Coping with COVID-19: Measuring self-efficacy, collective efficacy and proxy efficacy beliefs

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Silva,Andrêze
Publication Date: 2023
Other Authors: Oliveira,Juliana Célia de, Barbosa,Altemir José Gonçalves, Mendonça,Roseane
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0874-20492023000100012
Summary: Abstract Investigating efficacy beliefs for coping with COVID-19 can be helpful when proposing interventions that contribute to mitigate the disease. Six scales of efficacy beliefs for coping with COVID-19 were built: self-efficacy; family and community collective efficacy; and proxy efficacy to the municipal, state and federal governments. To obtain evidence of validity based on the internal structure and reliability estimates of these measures, 518 participants completed an online form. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that all scales had a unidimensional structure. Cronbach's alphas ranged from .819 to .968. Although positive correlations predominated between the scores of the six scales, the magnitudes were, in general, weak or moderate, showing that they were distinct constructs. These scores differed from each other, with levels of efficacy decreasing as individual control over the actions necessary to mitigate COVID-19 decreased. Thus, the six scales initially presented satisfactory psychometric properties. Study-related limitations, implications and recommendations are also presented.
id RCAP_721bc42e5a3a0f52af9e06b1d91a27b8
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0874-20492023000100012
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Coping with COVID-19: Measuring self-efficacy, collective efficacy and proxy efficacy beliefsCOVID-19Efficacy BeliefsMeasurementValidityReliabilityAbstract Investigating efficacy beliefs for coping with COVID-19 can be helpful when proposing interventions that contribute to mitigate the disease. Six scales of efficacy beliefs for coping with COVID-19 were built: self-efficacy; family and community collective efficacy; and proxy efficacy to the municipal, state and federal governments. To obtain evidence of validity based on the internal structure and reliability estimates of these measures, 518 participants completed an online form. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that all scales had a unidimensional structure. Cronbach's alphas ranged from .819 to .968. Although positive correlations predominated between the scores of the six scales, the magnitudes were, in general, weak or moderate, showing that they were distinct constructs. These scores differed from each other, with levels of efficacy decreasing as individual control over the actions necessary to mitigate COVID-19 decreased. Thus, the six scales initially presented satisfactory psychometric properties. Study-related limitations, implications and recommendations are also presented.Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia (APP)Edições Colibri2023-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0874-20492023000100012Psicologia v.37 n.1 2023reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0874-20492023000100012Silva,AndrêzeOliveira,Juliana Célia deBarbosa,Altemir José GonçalvesMendonça,Roseaneinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:14:01Zoai:scielo:S0874-20492023000100012Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T13:02:02.705190Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Coping with COVID-19: Measuring self-efficacy, collective efficacy and proxy efficacy beliefs
title Coping with COVID-19: Measuring self-efficacy, collective efficacy and proxy efficacy beliefs
spellingShingle Coping with COVID-19: Measuring self-efficacy, collective efficacy and proxy efficacy beliefs
Silva,Andrêze
COVID-19
Efficacy Beliefs
Measurement
Validity
Reliability
title_short Coping with COVID-19: Measuring self-efficacy, collective efficacy and proxy efficacy beliefs
title_full Coping with COVID-19: Measuring self-efficacy, collective efficacy and proxy efficacy beliefs
title_fullStr Coping with COVID-19: Measuring self-efficacy, collective efficacy and proxy efficacy beliefs
title_full_unstemmed Coping with COVID-19: Measuring self-efficacy, collective efficacy and proxy efficacy beliefs
title_sort Coping with COVID-19: Measuring self-efficacy, collective efficacy and proxy efficacy beliefs
author Silva,Andrêze
author_facet Silva,Andrêze
Oliveira,Juliana Célia de
Barbosa,Altemir José Gonçalves
Mendonça,Roseane
author_role author
author2 Oliveira,Juliana Célia de
Barbosa,Altemir José Gonçalves
Mendonça,Roseane
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,Andrêze
Oliveira,Juliana Célia de
Barbosa,Altemir José Gonçalves
Mendonça,Roseane
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv COVID-19
Efficacy Beliefs
Measurement
Validity
Reliability
topic COVID-19
Efficacy Beliefs
Measurement
Validity
Reliability
description Abstract Investigating efficacy beliefs for coping with COVID-19 can be helpful when proposing interventions that contribute to mitigate the disease. Six scales of efficacy beliefs for coping with COVID-19 were built: self-efficacy; family and community collective efficacy; and proxy efficacy to the municipal, state and federal governments. To obtain evidence of validity based on the internal structure and reliability estimates of these measures, 518 participants completed an online form. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that all scales had a unidimensional structure. Cronbach's alphas ranged from .819 to .968. Although positive correlations predominated between the scores of the six scales, the magnitudes were, in general, weak or moderate, showing that they were distinct constructs. These scores differed from each other, with levels of efficacy decreasing as individual control over the actions necessary to mitigate COVID-19 decreased. Thus, the six scales initially presented satisfactory psychometric properties. Study-related limitations, implications and recommendations are also presented.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0874-20492023000100012
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0874-20492023000100012
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0874-20492023000100012
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia (APP)
Edições Colibri
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia (APP)
Edições Colibri
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psicologia v.37 n.1 2023
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833593369482231808