Alcohol (70%) versus alcoholic chlorhexidine solution (0.5%) in skin antisepsis for neuraxial blocks: a randomized clinical trial

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: TOSTES,LUIZ CARLOS SOUZA
Publication Date: 2021
Other Authors: LOYOLA,ANA BEATRIZ ALKMIM TEIXEIRA, FRAGA,ADILSON DE OLIVEIRA, GAZZI,LETÍCIA AZEVEDO, PAIVA,LUIZ FRANCISLEY DE, JULIANO,YARA, VEIGA,DANIELA FRANCESCATO
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912021000100200
Summary: ABSTRACT Objective: to compare the use of 0.5% alcoholic chlorhexidine and 70% alcohol in skin antisepsis for neuraxial blocks. Method: this is a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial, with two parallel arms. Seventy patients who were candidates for neuraxial block were randomly allocated to group A (n = 35), in whom antisepsis was performed with 0.5% alcoholic chlorhexidine, or to group B (n = 35), in whom we used 70% hydrated ethyl alcohol. Swabs were harvested for culture at three times: before antisepsis, two minutes after application of the antiseptic, and immediately after puncture. The samples were sown in three culture media and the number of colony forming units (CFU) per cm² was counted. Results: there was no difference between the groups regarding age, sex, body mass index, time to perform the block or type of block. There were no differences between groups in the CFU/cm² counts before antisepsis. There was less bacterial growth in group B two minutes after application of the antiseptic (p = 0.048), but there was no difference between the groups regarding the number of CFU/cm² at the end of the puncture. Conclusion: 70% alcohol was more effective in reducing the number of CFU/cm² after two minutes, and there was no difference between the two groups regarding skin colonization at the end of the procedure. These results suggest that 70% alcohol may be an option for skin antisepsis before neuraxial blocks. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02833376.
id CBC-1_8371fb77893db93aecbe44c8d04597b5
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-69912021000100200
network_acronym_str CBC-1
network_name_str Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
repository_id_str
spelling Alcohol (70%) versus alcoholic chlorhexidine solution (0.5%) in skin antisepsis for neuraxial blocks: a randomized clinical trialAntisepsisChlorhexidineEthanolAnesthesia SpinalAnestesia EpiduralABSTRACT Objective: to compare the use of 0.5% alcoholic chlorhexidine and 70% alcohol in skin antisepsis for neuraxial blocks. Method: this is a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial, with two parallel arms. Seventy patients who were candidates for neuraxial block were randomly allocated to group A (n = 35), in whom antisepsis was performed with 0.5% alcoholic chlorhexidine, or to group B (n = 35), in whom we used 70% hydrated ethyl alcohol. Swabs were harvested for culture at three times: before antisepsis, two minutes after application of the antiseptic, and immediately after puncture. The samples were sown in three culture media and the number of colony forming units (CFU) per cm² was counted. Results: there was no difference between the groups regarding age, sex, body mass index, time to perform the block or type of block. There were no differences between groups in the CFU/cm² counts before antisepsis. There was less bacterial growth in group B two minutes after application of the antiseptic (p = 0.048), but there was no difference between the groups regarding the number of CFU/cm² at the end of the puncture. Conclusion: 70% alcohol was more effective in reducing the number of CFU/cm² after two minutes, and there was no difference between the two groups regarding skin colonization at the end of the procedure. These results suggest that 70% alcohol may be an option for skin antisepsis before neuraxial blocks. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02833376.Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912021000100200Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.48 2021reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiõesinstname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)instacron:CBC10.1590/0100-6991e-20202633info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTOSTES,LUIZ CARLOS SOUZALOYOLA,ANA BEATRIZ ALKMIM TEIXEIRAFRAGA,ADILSON DE OLIVEIRAGAZZI,LETÍCIA AZEVEDOPAIVA,LUIZ FRANCISLEY DEJULIANO,YARAVEIGA,DANIELA FRANCESCATOeng2021-01-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69912021000100200Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rcbcONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacbc@cbc.org.br1809-45460100-6991opendoar:2021-01-08T00:00Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Alcohol (70%) versus alcoholic chlorhexidine solution (0.5%) in skin antisepsis for neuraxial blocks: a randomized clinical trial
