Prostate cancer screening in the light of person-centered medicine

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Santos, José Agostinho
Publication Date: 2014
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v30i2.11286
Summary: For several years, there has been debate regarding the cost effectiveness of prostate cancer screening. In 2012 the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against screening for prostate cancer, concluding that there is considerable evidence that this is not beneficial. The impact of the recommendations of USPSTF may be noted in the guidelines produced by other scientific societies. Clinicians need to know the evidence. The results of two randomized controlled trials, the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) and the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), form the largest body of current evidence, although both have limitations. An analysis of the results of these trials shows a small reduction in prostate cancer deaths among men who were screened. The first trial showed no reduction in mortality [RR = 1.09 (0.87 to 1.36)], while the latter trial showed that the number of deaths from prostate cancer was 5 per 1000 men in the group without screening and 4 per 1000 men undergoing screening [RR = 0.79 (0.68 to 0.91)] after 11 years of follow up. There is evidence that 100 to 200 men per 1000 men screened will have a false-positive test. Most of these men will undergo prostate biopsy. A large proportion of patients with prostatic carcinomas detected by screening may be subjected to surgery, radiotherapy or androgen deprivation therapy. This article highlights the evidence against systematic screening. It proposes a holistic approach involving the individual in the discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of prostate cancer screening.
id RCAP_943fc22d1ded4027a7fb9d52fc0a31e3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.rpmgf.pt:article/11286
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Prostate cancer screening in the light of person-centered medicineRastreio do cancro prostático: o actual paradigma da medicina centrada na pessoaEarly Detection of CancerMass ScreeningProstatic NeoplasmsDetecção Precoce de CancroRastreio UniversalNeoplasia Prostática.For several years, there has been debate regarding the cost effectiveness of prostate cancer screening. In 2012 the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against screening for prostate cancer, concluding that there is considerable evidence that this is not beneficial. The impact of the recommendations of USPSTF may be noted in the guidelines produced by other scientific societies. Clinicians need to know the evidence. The results of two randomized controlled trials, the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) and the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), form the largest body of current evidence, although both have limitations. An analysis of the results of these trials shows a small reduction in prostate cancer deaths among men who were screened. The first trial showed no reduction in mortality [RR = 1.09 (0.87 to 1.36)], while the latter trial showed that the number of deaths from prostate cancer was 5 per 1000 men in the group without screening and 4 per 1000 men undergoing screening [RR = 0.79 (0.68 to 0.91)] after 11 years of follow up. There is evidence that 100 to 200 men per 1000 men screened will have a false-positive test. Most of these men will undergo prostate biopsy. A large proportion of patients with prostatic carcinomas detected by screening may be subjected to surgery, radiotherapy or androgen deprivation therapy. This article highlights the evidence against systematic screening. It proposes a holistic approach involving the individual in the discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of prostate cancer screening.Desde há alguns anos que o rastreio do cancro prostático através do Antigénio Específico da Próstata (PSA) tem emergido, entre a literatura médica, pela discussão em torno da sua razão efectividade/risco. A U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) fez, em 2012, uma recomendação contra o rastreio do cancro da próstata, concluindo que existe evidência considerável de que este não tem um saldo positivo quanto a vantagens/desvantagens. O impacto das recomendações da USPSTF poderá notar-se na maior atenção disponibilizada pelo médico na actualização quanto às normas produzidas pelas outras sociedades científicas. Parece ser muito relevante que o médico conheça no que a evidência científica se traduz. Os resultados dos ensaios clínicos Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) e European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) constituem a principal evidência, embora ambos apresentem limitações a apontar. De uma análise global destes estudos, sobressai que o número de homens que evitaram a morte por cancro prostático por terem sido submetidos ao rastreio foi reduzido. O primeiro estudo não mostrou qualquer redução da mortalidade [RR = 1,09 (0,87 – 1,36)], enquanto o segundo mostrou que o número de mortes por cancro prostático foi de 5 para 1000 homens no grupo sem rastreio e de 4 para 1000 homens nos submetidos a rastreio [RR = 0,79 (0,68 – 0,91)], após 11 anos de seguimento. Há evidência de que 100 a 200 em 1000 homens rastreados terão um falso positivo, a maioria dos quais será biop-sada. Entretanto, uma grande parte dos doentes com carcinomas prostáticos detectados por rastreio poderá ser submetida a cirurgia, radioterapia ou terapêutica de privação androgénica. Este artigo pretende salientar os aspectos que não recomendam a solicitação sistemática do PSA e favorecem uma abordagem holística que envolva a pessoa na ponderação das questões relativas ao rastreio e do saldo vantagens/desvantagens.Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar2014-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v30i2.11286https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v30i2.11286Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 30 No. 2 (2014): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 122-8Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 30 Núm. 2 (2014): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 122-8Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 30 N.º 2 (2014): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 122-82182-51812182-517310.32385/rpmgf.v30i2reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPporhttps://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/11286https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/11286/11009Santos, José Agostinhoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-17T11:59:46Zoai:ojs.rpmgf.pt:article/11286Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T18:51:53.112466Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prostate cancer screening in the light of person-centered medicine
Rastreio do cancro prostático: o actual paradigma da medicina centrada na pessoa
title Prostate cancer screening in the light of person-centered medicine
spellingShingle Prostate cancer screening in the light of person-centered medicine
Santos, José Agostinho
Early Detection of Cancer
Mass Screening
Prostatic Neoplasms
Detecção Precoce de Cancro
Rastreio Universal
Neoplasia Prostática.
title_short Prostate cancer screening in the light of person-centered medicine
title_full Prostate cancer screening in the light of person-centered medicine
title_fullStr Prostate cancer screening in the light of person-centered medicine
title_full_unstemmed Prostate cancer screening in the light of person-centered medicine
title_sort Prostate cancer screening in the light of person-centered medicine
author Santos, José Agostinho
author_facet Santos, José Agostinho
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, José Agostinho
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Early Detection of Cancer
Mass Screening
Prostatic Neoplasms
Detecção Precoce de Cancro
Rastreio Universal
Neoplasia Prostática.
topic Early Detection of Cancer
Mass Screening
Prostatic Neoplasms
Detecção Precoce de Cancro
Rastreio Universal
Neoplasia Prostática.
description For several years, there has been debate regarding the cost effectiveness of prostate cancer screening. In 2012 the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against screening for prostate cancer, concluding that there is considerable evidence that this is not beneficial. The impact of the recommendations of USPSTF may be noted in the guidelines produced by other scientific societies. Clinicians need to know the evidence. The results of two randomized controlled trials, the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) and the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), form the largest body of current evidence, although both have limitations. An analysis of the results of these trials shows a small reduction in prostate cancer deaths among men who were screened. The first trial showed no reduction in mortality [RR = 1.09 (0.87 to 1.36)], while the latter trial showed that the number of deaths from prostate cancer was 5 per 1000 men in the group without screening and 4 per 1000 men undergoing screening [RR = 0.79 (0.68 to 0.91)] after 11 years of follow up. There is evidence that 100 to 200 men per 1000 men screened will have a false-positive test. Most of these men will undergo prostate biopsy. A large proportion of patients with prostatic carcinomas detected by screening may be subjected to surgery, radiotherapy or androgen deprivation therapy. This article highlights the evidence against systematic screening. It proposes a holistic approach involving the individual in the discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of prostate cancer screening.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-04-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v30i2.11286
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v30i2.11286
url https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v30i2.11286
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/11286
https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/11286/11009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 30 No. 2 (2014): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 122-8
Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 30 Núm. 2 (2014): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 122-8
Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 30 N.º 2 (2014): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 122-8
2182-5181
2182-5173
10.32385/rpmgf.v30i2
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833597716681195520