The Theoretical course of the Good Faith Principle of Jurisprudence and its Reception in Civil Law Brazilian
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Publication Date: | 2016 |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | por |
| Source: | Conpedi Law Review |
| Download full: | https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3491 |
Summary: | The scope of this article is to demonstrate how the good-faith principle moved away from the formalism into which is was embedded under the aegis of legal positivism of the 19th century, to become the object of jurisprudential creation without, however, totally departing from a certain positivistic rationality. Restricted to the parameters of forma- lism, it has shown to be too imprecise to be included in a syllogistic way of thinking, which demanded juridical methodology efforts in face of the legislative technique of ge- neral clauses, standards and juridical principles in order to delimit its area of application. Here is what German courts in the post-war second period achieved; the concretization of the general clause of good-faith into typical legal concepts, the exercise of which re- mains inadmissible: exceptio doli generalis, venire contra facum proprium, Verwirkung, tu quoque, non allegeability of formal nullity, and the unbalanced exercise of rights. We have limited the topic of this article to the function of good-faith control in the exercise of individual prerogatives in the area of economics, and found that the concept is included in other legal systems that lacked it. Having chosen to investigate the concept of good- faith in Brazilian jurisprudence, we have submitted the results to critical examination, revealing the specificity of the European juridical tradition in our own Law. Lastly, we question the limits of a “prêt-a-porter” good-faith to maintain juridical positivism. |
| id |
CONPEDI-4_ec15075a45cadb09c8a91ee830754c8b |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3491 |
| network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-4 |
| network_name_str |
Conpedi Law Review |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
The Theoretical course of the Good Faith Principle of Jurisprudence and its Reception in Civil Law BrazilianO Percurso Teórico do Princípio da Boa-Fé e sua Recepção Jurisprudencial no Direito Civil BrasileiroGood-faith principleJuridical positivismGeneral clauseJurisprudence.Princípio da boa-féPositivismo jurídicoCláusula geralJurisprudência.The scope of this article is to demonstrate how the good-faith principle moved away from the formalism into which is was embedded under the aegis of legal positivism of the 19th century, to become the object of jurisprudential creation without, however, totally departing from a certain positivistic rationality. Restricted to the parameters of forma- lism, it has shown to be too imprecise to be included in a syllogistic way of thinking, which demanded juridical methodology efforts in face of the legislative technique of ge- neral clauses, standards and juridical principles in order to delimit its area of application. Here is what German courts in the post-war second period achieved; the concretization of the general clause of good-faith into typical legal concepts, the exercise of which re- mains inadmissible: exceptio doli generalis, venire contra facum proprium, Verwirkung, tu quoque, non allegeability of formal nullity, and the unbalanced exercise of rights. We have limited the topic of this article to the function of good-faith control in the exercise of individual prerogatives in the area of economics, and found that the concept is included in other legal systems that lacked it. Having chosen to investigate the concept of good- faith in Brazilian jurisprudence, we have submitted the results to critical examination, revealing the specificity of the European juridical tradition in our own Law. Lastly, we question the limits of a “prêt-a-porter” good-faith to maintain juridical positivism.O presente trabalho tem por escopo demonstrar como o princípio da boa-fé é subtraído do formalismo no qual esteve mergulhado sob a égide do positivismo jurídico do século XIX, e torna-se objeto de criação jurisprudencial, mas sem se libertar completamente dos laços de uma racionalidade positivista. Restrito aos parâmetros do formalismo, mostrou-se impreciso demais para ser aplicado pelo modo de pensar silogístico, o que demandou esforços da metodologia jurídica diante da técnica legislativa das cláusulas gerais, standards e princípios jurídicos, com vistas a delimitar seu domínio de aplicação. Eis o que foi alcançado pelas cortes germânicas do Segundo Pós-guerra; a concretização da cláusula geral da boa-fé em figuras típicas, que restam inadmissíveis em seu exercício: exceptio doli generalis, venire contra factum proprium, Verwirkung, tu quoque, inalegabilidade de nulidades formais e o exercício desequilibrado de direitos. Delimitado o tema do presente trabalho à função de controle da boa-fé no exercício de prerrogativas individuais, seu percurso encontrou tradução em outros sistemas jurídicos, nos quais ainda predominava o vazio de seu conteúdo. Elegendo-se como espaço de tradução da boa-fé a jurisprudência brasileira, submetem-se seus resultados a uma leitura crítica, revelando a especificidade da tradição jurídico-europeia no direito pátrio. Por fim, indagam-se os limites de uma boa-fé “prêt-à-porter”, para a manutenção do positivismo jurídico.