Biomarkers for classification and risk assessment of pancreatic cystic neoplasms

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Antunes, Sandra de Jesus Reis Faias
Publication Date: 2020
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/11138
Summary: Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are increasing incidental findings due to increased ageing of the population and widespread use of imaging. The main problem in clinical practice has to do with distinguishing the high-risk premalignant and malignant cysts that require surgical treatment from the benign or low-grade dysplastic cysts, which should not be over-treated and might not even require surveillance. The goal of the present work is to perform a comprehensive analysis of biomarkers and diagnostic approaches by Endoscopic Ultrasound with Fine-needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA), in a cohort of patients harboring mostly low-risk cysts under surveillance, which are far more frequent in clinical practice. The PCF analysis performed in this cohort includes studies of genomics (DNA mutations), epigenomics (methylation analysis), metabolomics (glucose), and proteomics (CEA, chromogranin A, NSE), with putative biomarkers encompassing the diagnosis of mucinous and malignant cysts, that require surveillance and surgical resection, respectively. We performed a first meta-analysis comparing current diagnostic methods - CEA and cytology - with KRAS mutations for the diagnosis of mucinous cysts. CEA was the best test for clinically significant cysts (AUC=0.69), cytology performed better in malignant cysts (AUC=0.78), surpassing KRAS mutations (AUC=0.53 and AUC=0.56, respectively). In a second meta-analysis we compared the accuracy of molecular analysis versus micro forceps biopsy (MFB) in the diagnosis of PCLs. The two approaches were identical for diagnosing benign cysts, but molecular analysis was superior for diagnosing both low and high-risk mucinous cysts. In addition to these two meta-analyses, we performed a retrospective study evaluating the added value of KRAS and GNAS mutations in PCF of 52 frozen PCF samples. We conclude that, as compared with conventional tests, these had no added value in the differential diagnosis of PCLs. In another publication, we compared glucose level in PCF with CEA in 82 patients. For mucinous cyst diagnosis, a CEA >192 ng/ml showed an AUC of 0.84 while glucose <50 mg/dl revealed an AUC of 0.86. Besides its higher accuracy, PCF glucose evaluated “on site” with a glucometer is easy, immediate, and requires a minimal amount of PCF. In the next study we sought to determine whether a second EUS-FNA changed the diagnosis or management of pancreatic cysts. We compared the outcome of 105 patients with a single EUS-FNA with that of 23 patients who had a second EUS-FNA. EUS-FNA may be recommended, as it changed management toward surgery in approximately 20% of the patients, particularly with diagnosis of cystic NETs. Following these results, we explored the role of EUS-FNA in small PCLs (<3 cm) in 115 patients with PCLs <3 cm who underwent EUS-FNA. 19/115 were submitted to surgery with 15 malignant or premalignant lesions and the remaining 4 were benign lesions. We conclude that EUS-FNA in lesions <3 cm may improve outcome and cost-effectiveness of surveillance programs, as it confirmed malignancy in 2 out of 5 resected lesions, while it also diagnosed benign cysts who could be released from these programs. In a pilot study with 16 patients, including 4 cystic NETs we aimed at assessing the value of Chromogranin A (CroA) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) levels in PCF. CroA and NSE levels were higher in cystic NETs with an AUC of 0.94 for CroA and 1 for NSE. These are promising biomarkers to identify pancreatic cystic NETs. Finally, we studied epigenetic changes in the diagnosis of malignant cysts. Methylation changes of GNAS locus were evaluated to understand whether they may contribute to malignant progression of PCLs. Fifty-two samples of PCF were studied. We observed that GNAS locus methylation changes were significantly associated with malignancy. This is the first study to identify methylation changes in the GNAS locus improving diagnosis of malignant PCLs. We end this work proposing a revised diagnostic organogram of PCLs established by current guidelines, that incorporates the results obtained in this dissertation’s research.
