Defining Polyamory
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2021 |
Other Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/142987 |
Summary: | This study aimed to analyze laypeople’s defnitions of polyamory and compare defnitions presented by people who are not willing to engage in consensual non-monogamy (CNM) and those who are or are willing to be in a CNM relationship. This exploratory qualitative study used data collected from a convenience sample through a web survey, where people answered the question “What does polyamory mean?” We conducted thematic analysis to examine patterns in meaning and used demographic data to compare themes among groups. The fnal sample comprised 463 participants aged 18–66 years (M=32.19, SD=10.02), mostly heterosexual (60%). Of the total sample, 54% were in a monogamous relationship, followed by 21% not in a relationship, and 13% in a non-monogamous relationship. Analysis showed that people defne polyamory mostly as a set of behaviors in a relationship, followed by the potential of multiple relationships or feelings for multiple people. Defnitions also include emotional, sexual, and ethical aspects. People in CNM relationships are more likely to defne polyamory as constituting a potential form of relating, focus more on interpersonal feelings and ethics, and include consent in their defnitions than those unwilling to engage in CNM. People in CNM relationships also focus particularly on the non-central role of sex within these relationships, which might challenge assumptions about sexuality in these relationships in clinical and research settings. |
id |
RCAP_7fc98d3125765d63e39d1d0a63b6c934 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:run.unl.pt:10362/142987 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Defining PolyamoryA Thematic Analysis of Lay People’s DefinitionsPolyamoryLaypeopleThematic analysisConsensual non-monogamyThis study aimed to analyze laypeople’s defnitions of polyamory and compare defnitions presented by people who are not willing to engage in consensual non-monogamy (CNM) and those who are or are willing to be in a CNM relationship. This exploratory qualitative study used data collected from a convenience sample through a web survey, where people answered the question “What does polyamory mean?” We conducted thematic analysis to examine patterns in meaning and used demographic data to compare themes among groups. The fnal sample comprised 463 participants aged 18–66 years (M=32.19, SD=10.02), mostly heterosexual (60%). Of the total sample, 54% were in a monogamous relationship, followed by 21% not in a relationship, and 13% in a non-monogamous relationship. Analysis showed that people defne polyamory mostly as a set of behaviors in a relationship, followed by the potential of multiple relationships or feelings for multiple people. Defnitions also include emotional, sexual, and ethical aspects. People in CNM relationships are more likely to defne polyamory as constituting a potential form of relating, focus more on interpersonal feelings and ethics, and include consent in their defnitions than those unwilling to engage in CNM. People in CNM relationships also focus particularly on the non-central role of sex within these relationships, which might challenge assumptions about sexuality in these relationships in clinical and research settings.Centro Interdisciplinar de Ciências Sociais (CICS.NOVA - NOVA FCSH)RUNCardoso, DanielPascoal, Patricia M.Maiochi, Francisco Hertel2022-08-11T22:31:53Z2021-05-272021-05-27T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article14application/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/142987eng0004-0002PURE: 45883693https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02002-yinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-05-22T18:04:21Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/142987Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T17:34:52.047624Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Defining Polyamory A Thematic Analysis of Lay People’s Definitions |
title |
Defining Polyamory |
spellingShingle |
Defining Polyamory Cardoso, Daniel Polyamory Laypeople Thematic analysis Consensual non-monogamy |
title_short |
Defining Polyamory |
title_full |
Defining Polyamory |
title_fullStr |
Defining Polyamory |
title_full_unstemmed |
Defining Polyamory |
title_sort |
Defining Polyamory |
author |
Cardoso, Daniel |
author_facet |
Cardoso, Daniel Pascoal, Patricia M. Maiochi, Francisco Hertel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pascoal, Patricia M. Maiochi, Francisco Hertel |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Interdisciplinar de Ciências Sociais (CICS.NOVA - NOVA FCSH) RUN |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cardoso, Daniel Pascoal, Patricia M. Maiochi, Francisco Hertel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Polyamory Laypeople Thematic analysis Consensual non-monogamy |
topic |
Polyamory Laypeople Thematic analysis Consensual non-monogamy |
description |
This study aimed to analyze laypeople’s defnitions of polyamory and compare defnitions presented by people who are not willing to engage in consensual non-monogamy (CNM) and those who are or are willing to be in a CNM relationship. This exploratory qualitative study used data collected from a convenience sample through a web survey, where people answered the question “What does polyamory mean?” We conducted thematic analysis to examine patterns in meaning and used demographic data to compare themes among groups. The fnal sample comprised 463 participants aged 18–66 years (M=32.19, SD=10.02), mostly heterosexual (60%). Of the total sample, 54% were in a monogamous relationship, followed by 21% not in a relationship, and 13% in a non-monogamous relationship. Analysis showed that people defne polyamory mostly as a set of behaviors in a relationship, followed by the potential of multiple relationships or feelings for multiple people. Defnitions also include emotional, sexual, and ethical aspects. People in CNM relationships are more likely to defne polyamory as constituting a potential form of relating, focus more on interpersonal feelings and ethics, and include consent in their defnitions than those unwilling to engage in CNM. People in CNM relationships also focus particularly on the non-central role of sex within these relationships, which might challenge assumptions about sexuality in these relationships in clinical and research settings. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-27 2021-05-27T00:00:00Z 2022-08-11T22:31:53Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/142987 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/142987 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0004-0002 PURE: 45883693 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02002-y |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
14 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833596811113136128 |