Familiarity or conventionality? Investigating relevant factors in metaphor processing

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Gladiston Alves da
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Linguística
Texto Completo: https://cadernos.abralin.org/index.php/cadernos/article/view/466
Resumo: Are metaphors processed by the listener more slowly than literal expressions? To what extent can the speaker's familiarity with metaphorical expressions accelerate the process of understanding them? Studies on metaphor processing show divergences as to how this figure of speech is interpreted. Some authors argue that metaphors are processed more slowly than literal expressions, given the need to observe the three stages for understanding provided for in the Standard Pragmatic Model (SEARLE, 1979). Evidence of the indirect processing of metaphors, compatible with the aforementioned model, is reported in the literature (JANUS and BEVER, 1985). The priority of literal over metaphorical meaning has, however, been questioned by other studies that defend the direct processing of metaphorical expressions (GLUCKSBERG, 2003; RICCI, 2016). A third theoretical wave aims to reconcile the hitherto conflicting theories, proposing that, depending on the degree of conventionality of the metaphorical vehicle, a metaphor can be processed more slowly or at the same time as literal expressions (BOWDLE and GENTNER, 2005). In this framework, our study rescues the importance of familiarity already indicated as a relevant factor in a previous experimental study (SILVA, 2018). Here, we present new evidence, based on a psycholinguistic self-paced reading experiment, that the effective control of the metaphor's cognitive processing rests on the familiarity of the expression and not on the conventionality of the vehicle, as has been pointed out by most theorists.
id ABRALIN_59b18bf707fbf0c42b0eef5eb4e60a40
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs3.cadernos.abralin.org:article/466
network_acronym_str ABRALIN
network_name_str Cadernos de Linguística
repository_id_str
spelling Familiarity or conventionality? Investigating relevant factors in metaphor processingFamiliaridade ou convencionalidade? Investigando fatores relevantes no processamento de metáforasMetaphorsPsycholinguisticsProcessingFamiliarityConventionalityPsicolinguísticaProcessamentoMetáforaFamiliaridadeConvencionalidadeAre metaphors processed by the listener more slowly than literal expressions? To what extent can the speaker's familiarity with metaphorical expressions accelerate the process of understanding them? Studies on metaphor processing show divergences as to how this figure of speech is interpreted. Some authors argue that metaphors are processed more slowly than literal expressions, given the need to observe the three stages for understanding provided for in the Standard Pragmatic Model (SEARLE, 1979). Evidence of the indirect processing of metaphors, compatible with the aforementioned model, is reported in the literature (JANUS and BEVER, 1985). The priority of literal over metaphorical meaning has, however, been questioned by other studies that defend the direct processing of metaphorical expressions (GLUCKSBERG, 2003; RICCI, 2016). A third theoretical wave aims to reconcile the hitherto conflicting theories, proposing that, depending on the degree of conventionality of the metaphorical vehicle, a metaphor can be processed more slowly or at the same time as literal expressions (BOWDLE and GENTNER, 2005). In this framework, our study rescues the importance of familiarity already indicated as a relevant factor in a previous experimental study (SILVA, 2018). Here, we present new evidence, based on a psycholinguistic self-paced reading experiment, that the effective control of the metaphor's cognitive processing rests on the familiarity of the expression and not on the conventionality of the vehicle, as has been pointed out by most theorists.Metáforas são processadas pelo ouvinte mais lentamente que expressões literais? Em que medida a familiaridade do falante com as expressões metafóricas pode acelerar o processo de compreensão das mesmas? Estudos sobre o processamento da metáfora apresentam divergências quanto ao modo como essa figura de linguagem é interpretada. Alguns autores defendem que metáforas são processadas mais lentamente que expressões literais, tendo em vista a necessidade de observar os três estágios para a compreensão previstos no Modelo Pragmático Padrão (SEARLE, 1979). Evidências do processamento indireto das metáforas, compatíveis com o referido modelo, são reportadas na literatura (JANUS e BEVER, 1985). A prioridade do sentido literal sobre o metafórico tem sido, no entanto, questionado por outros estudos que defendem o processamento direto das expressões metafóricas (GLUCKSBERG, 2003; RICCI, 2016). Uma terceira onda teórica visa a conciliar as teorias, até então, conflitantes, propondo que, a depender do grau de convencionalidade do veículo metafórico, uma metáfora pode ser processada mais lentamente ou no mesmo tempo das expressões literais (BOWDLE e GENTNER, 2005). Nesse arcabouço, nosso estudo resgata a importância da familiaridade já indicada como um fator relevante em estudo experimental prévio (SILVA, 2018). Aqui, apresentamos novas evidências, com base em experimento psicolinguístico de leitura autocadenciada de que o controle efetivo do processamento cognitivo da metáfora recai sobre a familiaridade da expressão e não sobre a convencionalidade do veículo, como vem sendo apontado pela maioria dos