Neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for urological surgery: systematic review
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2013 |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | São Paulo medical journal (Online) |
Download full: | https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1299 |
Summary: | CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Choosing the best anesthetic technique for urological surgery with the aim of mortality reduction remains controversial. The objective here was to compare the effectiveness and safety of neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for urological surgery. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review, Universidade Federal de Alagoas. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2012), Medline via PubMed (1966 to October 2012), Lilacs (1982 to October 2012), SciELO and EMBASE (1974 to October 2012). The reference lists of the studies included and of one systematic review in the same field were also analyzed. The studies included were randomized controlled trials (RCT) that analyzed neuraxial anesthesia and general anesthesia for urological surgery. RESULTS: The titles and abstracts of 2720 articles were analyzed. Among these, 16 studies were identified and 11 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. One RCT was published twice. The study validity was: Jadad score > 3 in one RCT; seven RCTs with unclear risk of bias as the most common response; and five RCTs not fulfilling half of the Delphi list items. The frequency of mortality was not significant between study groups in three RCTs. Meta-analysis was not performed. CONCLUSION: At the moment, the evidence available cannot prove that neuraxial anesthesia is more effective and safer than general anesthesia for urological surgery. There were insufficient data to pool the results relating to mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, length of hospitalization, quality of life, degree of satisfaction, postoperative cognitive dysfunction and blood transfusion requirements. |
id |
APM-1_faa9cf0f765a56a39d7e1a0a6bbef6c0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.diagnosticoetratamento.emnuvens.com.br:article/1299 |
network_acronym_str |
APM-1 |
network_name_str |
São Paulo medical journal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for urological surgery: systematic reviewAnestesia neuroaxial versus anestesia geral para cirurgias urológicas: revisão sistemáticaMortalidadeAnestesia geralAnestesia epiduralRaquianestesiaRevisãoMortalityAnesthesia, generalAnesthesia, epiduralAnesthesia, spinalReview [publication type]CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Choosing the best anesthetic technique for urological surgery with the aim of mortality reduction remains controversial. The objective here was to compare the effectiveness and safety of neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for urological surgery. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review, Universidade Federal de Alagoas. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2012), Medline via PubMed (1966 to October 2012), Lilacs (1982 to October 2012), SciELO and EMBASE (1974 to October 2012). The reference lists of the studies included and of one systematic review in the same field were also analyzed. The studies included were randomized controlled trials (RCT) that analyzed neuraxial anesthesia and general anesthesia for urological surgery. RESULTS: The titles and abstracts of 2720 articles were analyzed. Among these, 16 studies were identified and 11 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. One RCT was published twice. The study validity was: Jadad score > 3 in one RCT; seven RCTs with unclear risk of bias as the most common response; and five RCTs not fulfilling half of the Delphi list items. The frequency of mortality was not significant between study groups in three RCTs. Meta-analysis was not performed. CONCLUSION: At the moment, the evidence available cannot prove that neuraxial anesthesia is more effective and safer than general anesthesia for urological surgery. There were insufficient data to pool the results relating to mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, length of hospitalization, quality of life, degree of satisfaction, postoperative cognitive dysfunction and blood transfusion requirements.CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: A escolha da melhor técnica anestésica para cirurgias urológicas para reduzir mortalidade permanece controversa. O objetivo foi comparar a efetividade e segurança da anestesia neuroaxial versus anestesia geral para cirurgias urológicas. TIPO DE ESTUDO E LOCAL: Revisão sistemática, Universidade Federal de Alagoas. MÉTODO: Fizemos a busca em Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials na Cochrane Library (2012, volume 10), Medline via PubMed (1966 até outubro de 2012), Lilacs (1982 até outubro de 2012), SciELO e EMBASE (1974 até outubro de 2012). As listas de referências dos estudos incluídos e de uma revisão sistemática em urologia também foram analisadas. Os estudos incluídos foram ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECR) que analisaram as anestesias neuroaxial e geral para cirurgias urológicas. RESULTADOS: Os títulos e resumos de 2.720 artigos foram analisados. Entre eles, 16 estudos foram identificados e 11 preencheram os critérios de inclusão. Um ECR foi publicado duas vezes. A validade dos estudos foi: escore de Jadad > 3 em um ECR; sete ECRs com indeterminado risco de viés como a resposta mais comum; cinco ECR sem preenchimento da metade dos itens da lista de Delphi. A frequência de