Abtractization of incidental constitutional control, the effectiveness of decisions and the constitutional mutation of article 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution: a response for criticism

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Valério, Guilherme Lucas
Publication Date: 2020
Other Authors: Benfatti, Fábio Fernandes Neves
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Revista do Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (Online)
Download full: https://revistadoidcc.com.br/index.php/revista/article/view/68
Summary: The work finds an answer for the criticism about the constitutional mutation of article 52, X in Brazil’s Constitution position thought by part of the doctrine and endorsed by the Supreme Court in your current composition. The comprehension proposes made a system from the decisions of the Court to be respected from objective or incidental control. In spite of that, one cannot forget about some existing institutes in the national law, reason why they cannot be dematerialized. For the purpose, introduces the definitions and more important concepts for the main theme followed about constitutional control and constitutional mutation, followed by the performance of each power in constitutional control and the exposed of all criticism that reduces the importance of this meaning. By the consequence of this, the article pretends a harmonic understanding of the mutation and the current constitutional control system by an appreciation of precedent as an evolutional jurisprudential tool.
id IDDC_e716773df8afe4c992511f498aaad824
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.revistadoidcc.com.br:article/68
network_acronym_str IDDC
network_name_str Revista do Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Abtractization of incidental constitutional control, the effectiveness of decisions and the constitutional mutation of article 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution: a response for criticismAbstrativização do controle incidental, a eficácia das decisões e a mutação constitucional do art. 52, X da CF: uma resposta às críticasControle de constitucionalidadeabstrativização do controle incidentalart. 52, X da CFConstitutional controlabstractization of incidental constitutional controlart. 52, X of Brazil’s ConstitutionThe work finds an answer for the criticism about the constitutional mutation of article 52, X in Brazil’s Constitution position thought by part of the doctrine and endorsed by the Supreme Court in your current composition. The comprehension proposes made a system from the decisions of the Court to be respected from objective or incidental control. In spite of that, one cannot forget about some existing institutes in the national law, reason why they cannot be dematerialized. For the purpose, introduces the definitions and more important concepts for the main theme followed about constitutional control and constitutional mutation, followed by the performance of each power in constitutional control and the exposed of all criticism that reduces the importance of this meaning. By the consequence of this, the article pretends a harmonic understanding of the mutation and the current constitutional control system by an appreciation of precedent as an evolutional jurisprudential tool. O trabalho procura responder às críticas sobre a mutação constitucional do artigo 52, X da CF, compreensão que fora pensada por parte da doutrina e encampada pelo STF em sua composição atual. A interpretação do inciso propõe a sistematização das decisões do tribunal e seu consequente respeito independentemente de o processo ser objetivo ou incidental. Apesar disso, não se pode esquecer acerca de alguns institutos existentes no direito pátrio, motivo pelo qual não podem ser desmaterializados. Para tanto, introduzimos o assunto com os conceitos mais importantes para a compreensão do tema de controle de constitucionalidade e a mutação constitucional, seguida do papel dos poderes nesse controle e a exposição de todas críticas relevantes que infirmam a referida posição. Como consequência do objetivo, o artigo propõe uma tentativa de harmonização dessa mutação com o sistema de controle de constitucionalidade existente, bem como a própria constituição, com a valorização do precedente como ferramenta para evolução jurisprudencial.  Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania2020-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionOriginal articleArtículo originalArtigo originalapplication/pdfhttps://revistadoidcc.com.br/index.php/revista/article/view/6810.48159/revistadoidcc.v5n1.valerio.benfattiRevista do Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania; v. 5 n. 1 (2020): Revista do Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania; 111-1272596-00751808-9143reponame:Revista do Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (Online)instname:Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (IDCC)instacron:IDDCporhttps://revistadoidcc.com.br/index.php/revista/article/view/68/67Copyright (c) 2020 Guilherme Lucas Valério, Fábio Fernandes Neves Benfattihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessValério, Guilherme Lucas Benfatti, Fábio Fernandes Neves 2020-09-01T11:04:55Zoai:ojs2.revistadoidcc.com.br:article/68Revistahttp://revistadoidcc.com.br/ONGhttps://revistadoidcc.com.br/index.php/revista/oaiidcc.revista@gmail.com2596-00751808-9143opendoar:2020-09-01T11:04:55Revista do Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (Online) - Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (IDCC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Abtractization of incidental constitutional control, the effectiveness of decisions and the constitutional mutation of article 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution: a response for criticism
