Export Ready — 

The Theoretical course of the Good Faith Principle of Jurisprudence and its Reception in Civil Law Brazilian

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pinheiro, Rosalice Fidalgo
Publication Date: 2016
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Conpedi Law Review
Download full: https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3491
Summary: The scope of this article is to demonstrate how the good-faith principle moved away from the formalism into which is was embedded under the aegis of legal positivism of the 19th century, to become the object of jurisprudential creation without, however, totally departing from a certain positivistic rationality.  Restricted to the parameters of forma- lism, it has shown to be too imprecise to be included in a syllogistic way of thinking, which demanded juridical methodology efforts in face of the legislative technique of ge- neral clauses, standards and juridical principles in order to delimit its area of application.  Here is what German courts in the post-war second period achieved; the concretization of the general clause of good-faith into typical legal concepts, the exercise of which re- mains inadmissible: exceptio doli generalis, venire contra facum proprium, Verwirkung, tu quoque, non allegeability of formal nullity, and the unbalanced exercise of rights.  We have limited the topic of this article to the function of good-faith control in the exercise of individual prerogatives in the area of economics, and found that the concept is included in other legal systems that lacked it.  Having chosen to investigate the concept of good- faith in Brazilian jurisprudence, we have submitted the results to critical examination, revealing the specificity of the European juridical tradition in our own Law.  Lastly, we question the limits of a “prêt-a-porter” good-faith to maintain juridical positivism.
id CONPEDI-4_ec15075a45cadb09c8a91ee830754c8b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3491
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-4
network_name_str Conpedi Law Review
repository_id_str
spelling The Theoretical course of the Good Faith Principle of Jurisprudence and its Reception in Civil Law BrazilianO Percurso Teórico do Princípio da Boa-Fé e sua Recepção Jurisprudencial no Direito Civil BrasileiroGood-faith principleJuridical positivismGeneral clauseJurisprudence.Princípio da boa-féPositivismo jurídicoCláusula geralJurisprudência.The scope of this article is to demonstrate how the good-faith principle moved away from the formalism into which is was embedded under the aegis of legal positivism of the 19th century, to become the object of jurisprudential creation without, however, totally departing from a certain positivistic rationality.  Restricted to the parameters of forma- lism, it has shown to be too imprecise to be included in a syllogistic way of thinking, which demanded juridical methodology efforts in face of the legislative technique of ge- neral clauses, standards and juridical principles in order to delimit its area of application.  Here is what German courts in the post-war second period achieved; the concretization of the general clause of good-faith into typical legal concepts, the exercise of which re- mains inadmissible: exceptio doli generalis, venire contra facum proprium, Verwirkung, tu quoque, non allegeability of formal nullity, and the unbalanced exercise of rights.  We have limited the topic of this article to the function of good-faith control in the exercise of individual prerogatives in the area of economics, and found that the concept is included in other legal systems that lacked it.  Having chosen to investigate the concept of good- faith in Brazilian jurisprudence, we have submitted the results to critical examination, revealing the specificity of the European juridical tradition in our own Law.  Lastly, we question the limits of a “prêt-a-porter” good-faith to maintain juridical positivism.O presente trabalho tem por escopo demonstrar como o princípio da boa-fé é subtraído do formalismo no qual esteve mergulhado sob a égide do positivismo jurídico do século XIX, e torna-se objeto de criação jurisprudencial, mas sem se libertar completamente dos laços de uma racionalidade positivista. Restrito aos parâmetros do formalismo, mostrou-se impreciso demais para ser aplicado pelo modo de pensar silogístico, o que demandou esforços da metodologia jurídica diante da técnica legislativa das cláusulas gerais, standards e princípios jurídicos, com vistas a delimitar seu domínio de aplicação. Eis o que foi alcançado pelas cortes germânicas do Segundo Pós-guerra; a concretização da cláusula geral da boa-fé em figuras típicas, que restam inadmissíveis em seu exercício: exceptio doli generalis, venire contra factum proprium, Verwirkung, tu quoque, inalegabilidade de nulidades formais e o exercício desequilibrado de direitos. Delimitado o tema do presente trabalho à função de controle da boa-fé no exercício de prerrogativas individuais, seu percurso encontrou tradução em outros sistemas jurídicos, nos quais ainda predominava o vazio de seu conteúdo. Elegendo-se como espaço de tradução da boa-fé a jurisprudência brasileira, submetem-se seus resultados a uma leitura crítica, revelando a especificidade da tradição jurídico-europeia no direito pátrio. Por fim, indagam-se os limites de uma boa-fé “prêt-à-porter”, para a manutenção do positivismo jurídico.