teóricos.Abralin2021-09-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/xmlapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.abralin.org/index.php/cadernos/article/view/46610.25189/2675-4916.2021.v2.n4.id466Cadernos de Linguística; Vol. 2 No. 4 (2021); e466Cadernos de Linguística; Vol. 2 Núm. 4 (2021); e466Cadernos de Linguística; v. 2 n. 4 (2021); e4662675-4916reponame:Cadernos de Linguísticainstname:Associação Brasileira de Linguística (ABRALIN)instacron:ABRALINporhttps://cadernos.abralin.org/index.php/cadernos/article/view/466/513https://cadernos.abralin.org/index.php/cadernos/article/view/466/529Copyright (c) 2021 Gladiston Alves da Silvainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Gladiston Alves da2023-10-25T06:48:54Zoai:ojs3.cadernos.abralin.org:article/466Revistahttps://cadernos.abralin.org/ONGhttps://cadernos.abralin.org/index.php/cadernos/oaiabralin@abralin.org || cadlin@abralin.org13083-8592675-4916opendoar:2023-10-25T06:48:54Cadernos de Linguística - Associação Brasileira de Linguística (ABRALIN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Familiarity or conventionality? Investigating relevant factors in metaphor processing
Familiaridade ou convencionalidade? Investigando fatores relevantes no processamento de metáforas
title Familiarity or conventionality? Investigating relevant factors in metaphor processing
spellingShingle Familiarity or conventionality? Investigating relevant factors in metaphor processing
Silva, Gladiston Alves da
Metaphors
Psycholinguistics
Processing
Familiarity
Conventionality
Psicolinguística
Processamento
Metáfora
Familiaridade
Convencionalidade
title_short Familiarity or conventionality? Investigating relevant factors in metaphor processing
title_full Familiarity or conventionality? Investigating relevant factors in metaphor processing
title_fullStr Familiarity or conventionality? Investigating relevant factors in metaphor processing
title_full_unstemmed Familiarity or conventionality? Investigating relevant factors in metaphor processing
title_sort Familiarity or conventionality? Investigating relevant factors in metaphor processing
author Silva, Gladiston Alves da
author_facet Silva, Gladiston Alves da
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Gladiston Alves da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Metaphors
Psycholinguistics
Processing
Familiarity
Conventionality
Psicolinguística
Processamento
Metáfora
Familiaridade
Convencionalidade
topic Metaphors
Psycholinguistics
Processing
Familiarity
Conventionality
Psicolinguística
Processamento
Metáfora
Familiaridade
Convencionalidade
description Are metaphors processed by the listener more slowly than literal expressions? To what extent can the speaker's familiarity with metaphorical expressions accelerate the process of understanding them? Studies on metaphor processing show divergences as to how this figure of speech is interpreted. Some authors argue that metaphors are processed more slowly than literal expressions, given the need to observe the three stages for understanding provided for in the Standard Pragmatic Model (SEARLE, 1979). Evidence of the indirect processing of metaphors, compatible with the aforementioned model, is reported in the literature (JANUS and BEVER, 1985). The priority of literal over metaphorical meaning has, however, been questioned by other studies that defend the direct processing of metaphorical expressions (GLUCKSBERG, 2003; RICCI, 2016). A third theoretical wave aims to reconcile the hitherto conflicting theories, proposing that, depending on the degree of conventionality of the metaphorical vehicle, a metaphor can be processed more slowly or at the same time as literal expressions (BOWDLE and GENTNER, 2005). In this framework, our study rescues the importance of familiarity already indicated as a relevant factor in a previous experimental study (SILVA, 2018). Here, we present new evidence, based on a psycholinguistic self-paced reading experiment, that the effective control of the metaphor's cognitive processing rests on the familiarity of the expression and not on the conventionality of the vehicle, as has been pointed out by most theorists.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.abralin.org/index.php/cadernos/article/view/466
10.25189/2675-4916.2021.v2.n4.id466
url https://cadernos.abralin.org/index.php/cadernos/article/view/466
identifier_str_mv 10.25189/2675-4916.2021.v2.n4.id466
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.abralin.org/index.php/cadernos/article/view/466/513
https://cadernos.abralin.org/index.php/cadernos/article/view/466/529
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Gladiston Alves da Silva
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Gladiston Alves da Silva
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/xml
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Abralin
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Abralin
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Linguística; Vol. 2 No. 4 (2021); e466
Cadernos de Linguística; Vol. 2 Núm. 4 (2021); e466
Cadernos de Linguística; v. 2 n. 4 (2021); e466
2675-4916
reponame:Cadernos de Linguística
instname:Associação Brasileira de Linguística (ABRALIN)
instacron:ABRALIN
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Linguística (ABRALIN)
instacron_str ABRALIN
institution ABRALIN
reponame_str Cadernos de Linguística
collection Cadernos de Linguística
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Linguística - Associação Brasileira de Linguística (ABRALIN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv abralin@abralin.org || cadlin@abralin.org
_version_ 1836103765410709504