Abstrativização do controle incidental, a eficácia das decisões e a mutação constitucional do art. 52, X da CF: uma resposta às críticas
title Abtractization of incidental constitutional control, the effectiveness of decisions and the constitutional mutation of article 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution: a response for criticism
spellingShingle Abtractization of incidental constitutional control, the effectiveness of decisions and the constitutional mutation of article 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution: a response for criticism
Valério, Guilherme Lucas
Controle de constitucionalidade
abstrativização do controle incidental
art. 52, X da CF
Constitutional control
abstractization of incidental constitutional control
art. 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution
title_short Abtractization of incidental constitutional control, the effectiveness of decisions and the constitutional mutation of article 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution: a response for criticism
title_full Abtractization of incidental constitutional control, the effectiveness of decisions and the constitutional mutation of article 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution: a response for criticism
title_fullStr Abtractization of incidental constitutional control, the effectiveness of decisions and the constitutional mutation of article 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution: a response for criticism
title_full_unstemmed Abtractization of incidental constitutional control, the effectiveness of decisions and the constitutional mutation of article 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution: a response for criticism
title_sort Abtractization of incidental constitutional control, the effectiveness of decisions and the constitutional mutation of article 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution: a response for criticism
author Valério, Guilherme Lucas
author_facet Valério, Guilherme Lucas
Benfatti, Fábio Fernandes Neves
author_role author
author2 Benfatti, Fábio Fernandes Neves
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Valério, Guilherme Lucas
Benfatti, Fábio Fernandes Neves
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Controle de constitucionalidade
abstrativização do controle incidental
art. 52, X da CF
Constitutional control
abstractization of incidental constitutional control
art. 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution
topic Controle de constitucionalidade
abstrativização do controle incidental
art. 52, X da CF
Constitutional control
abstractization of incidental constitutional control
art. 52, X of Brazil’s Constitution
description The work finds an answer for the criticism about the constitutional mutation of article 52, X in Brazil’s Constitution position thought by part of the doctrine and endorsed by the Supreme Court in your current composition. The comprehension proposes made a system from the decisions of the Court to be respected from objective or incidental control. In spite of that, one cannot forget about some existing institutes in the national law, reason why they cannot be dematerialized. For the purpose, introduces the definitions and more important concepts for the main theme followed about constitutional control and constitutional mutation, followed by the performance of each power in constitutional control and the exposed of all criticism that reduces the importance of this meaning. By the consequence of this, the article pretends a harmonic understanding of the mutation and the current constitutional control system by an appreciation of precedent as an evolutional jurisprudential tool.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Original article
Artículo original
Artigo original
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistadoidcc.com.br/index.php/revista/article/view/68
10.48159/revistadoidcc.v5n1.valerio.benfatti
url https://revistadoidcc.com.br/index.php/revista/article/view/68
identifier_str_mv 10.48159/revistadoidcc.v5n1.valerio.benfatti
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistadoidcc.com.br/index.php/revista/article/view/68/67
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Guilherme Lucas Valério, Fábio Fernandes Neves Benfatti
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Guilherme Lucas Valério, Fábio Fernandes Neves Benfatti
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania; v. 5 n. 1 (2020): Revista do Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania; 111-127
2596-0075
1808-9143
reponame:Revista do Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (Online)
instname:Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (IDCC)
instacron:IDDC
instname_str Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (IDCC)
instacron_str IDDC
institution IDDC
reponame_str Revista do Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (Online)
collection Revista do Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (Online) - Instituto de Direito Constitucional e Cidadania (IDCC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv idcc.revista@gmail.com
_version_ 1837009990975488000