Enhancing the comparability between part-list cueing and collaborative recall

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Garrido, M. V.
Publication Date: 2012
Other Authors: Garcia-Marques, L., Hamilton, D.
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/26507
Summary: The effects of part-list cueing and of collaborative recall in memory performance have been recently addressed as parallel phenomena. Notably they both impair recall (and boost frequency estimates) and they have been explained by the same underlying mechanisms. However the comparability between the two paradigms is hindered by a number of procedural differences. The main contribution of this paper is the introduction of a new paradigm that makes standard part-list cueing and collaborative recall more comparable. In our study we compared free recall and frequency estimates of participants in a non-cueing condition with the same performance in a standard partlist cueing condition and in a condition in which part-list cues were gradually presented during recall (as it occurs in collaborative recall). Results indicate that the effects of part-list cueing continued to be reliable in both cueing conditions. Namely, recall was impaired and frequency estimates were boosted relatively to a non-cueing condition. The results obtained with this new method that enhances the direct comparability of the two paradigms, provides further evidence for the parallel between the two effects.
id RCAP_9180826d40a9455a34dd5bcae35d323e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/26507
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Enhancing the comparability between part-list cueing and collaborative recallPart-list cueingGradual-list cueingCollaborative inhibitionPerson-memoryThe effects of part-list cueing and of collaborative recall in memory performance have been recently addressed as parallel phenomena. Notably they both impair recall (and boost frequency estimates) and they have been explained by the same underlying mechanisms. However the comparability between the two paradigms is hindered by a number of procedural differences. The main contribution of this paper is the introduction of a new paradigm that makes standard part-list cueing and collaborative recall more comparable. In our study we compared free recall and frequency estimates of participants in a non-cueing condition with the same performance in a standard partlist cueing condition and in a condition in which part-list cues were gradually presented during recall (as it occurs in collaborative recall). Results indicate that the effects of part-list cueing continued to be reliable in both cueing conditions. Namely, recall was impaired and frequency estimates were boosted relatively to a non-cueing condition. The results obtained with this new method that enhances the direct comparability of the two paradigms, provides further evidence for the parallel between the two effects.Hogrefe and Huber Publishers2022-11-29T12:05:41Z2012-01-01T00:00:00Z20122022-11-29T12:06:20Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/26507eng1618-316910.1027/1618-3169/a000144Garrido, M. V.Garcia-Marques, L.Hamilton, D.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-07-07T03:38:19Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/26507Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T18:29:34.539867Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Enhancing the comparability between part-list cueing and collaborative recall
title Enhancing the comparability between part-list cueing and collaborative recall
spellingShingle Enhancing the comparability between part-list cueing and collaborative recall
Garrido, M. V.
Part-list cueing
Gradual-list cueing
Collaborative inhibition
Person-memory
title_short Enhancing the comparability between part-list cueing and collaborative recall
title_full Enhancing the comparability between part-list cueing and collaborative recall
title_fullStr Enhancing the comparability between part-list cueing and collaborative recall
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing the comparability between part-list cueing and collaborative recall
title_sort Enhancing the comparability between part-list cueing and collaborative recall
author Garrido, M. V.
author_facet Garrido, M. V.
Garcia-Marques, L.
Hamilton, D.
author_role author
author2 Garcia-Marques, L.
Hamilton, D.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Garrido, M. V.
Garcia-Marques, L.
Hamilton, D.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Part-list cueing
Gradual-list cueing
Collaborative inhibition
Person-memory
topic Part-list cueing
Gradual-list cueing
Collaborative inhibition
Person-memory
description The effects of part-list cueing and of collaborative recall in memory performance have been recently addressed as parallel phenomena. Notably they both impair recall (and boost frequency estimates) and they have been explained by the same underlying mechanisms. However the comparability between the two paradigms is hindered by a number of procedural differences. The main contribution of this paper is the introduction of a new paradigm that makes standard part-list cueing and collaborative recall more comparable. In our study we compared free recall and frequency estimates of participants in a non-cueing condition with the same performance in a standard partlist cueing condition and in a condition in which part-list cues were gradually presented during recall (as it occurs in collaborative recall). Results indicate that the effects of part-list cueing continued to be reliable in both cueing conditions. Namely, recall was impaired and frequency estimates were boosted relatively to a non-cueing condition. The results obtained with this new method that enhances the direct comparability of the two paradigms, provides further evidence for the parallel between the two effects.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-01-01T00:00:00Z
2012
2022-11-29T12:05:41Z
2022-11-29T12:06:20Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/26507
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/26507
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1618-3169
10.1027/1618-3169/a000144
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hogrefe and Huber Publishers
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hogrefe and Huber Publishers
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833597456306143232