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI2016-06-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/349110.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i12.3491Conpedi Law Review; v. 1 n. 12 (2015): Direito Tributário, Direito Administrativo, Direito Ambiental e Sustentabilidade; 153-1812448-39312448-3931reponame:Conpedi Law Reviewinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3491/3004Copyright (c) 2016 Rosalice Fidalgo Pinheiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinheiro, Rosalice Fidalgo2021-08-20T02:09:39Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3491Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireviewONGhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2448-39312448-3931opendoar:2021-08-20T02:09:39Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Theoretical course of the Good Faith Principle of Jurisprudence and its Reception in Civil Law Brazilian O Percurso Teórico do Princípio da Boa-Fé e sua Recepção Jurisprudencial no Direito Civil Brasileiro |
| title |
The Theoretical course of the Good Faith Principle of Jurisprudence and its Reception in Civil Law Brazilian |
| spellingShingle |
The Theoretical course of the Good Faith Principle of Jurisprudence and its Reception in Civil Law Brazilian Pinheiro, Rosalice Fidalgo Good-faith principle Juridical positivism General clause Jurisprudence. Princípio da boa-fé Positivismo jurídico Cláusula geral Jurisprudência. |
| title_short |
The Theoretical course of the Good Faith Principle of Jurisprudence and its Reception in Civil Law Brazilian |
| title_full |
The Theoretical course of the Good Faith Principle of Jurisprudence and its Reception in Civil Law Brazilian |
| title_fullStr |
The Theoretical course of the Good Faith Principle of Jurisprudence and its Reception in Civil Law Brazilian |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The Theoretical course of the Good Faith Principle of Jurisprudence and its Reception in Civil Law Brazilian |
| title_sort |
The Theoretical course of the Good Faith Principle of Jurisprudence and its Reception in Civil Law Brazilian |
| author |
Pinheiro, Rosalice Fidalgo |
| author_facet |
Pinheiro, Rosalice Fidalgo |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pinheiro, Rosalice Fidalgo |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Good-faith principle Juridical positivism General clause Jurisprudence. Princípio da boa-fé Positivismo jurídico Cláusula geral Jurisprudência. |
| topic |
Good-faith principle Juridical positivism General clause Jurisprudence. Princípio da boa-fé Positivismo jurídico Cláusula geral Jurisprudência. |
| description |
The scope of this article is to demonstrate how the good-faith principle moved away from the formalism into which is was embedded under the aegis of legal positivism of the 19th century, to become the object of jurisprudential creation without, however, totally departing from a certain positivistic rationality. Restricted to the parameters of forma- lism, it has shown to be too imprecise to be included in a syllogistic way of thinking, which demanded juridical methodology efforts in face of the legislative technique of ge- neral clauses, standards and juridical principles in order to delimit its area of application. Here is what German courts in the post-war second period achieved; the concretization of the general clause of good-faith into typical legal concepts, the exercise of which re- mains inadmissible: exceptio doli generalis, venire contra facum proprium, Verwirkung, tu quoque, non allegeability of formal nullity, and the unbalanced exercise of rights. We have limited the topic of this article to the function of good-faith control in the exercise of individual prerogatives in the area of economics, and found that the concept is included in other legal systems that lacked it. Having chosen to investigate the concept of good- faith in Brazilian jurisprudence, we have submitted the results to critical examination, revealing the specificity of the European juridical tradition in our own Law. Lastly, we question the limits of a “prêt-a-porter” good-faith to maintain juridical positivism. |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-06 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3491 10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i12.3491 |
| url |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3491 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i12.3491 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3491/3004 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Rosalice Fidalgo Pinheiro info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Rosalice Fidalgo Pinheiro |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Conpedi Law Review; v. 1 n. 12 (2015): Direito Tributário, Direito Administrativo, Direito Ambiental e Sustentabilidade; 153-181 2448-3931 2448-3931 reponame:Conpedi Law Review instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
| instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
| instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
| institution |
CONPEDI |
| reponame_str |
Conpedi Law Review |
| collection |
Conpedi Law Review |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com |
| _version_ |
1830297900080431104 |