Coping with COVID-19: Measuring self-efficacy, collective efficacy and proxy efficacy beliefs
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2023 |
Other Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | https://doi.org/10.17575/psicologia.1695 |
Summary: | Investigating efficacy beliefs for coping with COVID-19 can be helpful when proposing interventions that contribute to mitigate the disease. Six scales of efficacy beliefs for coping with COVID-19 were built: self-efficacy; family and community collective efficacy; and proxy efficacy to the municipal, state and federal governments. To obtain evidence of validity based on the internal structure and reliability estimates of these measures, 518 participants completed an online form. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that all scales had a unidimensional structure. Cronbach's alphas ranged from .819 to .968. Although positive correlations predominated between the scores of the six scales, the magnitudes were, in general, weak or moderate, showing that they were distinct constructs. These scores differed from each other, with levels of efficacy decreasing as individual control over the actions necessary to mitigate COVID-19 decreased. Thus, the six scales initially presented satisfactory psychometric properties. Study-related limitations, implications and recommendations are also presented. |
id |
RCAP_007673acb024d9c2285ca4480cc41cdb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.appsicologia.org:article/1695 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Coping with COVID-19: Measuring self-efficacy, collective efficacy and proxy efficacy beliefsCoping with COVID-19: Measuring self-efficacy, collective efficacy and proxy efficacy beliefsCOVID-19Efficacy BeliefsMeasurementValidityReliabilityCOVID-19Efficacy BeliefsMeasurementValidityReliabilityInvestigating efficacy beliefs for coping with COVID-19 can be helpful when proposing interventions that contribute to mitigate the disease. Six scales of efficacy beliefs for coping with COVID-19 were built: self-efficacy; family and community collective efficacy; and proxy efficacy to the municipal, state and federal governments. To obtain evidence of validity based on the internal structure and reliability estimates of these measures, 518 participants completed an online form. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that all scales had a unidimensional structure. Cronbach's alphas ranged from .819 to .968. Although positive correlations predominated between the scores of the six scales, the magnitudes were, in general, weak or moderate, showing that they were distinct constructs. These scores differed from each other, with levels of efficacy decreasing as individual control over the actions necessary to mitigate COVID-19 decreased. Thus, the six scales initially presented satisfactory psychometric properties. Study-related limitations, implications and recommendations are also presented.Investigating efficacy beliefs for coping with COVID-19 can be helpful when proposing interventions that contribute to mitigate the disease. Six scales of efficacy beliefs for coping with COVID-19 were built: self-efficacy; family and community collective efficacy; and proxy efficacy to the municipal, state and federal governments. To obtain evidence of validity based on the internal structure and reliability estimates of these measures, 518 participants completed an online form. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that all scales had a unidimensional structure. Cronbach's alphas ranged from .819 to .968. Although positive correlations predominated between the scores of the six scales, the magnitudes were, in general, weak or moderate, showing that they were distinct constructs. These scores differed from each other, with levels of efficacy decreasing as individual control over the actions necessary to mitigate COVID-19 decreased. Thus, the six scales initially presented satisfactory psychometric properties. Study-related limitations, implications and recommendations are also presented.Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia2023-07-03info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17575/psicologia.1695https://doi.org/10.17575/psicologia.1695PSICOLOGIA; Vol. 37 No. 1 (2023); 12-19PSICOLOGIA; Vol. 37 N.º 1 (2023); 12-192183-24710874-2049reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revista.appsicologia.org/index.php/rpsicologia/article/view/1695https://revista.appsicologia.org/index.php/rpsicologia/article/view/1695/1083https://revista.appsicologia.org/index.php/rpsicologia/article/view/1695/1099Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 PSICOLOGIAinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Andrêze Cristine do NascimentoOliveira, Juliana Célia deBarbosa, Altemir José GonçalvesMendonça, Roseane Ribeiro2023-07-06T12:45:13Zoai:oai.appsicologia.org:article/1695Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T11:02:36.768969Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Coping with COVID-19: Measuring self-efficacy, collective efficacy and proxy efficacy beliefs Coping with COVID-19: Measuring self-efficacy, collective efficacy and proxy efficacy beliefs |
title |
Coping with COVID-19: Measuring self-efficacy, collective efficacy and proxy efficacy beliefs |
spellingShingle |
Coping with COVID-19: Measuring self-efficacy, collective efficacy and proxy efficacy beliefs Silva, Andrêze Cristine do Nascimento COVID-19 Efficacy Beliefs Measurement Validity Reliability COVID-19 Efficacy Beliefs Measurement Validity Reliability |
title_short |
Coping with COVID-19: Measuring self-efficacy, collective efficacy and proxy efficacy beliefs |
title_full |
Coping with COVID-19: Measuring self-efficacy, collective efficacy and proxy efficacy beliefs |
title_fullStr |
Coping with COVID-19: Measuring self-efficacy, collective efficacy and proxy efficacy beliefs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Coping with COVID-19: Measuring self-efficacy, collective efficacy and proxy efficacy beliefs |
title_sort |
Coping with COVID-19: Measuring self-efficacy, collective efficacy and proxy efficacy beliefs |
author |
Silva, Andrêze Cristine do Nascimento |
author_facet |
Silva, Andrêze Cristine do Nascimento Oliveira, Juliana Célia de Barbosa, Altemir José Gonçalves Mendonça, Roseane Ribeiro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira, Juliana Célia de Barbosa, Altemir José Gonçalves Mendonça, Roseane Ribeiro |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Andrêze Cristine do Nascimento Oliveira, Juliana Célia de Barbosa, Altemir José Gonçalves Mendonça, Roseane Ribeiro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
COVID-19 Efficacy Beliefs Measurement Validity Reliability COVID-19 Efficacy Beliefs Measurement Validity Reliability |
topic |
COVID-19 Efficacy Beliefs Measurement Validity Reliability COVID-19 Efficacy Beliefs Measurement Validity Reliability |
description |
Investigating efficacy beliefs for coping with COVID-19 can be helpful when proposing interventions that contribute to mitigate the disease. Six scales of efficacy beliefs for coping with COVID-19 were built: self-efficacy; family and community collective efficacy; and proxy efficacy to the municipal, state and federal governments. To obtain evidence of validity based on the internal structure and reliability estimates of these measures, 518 participants completed an online form. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that all scales had a unidimensional structure. Cronbach's alphas ranged from .819 to .968. Although positive correlations predominated between the scores of the six scales, the magnitudes were, in general, weak or moderate, showing that they were distinct constructs. These scores differed from each other, with levels of efficacy decreasing as individual control over the actions necessary to mitigate COVID-19 decreased. Thus, the six scales initially presented satisfactory psychometric properties. Study-related limitations, implications and recommendations are also presented. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-07-03 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17575/psicologia.1695 https://doi.org/10.17575/psicologia.1695 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17575/psicologia.1695 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.appsicologia.org/index.php/rpsicologia/article/view/1695 https://revista.appsicologia.org/index.php/rpsicologia/article/view/1695/1083 https://revista.appsicologia.org/index.php/rpsicologia/article/view/1695/1099 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 PSICOLOGIA info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 PSICOLOGIA |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
PSICOLOGIA; Vol. 37 No. 1 (2023); 12-19 PSICOLOGIA; Vol. 37 N.º 1 (2023); 12-19 2183-2471 0874-2049 reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833591511969693696 |