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI2016-06-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/349110.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i12.3491Conpedi Law Review; v. 1 n. 12 (2015): Direito Tributário, Direito Administrativo, Direito Ambiental e Sustentabilidade; 153-1812448-39312448-3931reponame:Conpedi Law Reviewinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3491/3004Copyright (c) 2016 Rosalice Fidalgo Pinheiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinheiro, Rosalice Fidalgo2021-08-20T02:09:39Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3491Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireviewONGhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2448-39312448-3931opendoar:2021-08-20T02:09:39Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Theoretical course of the Good Faith Principle of Jurisprudence and its Reception in Civil Law Brazilian
O Percurso Teórico do Princípio da Boa-Fé e sua Recepção Jurisprudencial no Direito Civil Brasileiro
title The Theoretical course of the Good Faith Principle of Jurisprudence and its Reception in Civil Law Brazilian
spellingShingle The Theoretical course of the Good Faith Principle of Jurisprudence and its Reception in Civil Law Brazilian
Pinheiro, Rosalice Fidalgo
Good-faith principle
Juridical positivism
General clause
Jurisprudence.
Princípio da boa-fé
Positivismo jurídico
Cláusula geral
Jurisprudência.
title_short The Theoretical course of the Good Faith Principle of Jurisprudence and its Reception in Civil Law Brazilian
title_full The Theoretical course of the Good Faith Principle of Jurisprudence and its Reception in Civil Law Brazilian
title_fullStr The Theoretical course of the Good Faith Principle of Jurisprudence and its Reception in Civil Law Brazilian
title_full_unstemmed The Theoretical course of the Good Faith Principle of Jurisprudence and its Reception in Civil Law Brazilian
title_sort The Theoretical course of the Good Faith Principle of Jurisprudence and its Reception in Civil Law Brazilian
author Pinheiro, Rosalice Fidalgo
author_facet Pinheiro, Rosalice Fidalgo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinheiro, Rosalice Fidalgo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Good-faith principle
Juridical positivism
General clause
Jurisprudence.
Princípio da boa-fé
Positivismo jurídico
Cláusula geral
Jurisprudência.
topic Good-faith principle
Juridical positivism
General clause
Jurisprudence.
Princípio da boa-fé
Positivismo jurídico
Cláusula geral
Jurisprudência.
description The scope of this article is to demonstrate how the good-faith principle moved away from the formalism into which is was embedded under the aegis of legal positivism of the 19th century, to become the object of jurisprudential creation without, however, totally departing from a certain positivistic rationality.  Restricted to the parameters of forma- lism, it has shown to be too imprecise to be included in a syllogistic way of thinking, which demanded juridical methodology efforts in face of the legislative technique of ge- neral clauses, standards and juridical principles in order to delimit its area of application.  Here is what German courts in the post-war second period achieved; the concretization of the general clause of good-faith into typical legal concepts, the exercise of which re- mains inadmissible: exceptio doli generalis, venire contra facum proprium, Verwirkung, tu quoque, non allegeability of formal nullity, and the unbalanced exercise of rights.  We have limited the topic of this article to the function of good-faith control in the exercise of individual prerogatives in the area of economics, and found that the concept is included in other legal systems that lacked it.  Having chosen to investigate the concept of good- faith in Brazilian jurisprudence, we have submitted the results to critical examination, revealing the specificity of the European juridical tradition in our own Law.  Lastly, we question the limits of a “prêt-a-porter” good-faith to maintain juridical positivism.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3491
10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i12.3491
url https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3491
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i12.3491
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3491/3004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Rosalice Fidalgo Pinheiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Rosalice Fidalgo Pinheiro
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Conpedi Law Review; v. 1 n. 12 (2015): Direito Tributário, Direito Administrativo, Direito Ambiental e Sustentabilidade; 153-181
2448-3931
2448-3931
reponame:Conpedi Law Review
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Conpedi Law Review
collection Conpedi Law Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com
_version_ 1830297900080431104