id RCAP_587461f0f0235eeb9fc572d8a63f4467
oai_identifier_str oai:ubibliorum.ubi.pt:10400.6/11138
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Biomarkers for classification and risk assessment of pancreatic cystic neoplasmsQuisto do pâncreasEcoendoscopia com punção com agulha fina (EUS-FNA)Líquido quístico pancreáticoCEACitologiaAnálise MolecularBiomarcadorPancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are increasing incidental findings due to increased ageing of the population and widespread use of imaging. The main problem in clinical practice has to do with distinguishing the high-risk premalignant and malignant cysts that require surgical treatment from the benign or low-grade dysplastic cysts, which should not be over-treated and might not even require surveillance. The goal of the present work is to perform a comprehensive analysis of biomarkers and diagnostic approaches by Endoscopic Ultrasound with Fine-needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA), in a cohort of patients harboring mostly low-risk cysts under surveillance, which are far more frequent in clinical practice. The PCF analysis performed in this cohort includes studies of genomics (DNA mutations), epigenomics (methylation analysis), metabolomics (glucose), and proteomics (CEA, chromogranin A, NSE), with putative biomarkers encompassing the diagnosis of mucinous and malignant cysts, that require surveillance and surgical resection, respectively. We performed a first meta-analysis comparing current diagnostic methods - CEA and cytology - with KRAS mutations for the diagnosis of mucinous cysts. CEA was the best test for clinically significant cysts (AUC=0.69), cytology performed better in malignant cysts (AUC=0.78), surpassing KRAS mutations (AUC=0.53 and AUC=0.56, respectively). In a second meta-analysis we compared the accuracy of molecular analysis versus micro forceps biopsy (MFB) in the diagnosis of PCLs. The two approaches were identical for diagnosing benign cysts, but molecular analysis was superior for diagnosing both low and high-risk mucinous cysts. In addition to these two meta-analyses, we performed a retrospective study evaluating the added value of KRAS and GNAS mutations in PCF of 52 frozen PCF samples. We conclude that, as compared with conventional tests, these had no added value in the differential diagnosis of PCLs. In another publication, we compared glucose level in PCF with CEA in 82 patients. For mucinous cyst diagnosis, a CEA >192 ng/ml showed an AUC of 0.84 while glucose <50 mg/dl revealed an AUC of 0.86. Besides its higher accuracy, PCF glucose evaluated “on site” with a glucometer is easy, immediate, and requires a minimal amount of PCF. In the next study we sought to determine whether a second EUS-FNA changed the diagnosis or management of pancreatic cysts. We compared the outcome of 105 patients with a single EUS-FNA with that of 23 patients who had a second EUS-FNA. EUS-FNA may be recommended, as it changed management toward surgery in approximately 20% of the patients, particularly with diagnosis of cystic NETs. Following these results, we explored the role of EUS-FNA in small PCLs (<3 cm) in 115 patients with PCLs <3 cm who underwent EUS-FNA. 19/115 were submitted to surgery with 15 malignant or premalignant lesions and the remaining 4 were benign lesions. We conclude that EUS-FNA in lesions <3 cm may improve outcome and cost-effectiveness of surveillance programs, as it confirmed malignancy in 2 out of 5 resected lesions, while it also diagnosed benign cysts who could be released from these programs. In a pilot study with 16 patients, including 4 cystic NETs we aimed at assessing the value of Chromogranin A (CroA) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) levels in PCF. CroA and NSE levels were higher in cystic NETs with an AUC of 0.94 for CroA and 1 for NSE. These are promising biomarkers to identify pancreatic cystic NETs. Finally, we studied epigenetic changes in the diagnosis of malignant cysts. Methylation changes of GNAS locus were evaluated to understand whether they may contribute to malignant progression of PCLs. Fifty-two samples of PCF were studied. We observed that GNAS locus methylation changes were significantly associated with malignancy. This is the first study to identify methylation changes in the GNAS locus improving diagnosis of malignant PCLs. We end this work proposing a revised diagnostic organogram of PCLs established by current guidelines, that incorporates the results obtained in this dissertation’s research.Pascoal, Maria Paula Guerreiro ChavesCravo, MaríliauBibliorumAntunes, Sandra de Jesus Reis Faias2021-03-31T13:28:06Z2020-12-142020-12-14T00:00:00Zdoctoral thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/11138urn:tid:101610939enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-03-11T15:39:39Zoai:ubibliorum.ubi.pt:10400.6/11138Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T01:27:52.139266Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Biomarkers for classification and risk assessment of pancreatic cystic neoplasms
title Biomarkers for classification and risk assessment of pancreatic cystic neoplasms
spellingShingle Biomarkers for classification and risk assessment of pancreatic cystic neoplasms
Antunes, Sandra de Jesus Reis Faias
Quisto do pâncreas
Ecoendoscopia com punção com agulha fina (EUS-FNA)
Líquido quístico pancreático
CEA
Citologia
Análise Molecular
Biomarcador
title_short Biomarkers for classification and risk assessment of pancreatic cystic neoplasms
