Internet regulation and development: the battle over the network neutrality

• Ano de defesa: 2018
• Autor(a) principal: Melo, Lílian Manoela Monteiro Cintra de
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: eng
• Instituição de defesa: Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
• Palavras-chave em Português: Direito Comparado > Estados Unidos; Brasil; Economic power; Governança; ICT; Inequality; Innovation; Inovação; Internet (regulação); Internet access; Internet governance; Law and development; Liberdade de expressão; Network neutrality; Poder econômico; S&TS; Structure
• Link de acesso: https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2132/tde-13112020-005158/

We have arrived at crossroads in the debates about the future of the internet governance. It is high time to address the reasons why policy choices have not been sufficient to preserve the internet\'s promise to bring about development, democratic engagement, and social justice. The network neutrality is central to this debate since it intersects all internet layers and is related to most contemporary issues that will shape future of the internet. My assumption is that network neutrality\'s failures are not an unintended consequence of the regulatory system, but part of the problem. My core hypothesis is that network neutrality\'s limits mainly occur because of, first, its inability to secure all envisioned goals and, second, its decontextualized focus on innovation on the last mile of the internet distributional chain. The network neutrality debate has produced a wide variety of work embedded within economic and legal studies regarding what would be necessary to guarantee a free and innovative internet. Although this work has been often disguised under the mask of technique, it is widespread influenced by the evolutionary economics and denies the network neutrality\'s effects on ongoing struggles for social and economic justice. My proposition is that network neutrality debate has failed because it proved unable to address the problems related to concentrated power structures on the internet and increasing inequalities. To achieve this objective, this dissertation investigates the network neutrality debate over the last decades to identify processes and mechanisms by which its sterile arrangements came to take specific form in time and place, focusing on what such arrangements might inform about contemporary policy efforts. In Chapter 1, prevalent internet governance myths are deconstructed, presenting how specific architecture design and the corresponding network neutrality outcomes came to prevail in particular periods. Drawing upon and integration of distinct source materials, Chapters 2 and 3 identify the specific contingencies over the past decades by which a dynamic set of evolving actors, events, and institutions converged (or not) and gave rise to current network neutrality rules and dissent in the United States and Brazil. At the center of the analysis is the identification of structures and power struggles. Finally, Chapter 4 aims at presenting a new framework towards the network neutrality debate and its potential distributive effects in the global economy, taking technology not as deterministic but embedded and being embedded in all the building blocks of what we term the social.