Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2015 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Chamon, Luiz Fernando de Oliveira |
Orientador(a): |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
eng |
Instituição de defesa: |
Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/3/3142/tde-14072016-143633/
|
Resumo: |
Adaptive filtering has grown to become a fundamental topic in signal processing, increasingly attracting attention from the community. Important factors in this popularization were their low computational complexity and model-free nature, adapting even to nonstationary characteristics of the systems and/or signals under study. Nevertheless, many adaptive algorithms introduce trade-offs, for instance, between convergence rate, nonstationary signals tracking, and steady-state error, which can hinder their use in practical applications. Furthermore, some adaptive filters can become unstable when word length is reduced and/or the input data are highly correlated. Recently, combination of adaptive filters was put forward as a solution for such issues. This approach consists in combining a pool of filters by means of a supervisor that attempts to make the overall system at least as good (usually in the mean-square sense) as the best filter in the set. Examples of these structures have been shown to successfully solve this problem, although well-known limitations remain to be addressed. Moreover, due to the relative novelty of this topic, developments in combination of adaptive filters are difficult to accommodate into a common theoretical framework. This work studies combination of adaptive filters and addresses the aforementioned issue by (i) classifying the existing combinations and proposing a taxonomy that exposes the similarities and differences in their forms; (ii) proposing new combinations; (iii) devising a general framework for studying combinations of adaptive filters and using such framework in performance analyses. |