From 'Due Diligence' to 'Adequate Redress'

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bright, Claire
Publication Date: 2022
Other Authors: Turner, Stephen
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/165435
Summary: This article considers the case for compulsory corporate human rights and environmental insurance. It approaches it within the context of the need for more effective, efficient and just systems of redress for the victims of human rights and environmental harm that is caused by companies where they have operations or supply chains in single or multiple jurisdictions. Developments within the field of corporate responsibility for human rights and environmental issues have led to a variety of different initiatives that range from the UN ‘protect, respect, and remedy’ framework and the associated human rights due diligence (HRDD) framework, to specific legal developments in certain jurisdictions and other schemes developed by international organisations, as well as by civil-society and businesses themselves. From the perspective of corporate law, these changes have taken place within a legal framework that has certain features that have hindered the availability of remedies for victims of associated human rights and environmental harm. This article problematises the issue of redress for corporate human rights violations and environmental degradation within the context of international developments in this field. It considers whether there is a prima facie case for the establishment of a comprehensive compulsory human rights and environmental insurance regime for companies that would require them to operate to a high standard of care in their operations, and which would ultimately provide a more straightforward system of redress for victims.
id RCAP_77da92c706f6ecdd8ff60dc82d3082e4
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/165435
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling From 'Due Diligence' to 'Adequate Redress'Towards Compulsory Human Rights and Environmental Insurance for Companies?due diligencecompulsory liability insurancehuman rights due diligenceenvironmentcorporate accountabilitySDG 13 - Climate ActionSDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic GrowthSDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong InstitutionsThis article considers the case for compulsory corporate human rights and environmental insurance. It approaches it within the context of the need for more effective, efficient and just systems of redress for the victims of human rights and environmental harm that is caused by companies where they have operations or supply chains in single or multiple jurisdictions. Developments within the field of corporate responsibility for human rights and environmental issues have led to a variety of different initiatives that range from the UN ‘protect, respect, and remedy’ framework and the associated human rights due diligence (HRDD) framework, to specific legal developments in certain jurisdictions and other schemes developed by international organisations, as well as by civil-society and businesses themselves. From the perspective of corporate law, these changes have taken place within a legal framework that has certain features that have hindered the availability of remedies for victims of associated human rights and environmental harm. This article problematises the issue of redress for corporate human rights violations and environmental degradation within the context of international developments in this field. It considers whether there is a prima facie case for the establishment of a comprehensive compulsory human rights and environmental insurance regime for companies that would require them to operate to a high standard of care in their operations, and which would ultimately provide a more straightforward system of redress for victims.NOVA School of Law|Faculdade de Direito (NSL|FD)Centro de Investigação e Desenvolvimento sobre Direito e Sociedade (CEDIS)RUNBright, ClaireTurner, Stephen2024-03-25T23:33:18Z20222022-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article21application/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/165435engPURE: 76928606https://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-12341487info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-05-22T18:19:56Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/165435Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T17:50:42.482438Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv From 'Due Diligence' to 'Adequate Redress'
Towards Compulsory Human Rights and Environmental Insurance for Companies?
title From 'Due Diligence' to 'Adequate Redress'
spellingShingle From 'Due Diligence' to 'Adequate Redress'
Bright, Claire
due diligence
compulsory liability insurance
human rights due diligence
environment
corporate accountability
SDG 13 - Climate Action
SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
title_short From 'Due Diligence' to 'Adequate Redress'
title_full From 'Due Diligence' to 'Adequate Redress'
title_fullStr From 'Due Diligence' to 'Adequate Redress'
title_full_unstemmed From 'Due Diligence' to 'Adequate Redress'
title_sort From 'Due Diligence' to 'Adequate Redress'
author Bright, Claire
author_facet Bright, Claire
Turner, Stephen
author_role author
author2 Turner, Stephen
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv NOVA School of Law|Faculdade de Direito (NSL|FD)
Centro de Investigação e Desenvolvimento sobre Direito e Sociedade (CEDIS)
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bright, Claire
Turner, Stephen
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv due diligence
compulsory liability insurance
human rights due diligence
environment
corporate accountability
SDG 13 - Climate Action
SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
topic due diligence
compulsory liability insurance
human rights due diligence
environment
corporate accountability
SDG 13 - Climate Action
SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
description This article considers the case for compulsory corporate human rights and environmental insurance. It approaches it within the context of the need for more effective, efficient and just systems of redress for the victims of human rights and environmental harm that is caused by companies where they have operations or supply chains in single or multiple jurisdictions. Developments within the field of corporate responsibility for human rights and environmental issues have led to a variety of different initiatives that range from the UN ‘protect, respect, and remedy’ framework and the associated human rights due diligence (HRDD) framework, to specific legal developments in certain jurisdictions and other schemes developed by international organisations, as well as by civil-society and businesses themselves. From the perspective of corporate law, these changes have taken place within a legal framework that has certain features that have hindered the availability of remedies for victims of associated human rights and environmental harm. This article problematises the issue of redress for corporate human rights violations and environmental degradation within the context of international developments in this field. It considers whether there is a prima facie case for the establishment of a comprehensive compulsory human rights and environmental insurance regime for companies that would require them to operate to a high standard of care in their operations, and which would ultimately provide a more straightforward system of redress for victims.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
2024-03-25T23:33:18Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/165435
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/165435
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv PURE: 76928606
https://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-12341487
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 21
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833597005823213568