mortalidade não foi significante entre os grupos de estudo em três ECR. A metanálise não foi realizada. CONCLUSÃO: Até o momento, as evidências disponíveis não puderam provar que a anestesia neuroaxial seja mais efetiva e segura do que a anestesia geral para cirurgias urológicas. Não houve dados suficientes para reunir os resultados de mortalidade, infarto cerebral, infarto do miocárdio, duração de internação hospitalar, qualidade de vida, grau de satisfação, disfunção cognitiva pós-operatória e necessidade de transfusão sanguínea.São Paulo Medical JournalSão Paulo Medical Journal2013-05-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1299São Paulo Medical Journal; Vol. 131 No. 3 (2013); 179-186São Paulo Medical Journal; v. 131 n. 3 (2013); 179-1861806-9460reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APMenghttps://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1299/1217https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarbosa, Fabiano TimbóCastro, Aldemar Araújo2023-08-31T16:44:01Zoai:ojs.diagnosticoetratamento.emnuvens.com.br:article/1299Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2023-08-31T16:44:01São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for urological surgery: systematic review Anestesia neuroaxial versus anestesia geral para cirurgias urológicas: revisão sistemática |
title |
Neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for urological surgery: systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for urological surgery: systematic review Barbosa, Fabiano Timbó Mortalidade Anestesia geral Anestesia epidural Raquianestesia Revisão Mortality Anesthesia, general Anesthesia, epidural Anesthesia, spinal Review [publication type] |
title_short |
Neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for urological surgery: systematic review |
title_full |
Neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for urological surgery: systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for urological surgery: systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for urological surgery: systematic review |
title_sort |
Neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for urological surgery: systematic review |
author |
Barbosa, Fabiano Timbó |
author_facet |
Barbosa, Fabiano Timbó Castro, Aldemar Araújo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Castro, Aldemar Araújo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Barbosa, Fabiano Timbó Castro, Aldemar Araújo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Mortalidade Anestesia geral Anestesia epidural Raquianestesia Revisão Mortality Anesthesia, general Anesthesia, epidural Anesthesia, spinal Review [publication type] |
topic |
Mortalidade Anestesia geral Anestesia epidural Raquianestesia Revisão Mortality Anesthesia, general Anesthesia, epidural Anesthesia, spinal Review [publication type] |
description |
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Choosing the best anesthetic technique for urological surgery with the aim of mortality reduction remains controversial. The objective here was to compare the effectiveness and safety of neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for urological surgery. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review, Universidade Federal de Alagoas. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2012), Medline via PubMed (1966 to October 2012), Lilacs (1982 to October 2012), SciELO and EMBASE (1974 to October 2012). The reference lists of the studies included and of one systematic review in the same field were also analyzed. The studies included were randomized controlled trials (RCT) that analyzed neuraxial anesthesia and general anesthesia for urological surgery. RESULTS: The titles and abstracts of 2720 articles were analyzed. Among these, 16 studies were identified and 11 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. One RCT was published twice. The study validity was: Jadad score > 3 in one RCT; seven RCTs with unclear risk of bias as the most common response; and five RCTs not fulfilling half of the Delphi list items. The frequency of mortality was not significant between study groups in three RCTs. Meta-analysis was not performed. CONCLUSION: At the moment, the evidence available cannot prove that neuraxial anesthesia is more effective and safer than general anesthesia for urological surgery. There were insufficient data to pool the results relating to mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, length of hospitalization, quality of life, degree of satisfaction, postoperative cognitive dysfunction and blood transfusion requirements. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-05-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1299 |
url |
https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1299 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1299/1217 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
São Paulo Medical Journal São Paulo Medical Journal |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
São Paulo Medical Journal São Paulo Medical Journal |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
São Paulo Medical Journal; Vol. 131 No. 3 (2013); 179-186 São Paulo Medical Journal; v. 131 n. 3 (2013); 179-186 1806-9460 reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online) instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina instacron:APM |
instname_str |
Associação Paulista de Medicina |
instacron_str |
APM |
institution |
APM |
reponame_str |
São Paulo medical journal (Online) |
collection |
São Paulo medical journal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistas@apm.org.br |
_version_ |
1825135063180771328 |