title Alcohol (70%) versus alcoholic chlorhexidine solution (0.5%) in skin antisepsis for neuraxial blocks: a randomized clinical trial
spellingShingle Alcohol (70%) versus alcoholic chlorhexidine solution (0.5%) in skin antisepsis for neuraxial blocks: a randomized clinical trial
TOSTES,LUIZ CARLOS SOUZA
Antisepsis
Chlorhexidine
Ethanol
Anesthesia Spinal
Anestesia Epidural
title_short Alcohol (70%) versus alcoholic chlorhexidine solution (0.5%) in skin antisepsis for neuraxial blocks: a randomized clinical trial
title_full Alcohol (70%) versus alcoholic chlorhexidine solution (0.5%) in skin antisepsis for neuraxial blocks: a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Alcohol (70%) versus alcoholic chlorhexidine solution (0.5%) in skin antisepsis for neuraxial blocks: a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Alcohol (70%) versus alcoholic chlorhexidine solution (0.5%) in skin antisepsis for neuraxial blocks: a randomized clinical trial
title_sort Alcohol (70%) versus alcoholic chlorhexidine solution (0.5%) in skin antisepsis for neuraxial blocks: a randomized clinical trial
author TOSTES,LUIZ CARLOS SOUZA
author_facet TOSTES,LUIZ CARLOS SOUZA
LOYOLA,ANA BEATRIZ ALKMIM TEIXEIRA
FRAGA,ADILSON DE OLIVEIRA
GAZZI,LETÍCIA AZEVEDO
PAIVA,LUIZ FRANCISLEY DE
JULIANO,YARA
VEIGA,DANIELA FRANCESCATO
author_role author
author2 LOYOLA,ANA BEATRIZ ALKMIM TEIXEIRA
FRAGA,ADILSON DE OLIVEIRA
GAZZI,LETÍCIA AZEVEDO
PAIVA,LUIZ FRANCISLEY DE
JULIANO,YARA
VEIGA,DANIELA FRANCESCATO
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv TOSTES,LUIZ CARLOS SOUZA
LOYOLA,ANA BEATRIZ ALKMIM TEIXEIRA
FRAGA,ADILSON DE OLIVEIRA
GAZZI,LETÍCIA AZEVEDO
PAIVA,LUIZ FRANCISLEY DE
JULIANO,YARA
VEIGA,DANIELA FRANCESCATO
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Antisepsis
Chlorhexidine
Ethanol
Anesthesia Spinal
Anestesia Epidural
topic Antisepsis
Chlorhexidine
Ethanol
Anesthesia Spinal
Anestesia Epidural
description ABSTRACT Objective: to compare the use of 0.5% alcoholic chlorhexidine and 70% alcohol in skin antisepsis for neuraxial blocks. Method: this is a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial, with two parallel arms. Seventy patients who were candidates for neuraxial block were randomly allocated to group A (n = 35), in whom antisepsis was performed with 0.5% alcoholic chlorhexidine, or to group B (n = 35), in whom we used 70% hydrated ethyl alcohol. Swabs were harvested for culture at three times: before antisepsis, two minutes after application of the antiseptic, and immediately after puncture. The samples were sown in three culture media and the number of colony forming units (CFU) per cm² was counted. Results: there was no difference between the groups regarding age, sex, body mass index, time to perform the block or type of block. There were no differences between groups in the CFU/cm² counts before antisepsis. There was less bacterial growth in group B two minutes after application of the antiseptic (p = 0.048), but there was no difference between the groups regarding the number of CFU/cm² at the end of the puncture. Conclusion: 70% alcohol was more effective in reducing the number of CFU/cm² after two minutes, and there was no difference between the two groups regarding skin colonization at the end of the procedure. These results suggest that 70% alcohol may be an option for skin antisepsis before neuraxial blocks. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02833376.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912021000100200
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912021000100200
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-6991e-20202633
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.48 2021
reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)
instacron:CBC
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)
instacron_str CBC
institution CBC
reponame_str Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
collection Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacbc@cbc.org.br
_version_ 1754209215049629696