Estudo retrospectivo do contorno gengival após a instalação de implante osseointegrado imediato nos incidentes de traumatismo dental através da gengimorfometria

• Ano de defesa: 2011
• Autor(a) principal: Rigolizzo, Maurício Bruhns
• Orientador(a): Francischone, Carlos Eduardo
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: IASCJ - Universidade Sagrado Coração
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Implantologia
• Departamento: Ciências da Saúde e Biológicas
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: IMPLANTE UNITÁRIO IMEDIATO; REPARAÇÃO ESPONTÂNEA; RAIZ FRATURADA; GENGIMORFOMETRIA; TRAUMA DENTAL
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: SINGLE-TOOTH IMPLANT RESTORATION; ROOT FRACTURES REPAIR; DENTAL TRAUMA; GINGIVOMORPHOMETRY
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ODONTOLOGIA
• Link de acesso: http://tede2.usc.br:8080/tede/handle/tede/64

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to discuss about the maintenance of teeth after trauma and the different factors that may influence on extraction indication. Whem the injured tooth was extracted and replaced by an immediate dental implant with immediate junction, gingimorphometry was used to evaluate gingival contour. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included by 16 patients-9 males and 7 females, with an average age of 57,5 years old (28-79 years old) submitted to upper central incisor extraction (10 right incisors and 6 left incisors) due to dental trauma episodes or dental overloading, causing irreparable injury to the dental structure. The follow-up averaged 46 months (82-17 months). CONCLUSION: Literature shows favorable prognosis with success rates above 80% when dental root maintains vitality after dental trauma. Success rates for immediate single tooth implant in this study were 100% for the osseointegration and prostheses. Evaluation of papillae heights directly on patients did not present statistically significant differences on frontal view comparing Control and Experimental Groups. When papillae height and área were evaluated through photographic images results did not present statistically significant differences on frontal view comparing Control and Experimental Groups. Papillae height and area were also evaluated on occlusal view through photographic images and results found statistically significant differences when comparing Control and Experimental Groups.