Defining Polyamory

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cardoso, Daniel
Publication Date: 2021
Other Authors: Pascoal, Patricia M., Maiochi, Francisco Hertel
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/142987
Summary: This study aimed to analyze laypeople’s defnitions of polyamory and compare defnitions presented by people who are not willing to engage in consensual non-monogamy (CNM) and those who are or are willing to be in a CNM relationship. This exploratory qualitative study used data collected from a convenience sample through a web survey, where people answered the question “What does polyamory mean?” We conducted thematic analysis to examine patterns in meaning and used demographic data to compare themes among groups. The fnal sample comprised 463 participants aged 18–66 years (M=32.19, SD=10.02), mostly heterosexual (60%). Of the total sample, 54% were in a monogamous relationship, followed by 21% not in a relationship, and 13% in a non-monogamous relationship. Analysis showed that people defne polyamory mostly as a set of behaviors in a relationship, followed by the potential of multiple relationships or feelings for multiple people. Defnitions also include emotional, sexual, and ethical aspects. People in CNM relationships are more likely to defne polyamory as constituting a potential form of relating, focus more on interpersonal feelings and ethics, and include consent in their defnitions than those unwilling to engage in CNM. People in CNM relationships also focus particularly on the non-central role of sex within these relationships, which might challenge assumptions about sexuality in these relationships in clinical and research settings.
id RCAP_7fc98d3125765d63e39d1d0a63b6c934
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/142987
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Defining PolyamoryA Thematic Analysis of Lay People’s DefinitionsPolyamoryLaypeopleThematic analysisConsensual non-monogamyThis study aimed to analyze laypeople’s defnitions of polyamory and compare defnitions presented by people who are not willing to engage in consensual non-monogamy (CNM) and those who are or are willing to be in a CNM relationship. This exploratory qualitative study used data collected from a convenience sample through a web survey, where people answered the question “What does polyamory mean?” We conducted thematic analysis to examine patterns in meaning and used demographic data to compare themes among groups. The fnal sample comprised 463 participants aged 18–66 years (M=32.19, SD=10.02), mostly heterosexual (60%). Of the total sample, 54% were in a monogamous relationship, followed by 21% not in a relationship, and 13% in a non-monogamous relationship. Analysis showed that people defne polyamory mostly as a set of behaviors in a relationship, followed by the potential of multiple relationships or feelings for multiple people. Defnitions also include emotional, sexual, and ethical aspects. People in CNM relationships are more likely to defne polyamory as constituting a potential form of relating, focus more on interpersonal feelings and ethics, and include consent in their defnitions than those unwilling to engage in CNM. People in CNM relationships also focus particularly on the non-central role of sex within these relationships, which might challenge assumptions about sexuality in these relationships in clinical and research settings.Centro Interdisciplinar de Ciências Sociais (CICS.NOVA - NOVA FCSH)RUNCardoso, DanielPascoal, Patricia M.Maiochi, Francisco Hertel2022-08-11T22:31:53Z2021-05-272021-05-27T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article14application/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/142987eng0004-0002PURE: 45883693https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02002-yinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-05-22T18:04:21Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/142987Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T17:34:52.047624Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Defining Polyamory
A Thematic Analysis of Lay People’s Definitions
title Defining Polyamory
spellingShingle Defining Polyamory
Cardoso, Daniel
Polyamory
Laypeople
Thematic analysis
Consensual non-monogamy
title_short Defining Polyamory
title_full Defining Polyamory
title_fullStr Defining Polyamory
title_full_unstemmed Defining Polyamory
title_sort Defining Polyamory
author Cardoso, Daniel
author_facet Cardoso, Daniel
Pascoal, Patricia M.
Maiochi, Francisco Hertel
author_role author
author2 Pascoal, Patricia M.
Maiochi, Francisco Hertel
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Centro Interdisciplinar de Ciências Sociais (CICS.NOVA - NOVA FCSH)
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cardoso, Daniel
Pascoal, Patricia M.
Maiochi, Francisco Hertel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Polyamory
Laypeople
Thematic analysis
Consensual non-monogamy
topic Polyamory
Laypeople
Thematic analysis
Consensual non-monogamy
description This study aimed to analyze laypeople’s defnitions of polyamory and compare defnitions presented by people who are not willing to engage in consensual non-monogamy (CNM) and those who are or are willing to be in a CNM relationship. This exploratory qualitative study used data collected from a convenience sample through a web survey, where people answered the question “What does polyamory mean?” We conducted thematic analysis to examine patterns in meaning and used demographic data to compare themes among groups. The fnal sample comprised 463 participants aged 18–66 years (M=32.19, SD=10.02), mostly heterosexual (60%). Of the total sample, 54% were in a monogamous relationship, followed by 21% not in a relationship, and 13% in a non-monogamous relationship. Analysis showed that people defne polyamory mostly as a set of behaviors in a relationship, followed by the potential of multiple relationships or feelings for multiple people. Defnitions also include emotional, sexual, and ethical aspects. People in CNM relationships are more likely to defne polyamory as constituting a potential form of relating, focus more on interpersonal feelings and ethics, and include consent in their defnitions than those unwilling to engage in CNM. People in CNM relationships also focus particularly on the non-central role of sex within these relationships, which might challenge assumptions about sexuality in these relationships in clinical and research settings.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-27
2021-05-27T00:00:00Z
2022-08-11T22:31:53Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/142987
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/142987
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0004-0002
PURE: 45883693
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02002-y
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 14
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833596811113136128