, Anderson, Tabitha, Bauman, Christopher W., Bedwell, Wendy L., Brescoll, Victoria, Canavan, Andrew, Chandler, Jesse J., Cheries, Erik, Cheryan, Sapna, Cheung, Felix, Cimpian, Andrei, Clark, Mark A., Cordon, Diana, Cushman, Fiery, Ditto, Peter H., Amell, Alice, Frick, Sarah E., Gamez-Djokic, Monica, Grady, Rebecca Hofstein, Graham, Jesse, Gu, Jun, Hahn, Adam, Hanson, Brittany E., Hartwich, Nicole J., Hein, Kristie, Inbar, Yoel, Jiang, Lily, Kellogg, Tehlyr, Legate, Nicole, Luoma, Timo P., Maibeucher, Heidi, Meindl, Peter, Miles, Jennifer, Mislin, Alexandra, Molden, Daniel C., Motyl, Matt, Newman, George, Ngo, Hoai Huong, Packham, Harvey, Ramsay, P. Scott, Ray, Jennifer L., Sackett, Aaron M., Sellier, Anne Laure, Sokolova, Tatiana, Sowden, Walter, Storage, Daniel, Sun, Xiaomin, Bavel, Jay J. Van, Washburn, Anthony N., Wei, Cong, Wetter, Erik, Wilson, Carlos T., Darroux, Sophie Charlotte, Uhlmann, Eric Luis
• Format: Article
• Language: eng
• Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
• Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/33801

We present the data from a crowdsourced project seeking to replicate findings in independent laboratories before (rather than after) they are published. In this Pre-Publication Independent Replication (PPIR) initiative, 25 research groups attempted to replicate 10 moral judgment effects from a single laboratory's research pipeline of unpublished findings. The 10 effects were investigated using online/lab surveys containing psychological manipulations (vignettes) followed by questionnaires. Results revealed a mix of reliable, unreliable, and culturally moderated findings. Unlike any previous replication project, this dataset includes the data from not only the replications but also from the original studies, creating a unique corpus that researchers can use to better understand reproducibility and irreproducibility in science.