Dimensions of Social Equality in Paid Parental Leave Policy Design: Comparing Australia and Japan

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Whitehouse, Gillian
Publication Date: 2021
Other Authors: Nakazato, Hideki
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v9i2.3863
Summary: Paid parental leave policies in both Australia and Japan fit within Dobrotić and Blum’s (2020) classification of a selective employment-based entitlement model, thus offering an extension of that category beyond Europe and illustrating the wide variation possible within it. In this article we develop indices for comparing employment-based parental leave policies on three dimensions of social equality: inclusion, gender equality and redistribution. This combination offers an extension of classificatory schemes for parental leave policies and a broader basis for comparative analysis. We compare Australia and Japan on these indices and present a qualitative exploration of the origins and implications of their similarities and differences. The analysis draws attention to tensions between the three indices, illustrating intersecting and conflicting influences on the potential for paid parental leave entitlements to contribute to the amelioration of social inequalities. Overall, the comparison highlights drivers of difference within employment-based entitlement systems and underlines the need for complementary measures to advance egalitarian outcomes.
id RCAP_18580e06b2d1ab8461e27cb42315e9d9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3863
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Dimensions of Social Equality in Paid Parental Leave Policy Design: Comparing Australia and JapanAustralia; gender equality; inclusion; Japan; leave policy design; paid parental leave; redistribution; social equalityPaid parental leave policies in both Australia and Japan fit within Dobrotić and Blum’s (2020) classification of a selective employment-based entitlement model, thus offering an extension of that category beyond Europe and illustrating the wide variation possible within it. In this article we develop indices for comparing employment-based parental leave policies on three dimensions of social equality: inclusion, gender equality and redistribution. This combination offers an extension of classificatory schemes for parental leave policies and a broader basis for comparative analysis. We compare Australia and Japan on these indices and present a qualitative exploration of the origins and implications of their similarities and differences. The analysis draws attention to tensions between the three indices, illustrating intersecting and conflicting influences on the potential for paid parental leave entitlements to contribute to the amelioration of social inequalities. Overall, the comparison highlights drivers of difference within employment-based entitlement systems and underlines the need for complementary measures to advance egalitarian outcomes.Cogitatio2021-06-11info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v9i2.3863oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3863Social Inclusion; Vol 9, No 2 (2021): The Inclusiveness of Social Rights: The Case of Parental Leave Policies; 288-2992183-2803reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/3863https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v9i2.3863https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/3863/3863https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/downloadSuppFile/3863/1734Copyright (c) 2021 Gillian Whitehouse, Hideki Nakazatoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWhitehouse, GillianNakazato, Hideki2022-12-20T11:00:27Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3863Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T10:44:09.240309Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Dimensions of Social Equality in Paid Parental Leave Policy Design: Comparing Australia and Japan
title Dimensions of Social Equality in Paid Parental Leave Policy Design: Comparing Australia and Japan
spellingShingle Dimensions of Social Equality in Paid Parental Leave Policy Design: Comparing Australia and Japan
Whitehouse, Gillian
Australia; gender equality; inclusion; Japan; leave policy design; paid parental leave; redistribution; social equality
title_short Dimensions of Social Equality in Paid Parental Leave Policy Design: Comparing Australia and Japan
title_full Dimensions of Social Equality in Paid Parental Leave Policy Design: Comparing Australia and Japan
title_fullStr Dimensions of Social Equality in Paid Parental Leave Policy Design: Comparing Australia and Japan
title_full_unstemmed Dimensions of Social Equality in Paid Parental Leave Policy Design: Comparing Australia and Japan
title_sort Dimensions of Social Equality in Paid Parental Leave Policy Design: Comparing Australia and Japan
author Whitehouse, Gillian
author_facet Whitehouse, Gillian
Nakazato, Hideki
author_role author
author2 Nakazato, Hideki
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Whitehouse, Gillian
Nakazato, Hideki
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Australia; gender equality; inclusion; Japan; leave policy design; paid parental leave; redistribution; social equality
topic Australia; gender equality; inclusion; Japan; leave policy design; paid parental leave; redistribution; social equality
description Paid parental leave policies in both Australia and Japan fit within Dobrotić and Blum’s (2020) classification of a selective employment-based entitlement model, thus offering an extension of that category beyond Europe and illustrating the wide variation possible within it. In this article we develop indices for comparing employment-based parental leave policies on three dimensions of social equality: inclusion, gender equality and redistribution. This combination offers an extension of classificatory schemes for parental leave policies and a broader basis for comparative analysis. We compare Australia and Japan on these indices and present a qualitative exploration of the origins and implications of their similarities and differences. The analysis draws attention to tensions between the three indices, illustrating intersecting and conflicting influences on the potential for paid parental leave entitlements to contribute to the amelioration of social inequalities. Overall, the comparison highlights drivers of difference within employment-based entitlement systems and underlines the need for complementary measures to advance egalitarian outcomes.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-11
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v9i2.3863
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3863
url https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v9i2.3863
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3863
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/3863
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v9i2.3863
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/3863/3863
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/downloadSuppFile/3863/1734
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Gillian Whitehouse, Hideki Nakazato
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Gillian Whitehouse, Hideki Nakazato
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Social Inclusion; Vol 9, No 2 (2021): The Inclusiveness of Social Rights: The Case of Parental Leave Policies; 288-299
2183-2803
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833591181811908608