Prostate cancer screening in the light of person-centered medicine
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2014 |
Format: | Article |
Language: | por |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v30i2.11286 |
Summary: | For several years, there has been debate regarding the cost effectiveness of prostate cancer screening. In 2012 the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against screening for prostate cancer, concluding that there is considerable evidence that this is not beneficial. The impact of the recommendations of USPSTF may be noted in the guidelines produced by other scientific societies. Clinicians need to know the evidence. The results of two randomized controlled trials, the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) and the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), form the largest body of current evidence, although both have limitations. An analysis of the results of these trials shows a small reduction in prostate cancer deaths among men who were screened. The first trial showed no reduction in mortality [RR = 1.09 (0.87 to 1.36)], while the latter trial showed that the number of deaths from prostate cancer was 5 per 1000 men in the group without screening and 4 per 1000 men undergoing screening [RR = 0.79 (0.68 to 0.91)] after 11 years of follow up. There is evidence that 100 to 200 men per 1000 men screened will have a false-positive test. Most of these men will undergo prostate biopsy. A large proportion of patients with prostatic carcinomas detected by screening may be subjected to surgery, radiotherapy or androgen deprivation therapy. This article highlights the evidence against systematic screening. It proposes a holistic approach involving the individual in the discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of prostate cancer screening. |
id |
RCAP_943fc22d1ded4027a7fb9d52fc0a31e3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.rpmgf.pt:article/11286 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Prostate cancer screening in the light of person-centered medicineRastreio do cancro prostático: o actual paradigma da medicina centrada na pessoaEarly Detection of CancerMass ScreeningProstatic NeoplasmsDetecção Precoce de CancroRastreio UniversalNeoplasia Prostática.For several years, there has been debate regarding the cost effectiveness of prostate cancer screening. In 2012 the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against screening for prostate cancer, concluding that there is considerable evidence that this is not beneficial. The impact of the recommendations of USPSTF may be noted in the guidelines produced by other scientific societies. Clinicians need to know the evidence. The results of two randomized controlled trials, the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) and the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), form the largest body of current evidence, although both have limitations. An analysis of the results of these trials shows a small reduction in prostate cancer deaths among men who were screened. The first trial showed no reduction in mortality [RR = 1.09 (0.87 to 1.36)], while the latter trial showed that the number of deaths from prostate cancer was 5 per 1000 men in the group without screening and 4 per 1000 men undergoing screening [RR = 0.79 (0.68 to 0.91)] after 11 years of follow up. There is evidence that 100 to 200 men per 1000 men screened will have a false-positive test. Most of these men will undergo prostate biopsy. A large proportion of patients with prostatic carcinomas detected by screening may be subjected to surgery, radiotherapy or androgen deprivation therapy. This article highlights the evidence against systematic screening. It proposes a holistic approach involving the individual in the discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of prostate cancer screening.Desde há alguns anos que o rastreio do cancro prostático através do Antigénio Específico da Próstata (PSA) tem emergido, entre a literatura médica, pela discussão em torno da sua razão efectividade/risco. A U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) fez, em 2012, uma recomendação contra o rastreio do cancro da próstata, concluindo que existe evidência considerável de que este não tem um saldo positivo quanto a vantagens/desvantagens. O impacto das recomendações da USPSTF poderá notar-se na maior atenção disponibilizada pelo médico na actualização quanto às normas produzidas pelas outras sociedades científicas. Parece ser muito relevante que o médico conheça no que a evidência científica se traduz. Os resultados dos ensaios clínicos Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) e European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) constituem a principal evidência, embora ambos apresentem limitações a apontar. De uma análise global destes estudos, sobressai que o número de homens que evitaram a morte por cancro prostático por terem sido submetidos ao rastreio foi reduzido. O primeiro estudo não mostrou qualquer redução da mortalidade [RR = 1,09 (0,87 – 1,36)], enquanto o segundo mostrou que o número de mortes por cancro prostático foi de 5 para 1000 homens no grupo sem rastreio e de 4 para 1000 homens nos submetidos a rastreio [RR = 0,79 (0,68 – 0,91)], após 11 anos de seguimento. Há evidência de que 100 a 200 em 1000 homens rastreados terão um falso positivo, a maioria dos quais será biop-sada. Entretanto, uma grande parte dos doentes com carcinomas prostáticos detectados por rastreio poderá ser submetida a cirurgia, radioterapia ou terapêutica de privação androgénica. Este artigo pretende salientar os aspectos que não recomendam a solicitação sistemática do PSA e favorecem uma abordagem holística que envolva a pessoa na ponderação das questões relativas ao rastreio e do saldo vantagens/desvantagens.Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar2014-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v30i2.11286https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v30i2.11286Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 30 No. 2 (2014): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 122-8Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 30 Núm. 2 (2014): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 122-8Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 30 N.º 2 (2014): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 122-82182-51812182-517310.32385/rpmgf.v30i2reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPporhttps://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/11286https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/11286/11009Santos, José Agostinhoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-17T11:59:46Zoai:ojs.rpmgf.pt:article/11286Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T18:51:53.112466Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Prostate cancer screening in the light of person-centered medicine Rastreio do cancro prostático: o actual paradigma da medicina centrada na pessoa |
title |
Prostate cancer screening in the light of person-centered medicine |
spellingShingle |
Prostate cancer screening in the light of person-centered medicine Santos, José Agostinho Early Detection of Cancer Mass Screening Prostatic Neoplasms Detecção Precoce de Cancro Rastreio Universal Neoplasia Prostática. |
title_short |
Prostate cancer screening in the light of person-centered medicine |
title_full |
Prostate cancer screening in the light of person-centered medicine |
title_fullStr |
Prostate cancer screening in the light of person-centered medicine |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prostate cancer screening in the light of person-centered medicine |
title_sort |
Prostate cancer screening in the light of person-centered medicine |
author |
Santos, José Agostinho |
author_facet |
Santos, José Agostinho |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, José Agostinho |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Early Detection of Cancer Mass Screening Prostatic Neoplasms Detecção Precoce de Cancro Rastreio Universal Neoplasia Prostática. |
topic |
Early Detection of Cancer Mass Screening Prostatic Neoplasms Detecção Precoce de Cancro Rastreio Universal Neoplasia Prostática. |
description |
For several years, there has been debate regarding the cost effectiveness of prostate cancer screening. In 2012 the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against screening for prostate cancer, concluding that there is considerable evidence that this is not beneficial. The impact of the recommendations of USPSTF may be noted in the guidelines produced by other scientific societies. Clinicians need to know the evidence. The results of two randomized controlled trials, the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) and the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), form the largest body of current evidence, although both have limitations. An analysis of the results of these trials shows a small reduction in prostate cancer deaths among men who were screened. The first trial showed no reduction in mortality [RR = 1.09 (0.87 to 1.36)], while the latter trial showed that the number of deaths from prostate cancer was 5 per 1000 men in the group without screening and 4 per 1000 men undergoing screening [RR = 0.79 (0.68 to 0.91)] after 11 years of follow up. There is evidence that 100 to 200 men per 1000 men screened will have a false-positive test. Most of these men will undergo prostate biopsy. A large proportion of patients with prostatic carcinomas detected by screening may be subjected to surgery, radiotherapy or androgen deprivation therapy. This article highlights the evidence against systematic screening. It proposes a holistic approach involving the individual in the discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of prostate cancer screening. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-04-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v30i2.11286 https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v30i2.11286 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v30i2.11286 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/11286 https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/11286/11009 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 30 No. 2 (2014): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 122-8 Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 30 Núm. 2 (2014): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 122-8 Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 30 N.º 2 (2014): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 122-8 2182-5181 2182-5173 10.32385/rpmgf.v30i2 reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833597716681195520 |