title_full Biomarkers for classification and risk assessment of pancreatic cystic neoplasms
title_fullStr Biomarkers for classification and risk assessment of pancreatic cystic neoplasms
title_full_unstemmed Biomarkers for classification and risk assessment of pancreatic cystic neoplasms
title_sort Biomarkers for classification and risk assessment of pancreatic cystic neoplasms
author Antunes, Sandra de Jesus Reis Faias
author_facet Antunes, Sandra de Jesus Reis Faias
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Pascoal, Maria Paula Guerreiro Chaves
Cravo, Marília
uBibliorum
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Antunes, Sandra de Jesus Reis Faias
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Quisto do pâncreas
Ecoendoscopia com punção com agulha fina (EUS-FNA)
Líquido quístico pancreático
CEA
Citologia
Análise Molecular
Biomarcador
topic Quisto do pâncreas
Ecoendoscopia com punção com agulha fina (EUS-FNA)
Líquido quístico pancreático
CEA
Citologia
Análise Molecular
Biomarcador
description Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are increasing incidental findings due to increased ageing of the population and widespread use of imaging. The main problem in clinical practice has to do with distinguishing the high-risk premalignant and malignant cysts that require surgical treatment from the benign or low-grade dysplastic cysts, which should not be over-treated and might not even require surveillance. The goal of the present work is to perform a comprehensive analysis of biomarkers and diagnostic approaches by Endoscopic Ultrasound with Fine-needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA), in a cohort of patients harboring mostly low-risk cysts under surveillance, which are far more frequent in clinical practice. The PCF analysis performed in this cohort includes studies of genomics (DNA mutations), epigenomics (methylation analysis), metabolomics (glucose), and proteomics (CEA, chromogranin A, NSE), with putative biomarkers encompassing the diagnosis of mucinous and malignant cysts, that require surveillance and surgical resection, respectively. We performed a first meta-analysis comparing current diagnostic methods - CEA and cytology - with KRAS mutations for the diagnosis of mucinous cysts. CEA was the best test for clinically significant cysts (AUC=0.69), cytology performed better in malignant cysts (AUC=0.78), surpassing KRAS mutations (AUC=0.53 and AUC=0.56, respectively). In a second meta-analysis we compared the accuracy of molecular analysis versus micro forceps biopsy (MFB) in the diagnosis of PCLs. The two approaches were identical for diagnosing benign cysts, but molecular analysis was superior for diagnosing both low and high-risk mucinous cysts. In addition to these two meta-analyses, we performed a retrospective study evaluating the added value of KRAS and GNAS mutations in PCF of 52 frozen PCF samples. We conclude that, as compared with conventional tests, these had no added value in the differential diagnosis of PCLs. In another publication, we compared glucose level in PCF with CEA in 82 patients. For mucinous cyst diagnosis, a CEA >192 ng/ml showed an AUC of 0.84 while glucose <50 mg/dl revealed an AUC of 0.86. Besides its higher accuracy, PCF glucose evaluated “on site” with a glucometer is easy, immediate, and requires a minimal amount of PCF. In the next study we sought to determine whether a second EUS-FNA changed the diagnosis or management of pancreatic cysts. We compared the outcome of 105 patients with a single EUS-FNA with that of 23 patients who had a second EUS-FNA. EUS-FNA may be recommended, as it changed management toward surgery in approximately 20% of the patients, particularly with diagnosis of cystic NETs. Following these results, we explored the role of EUS-FNA in small PCLs (<3 cm) in 115 patients with PCLs <3 cm who underwent EUS-FNA. 19/115 were submitted to surgery with 15 malignant or premalignant lesions and the remaining 4 were benign lesions. We conclude that EUS-FNA in lesions <3 cm may improve outcome and cost-effectiveness of surveillance programs, as it confirmed malignancy in 2 out of 5 resected lesions, while it also diagnosed benign cysts who could be released from these programs. In a pilot study with 16 patients, including 4 cystic NETs we aimed at assessing the value of Chromogranin A (CroA) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) levels in PCF. CroA and NSE levels were higher in cystic NETs with an AUC of 0.94 for CroA and 1 for NSE. These are promising biomarkers to identify pancreatic cystic NETs. Finally, we studied epigenetic changes in the diagnosis of malignant cysts. Methylation changes of GNAS locus were evaluated to understand whether they may contribute to malignant progression of PCLs. Fifty-two samples of PCF were studied. We observed that GNAS locus methylation changes were significantly associated with malignancy. This is the first study to identify methylation changes in the GNAS locus improving diagnosis of malignant PCLs. We end this work proposing a revised diagnostic organogram of PCLs established by current guidelines, that incorporates the results obtained in this dissertation’s research.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-14
2020-12-14T00:00:00Z
2021-03-31T13:28:06Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv doctoral thesis
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/11138
urn:tid:101610939
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/11138
identifier_str_mv urn:tid:101610939
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833600994444836864