Abtractization of incidental constitutional control, the effectiveness of decisions and the constitutional mutation of article 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution: a response for criticism
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2020 |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | por |
Source: | Revista do Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (Online) |
Download full: | https://revistadoidcc.com.br/index.php/revista/article/view/68 |
Summary: | The work finds an answer for the criticism about the constitutional mutation of article 52, X in Brazil’s Constitution position thought by part of the doctrine and endorsed by the Supreme Court in your current composition. The comprehension proposes made a system from the decisions of the Court to be respected from objective or incidental control. In spite of that, one cannot forget about some existing institutes in the national law, reason why they cannot be dematerialized. For the purpose, introduces the definitions and more important concepts for the main theme followed about constitutional control and constitutional mutation, followed by the performance of each power in constitutional control and the exposed of all criticism that reduces the importance of this meaning. By the consequence of this, the article pretends a harmonic understanding of the mutation and the current constitutional control system by an appreciation of precedent as an evolutional jurisprudential tool. |
id |
IDDC_e716773df8afe4c992511f498aaad824 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.revistadoidcc.com.br:article/68 |
network_acronym_str |
IDDC |
network_name_str |
Revista do Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Abtractization of incidental constitutional control, the effectiveness of decisions and the constitutional mutation of article 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution: a response for criticismAbstrativização do controle incidental, a eficácia das decisões e a mutação constitucional do art. 52, X da CF: uma resposta às críticasControle de constitucionalidadeabstrativização do controle incidentalart. 52, X da CFConstitutional controlabstractization of incidental constitutional controlart. 52, X of Brazil’s ConstitutionThe work finds an answer for the criticism about the constitutional mutation of article 52, X in Brazil’s Constitution position thought by part of the doctrine and endorsed by the Supreme Court in your current composition. The comprehension proposes made a system from the decisions of the Court to be respected from objective or incidental control. In spite of that, one cannot forget about some existing institutes in the national law, reason why they cannot be dematerialized. For the purpose, introduces the definitions and more important concepts for the main theme followed about constitutional control and constitutional mutation, followed by the performance of each power in constitutional control and the exposed of all criticism that reduces the importance of this meaning. By the consequence of this, the article pretends a harmonic understanding of the mutation and the current constitutional control system by an appreciation of precedent as an evolutional jurisprudential tool. O trabalho procura responder às críticas sobre a mutação constitucional do artigo 52, X da CF, compreensão que fora pensada por parte da doutrina e encampada pelo STF em sua composição atual. A interpretação do inciso propõe a sistematização das decisões do tribunal e seu consequente respeito independentemente de o processo ser objetivo ou incidental. Apesar disso, não se pode esquecer acerca de alguns institutos existentes no direito pátrio, motivo pelo qual não podem ser desmaterializados. Para tanto, introduzimos o assunto com os conceitos mais importantes para a compreensão do tema de controle de constitucionalidade e a mutação constitucional, seguida do papel dos poderes nesse controle e a exposição de todas críticas relevantes que infirmam a referida posição. Como consequência do objetivo, o artigo propõe uma tentativa de harmonização dessa mutação com o sistema de controle de constitucionalidade existente, bem como a própria constituição, com a valorização do precedente como ferramenta para evolução jurisprudencial. Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania2020-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionOriginal articleArtículo originalArtigo originalapplication/pdfhttps://revistadoidcc.com.br/index.php/revista/article/view/6810.48159/revistadoidcc.v5n1.valerio.benfattiRevista do Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania; v. 5 n. 1 (2020): Revista do Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania; 111-1272596-00751808-9143reponame:Revista do Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (Online)instname:Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (IDCC)instacron:IDDCporhttps://revistadoidcc.com.br/index.php/revista/article/view/68/67Copyright (c) 2020 Guilherme Lucas Valério, Fábio Fernandes Neves Benfattihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessValério, Guilherme Lucas Benfatti, Fábio Fernandes Neves 2020-09-01T11:04:55Zoai:ojs2.revistadoidcc.com.br:article/68Revistahttp://revistadoidcc.com.br/ONGhttps://revistadoidcc.com.br/index.php/revista/oaiidcc.revista@gmail.com2596-00751808-9143opendoar:2020-09-01T11:04:55Revista do Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (Online) - Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (IDCC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Abtractization of incidental constitutional control, the effectiveness of decisions and the constitutional mutation of article 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution: a response for criticism Abstrativização do controle incidental, a eficácia das decisões e a mutação constitucional do art. 52, X da CF: uma resposta às críticas |
