Dimensions of Social Equality in Paid Parental Leave Policy Design: Comparing Australia and Japan
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2021 |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v9i2.3863 |
Summary: | Paid parental leave policies in both Australia and Japan fit within Dobrotić and Blum’s (2020) classification of a selective employment-based entitlement model, thus offering an extension of that category beyond Europe and illustrating the wide variation possible within it. In this article we develop indices for comparing employment-based parental leave policies on three dimensions of social equality: inclusion, gender equality and redistribution. This combination offers an extension of classificatory schemes for parental leave policies and a broader basis for comparative analysis. We compare Australia and Japan on these indices and present a qualitative exploration of the origins and implications of their similarities and differences. The analysis draws attention to tensions between the three indices, illustrating intersecting and conflicting influences on the potential for paid parental leave entitlements to contribute to the amelioration of social inequalities. Overall, the comparison highlights drivers of difference within employment-based entitlement systems and underlines the need for complementary measures to advance egalitarian outcomes. |
id |
RCAP_18580e06b2d1ab8461e27cb42315e9d9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3863 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Dimensions of Social Equality in Paid Parental Leave Policy Design: Comparing Australia and JapanAustralia; gender equality; inclusion; Japan; leave policy design; paid parental leave; redistribution; social equalityPaid parental leave policies in both Australia and Japan fit within Dobrotić and Blum’s (2020) classification of a selective employment-based entitlement model, thus offering an extension of that category beyond Europe and illustrating the wide variation possible within it. In this article we develop indices for comparing employment-based parental leave policies on three dimensions of social equality: inclusion, gender equality and redistribution. This combination offers an extension of classificatory schemes for parental leave policies and a broader basis for comparative analysis. We compare Australia and Japan on these indices and present a qualitative exploration of the origins and implications of their similarities and differences. The analysis draws attention to tensions between the three indices, illustrating intersecting and conflicting influences on the potential for paid parental leave entitlements to contribute to the amelioration of social inequalities. Overall, the comparison highlights drivers of difference within employment-based entitlement systems and underlines the need for complementary measures to advance egalitarian outcomes.Cogitatio2021-06-11info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v9i2.3863oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3863Social Inclusion; Vol 9, No 2 (2021): The Inclusiveness of Social Rights: The Case of Parental Leave Policies; 288-2992183-2803reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/3863https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v9i2.3863https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/3863/3863https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/downloadSuppFile/3863/1734Copyright (c) 2021 Gillian Whitehouse, Hideki Nakazatoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWhitehouse, GillianNakazato, Hideki2022-12-20T11:00:27Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3863Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T10:44:09.240309Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Dimensions of Social Equality in Paid Parental Leave Policy Design: Comparing Australia and Japan |
title |
Dimensions of Social Equality in Paid Parental Leave Policy Design: Comparing Australia and Japan |
spellingShingle |
Dimensions of Social Equality in Paid Parental Leave Policy Design: Comparing Australia and Japan Whitehouse, Gillian Australia; gender equality; inclusion; Japan; leave policy design; paid parental leave; redistribution; social equality |
title_short |
Dimensions of Social Equality in Paid Parental Leave Policy Design: Comparing Australia and Japan |
title_full |
Dimensions of Social Equality in Paid Parental Leave Policy Design: Comparing Australia and Japan |
title_fullStr |
Dimensions of Social Equality in Paid Parental Leave Policy Design: Comparing Australia and Japan |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dimensions of Social Equality in Paid Parental Leave Policy Design: Comparing Australia and Japan |
title_sort |
Dimensions of Social Equality in Paid Parental Leave Policy Design: Comparing Australia and Japan |
author |
Whitehouse, Gillian |
author_facet |
Whitehouse, Gillian Nakazato, Hideki |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nakazato, Hideki |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Whitehouse, Gillian Nakazato, Hideki |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Australia; gender equality; inclusion; Japan; leave policy design; paid parental leave; redistribution; social equality |
topic |
Australia; gender equality; inclusion; Japan; leave policy design; paid parental leave; redistribution; social equality |
description |
Paid parental leave policies in both Australia and Japan fit within Dobrotić and Blum’s (2020) classification of a selective employment-based entitlement model, thus offering an extension of that category beyond Europe and illustrating the wide variation possible within it. In this article we develop indices for comparing employment-based parental leave policies on three dimensions of social equality: inclusion, gender equality and redistribution. This combination offers an extension of classificatory schemes for parental leave policies and a broader basis for comparative analysis. We compare Australia and Japan on these indices and present a qualitative exploration of the origins and implications of their similarities and differences. The analysis draws attention to tensions between the three indices, illustrating intersecting and conflicting influences on the potential for paid parental leave entitlements to contribute to the amelioration of social inequalities. Overall, the comparison highlights drivers of difference within employment-based entitlement systems and underlines the need for complementary measures to advance egalitarian outcomes. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-11 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v9i2.3863 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3863 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v9i2.3863 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3863 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/3863 https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v9i2.3863 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/3863/3863 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/downloadSuppFile/3863/1734 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Gillian Whitehouse, Hideki Nakazato info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Gillian Whitehouse, Hideki Nakazato |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Social Inclusion; Vol 9, No 2 (2021): The Inclusiveness of Social Rights: The Case of Parental Leave Policies; 288-299 2183-2803 reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833591181811908608 |