title |
Abtractization of incidental constitutional control, the effectiveness of decisions and the constitutional mutation of article 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution: a response for criticism |
spellingShingle |
Abtractization of incidental constitutional control, the effectiveness of decisions and the constitutional mutation of article 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution: a response for criticism Valério, Guilherme Lucas Controle de constitucionalidade abstrativização do controle incidental art. 52, X da CF Constitutional control abstractization of incidental constitutional control art. 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution |
title_short |
Abtractization of incidental constitutional control, the effectiveness of decisions and the constitutional mutation of article 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution: a response for criticism |
title_full |
Abtractization of incidental constitutional control, the effectiveness of decisions and the constitutional mutation of article 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution: a response for criticism |
title_fullStr |
Abtractization of incidental constitutional control, the effectiveness of decisions and the constitutional mutation of article 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution: a response for criticism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Abtractization of incidental constitutional control, the effectiveness of decisions and the constitutional mutation of article 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution: a response for criticism |
title_sort |
Abtractization of incidental constitutional control, the effectiveness of decisions and the constitutional mutation of article 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution: a response for criticism |
author |
Valério, Guilherme Lucas |
author_facet |
Valério, Guilherme Lucas Benfatti, Fábio Fernandes Neves |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Benfatti, Fábio Fernandes Neves |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Valério, Guilherme Lucas Benfatti, Fábio Fernandes Neves |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Controle de constitucionalidade abstrativização do controle incidental art. 52, X da CF Constitutional control abstractization of incidental constitutional control art. 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution |
topic |
Controle de constitucionalidade abstrativização do controle incidental art. 52, X da CF Constitutional control abstractization of incidental constitutional control art. 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution |
description |
The work finds an answer for the criticism about the constitutional mutation of article 52, X in Brazil’s Constitution position thought by part of the doctrine and endorsed by the Supreme Court in your current composition. The comprehension proposes made a system from the decisions of the Court to be respected from objective or incidental control. In spite of that, one cannot forget about some existing institutes in the national law, reason why they cannot be dematerialized. For the purpose, introduces the definitions and more important concepts for the main theme followed about constitutional control and constitutional mutation, followed by the performance of each power in constitutional control and the exposed of all criticism that reduces the importance of this meaning. By the consequence of this, the article pretends a harmonic understanding of the mutation and the current constitutional control system by an appreciation of precedent as an evolutional jurisprudential tool. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Original article Artículo original Artigo original |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadoidcc.com.br/index.php/revista/article/view/68 10.48159/revistadoidcc.v5n1.valerio.benfatti |
url |
https://revistadoidcc.com.br/index.php/revista/article/view/68 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.48159/revistadoidcc.v5n1.valerio.benfatti |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadoidcc.com.br/index.php/revista/article/view/68/67 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Guilherme Lucas Valério, Fábio Fernandes Neves Benfatti https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Guilherme Lucas Valério, Fábio Fernandes Neves Benfatti https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania; v. 5 n. 1 (2020): Revista do Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania; 111-127 2596-0075 1808-9143 reponame:Revista do Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (Online) instname:Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (IDCC) instacron:IDDC |
instname_str |
Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (IDCC) |
instacron_str |
IDDC |
institution |
IDDC |
reponame_str |
Revista do Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (Online) |
collection |
Revista do Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (Online) - Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (IDCC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
idcc.revista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1837009990975488000 |