Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2010 |
Autor(a) principal: |
MEIRELLES, Fernanda Silva de
 |
Orientador(a): |
MENDES, Emiko Shinozaki |
Banca de defesa: |
GOES, Lílian Maria Nery de Barros,
CORREIA, Eudes de Souza |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Veterinária
|
Departamento: |
Departamento de Medicina Veterinária
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/5629
|
Resumo: |
In Brazil, it is considered that the annual production of tilapias overcomes 100 thousand tons, mainly due to the productive potential of the Northeast area that answered for 41% of the total production of 70.000 tons in 2004, generating income of US$ 200.000.000,00, due to your climatic conditions, technology readiness and consumption market, regional and national in expansion. The intensification of cultivations has as consequence the increase of organic matter, that it favors the multiplication of microorganisms, making possible him/it supplies of diseases in the occurrence of adverse situations to the fish. Tilapia (Oerochromis niloticus) of cultivations of the state of Pernambuco they were appraised with objective of determining the frequency of bacterial diseases. For so much, samples of several farms were analyzed, in the several aspects, with relevance for the bacterial agents. The tilapia were examined with relationship to the streptococcus presence, víbrios, coliform, pseudomonas and aeromonas. Clinical exams and autopsy were accomplished, for microscopic analysis of the lesions and better definition of the probable agent etiological. The analyses were accomplished at the Laboratory of Sanity of Aquatic Animals (LASAq) of the Rural Federal University of Pernambuco (UFRPE) and in the Center of Development and Diffusion of Technology in Aquaculture of the State University of Bahia (UNEB). The principal pathological agents were víbrios and aeromonas, that are pathogens responsible opportunists for significant losses, being identified the following species in 46 isolated: V. natriegens (1/46), V. metschnikovii (2/46), V. halioticoli (1/46), V. fischeri (2/46), V. mimicus (23/46), V. diabolicus (1/46), V. furnissi (1/46), V. cholerae o1 (1/46), V. scophthalmi (4/46), V. proteolyticus (3/46), V. argarivorans (1/46), V. ordalii (2/46) and Vibrio spp. ( 3/46). The isolated vibrios presented larger sensibility to the antimicrobianos enrofloxacina (100%) and florfenicol (98,18%) and in decreasing order, gentamicina (90,91%), cotrimoxazol (sulfametoxazol+trimetroprim) (76,36%), tetraciclin (67,27%), eritromicin (30,91%) and amoxilina (3,64%). The isolated ones tested they came 100% resistant the penicillin. In this study, 96,4% (53/55) of the víbrios they presented index multiple resistance to antibiotics (MAR), superior to 0,22, characterizing multiple resistance. In 35 isolated the identified aeromonas were: A.caviae (1/35), A. shubertii (11/35), A. media (4/35), A. popoffii (1/35), A. sobria (3/35), A. encheleia (4/35), A. veronii (4/35) e A. jandaei (4/35) Forty were tested isolated of aeromonas with relationship to the sensibility to 08 antimicrobial, of these they showed larger sensibility the florfenicol (100,0%), enrofloxacina(95,0%), gentamicina (95,0%) and in decreasing order, cotrimoxazol (sulfametoxazol+trimetroprima) (67,5%), tetraciclina (65,0%). There was smaller sensibility the eritromicina (20,0%), penicillin (5,0%) and the amoxilina (2,5%), confirming the resistance existence. The index of multiple resistance to antibiotics (MAR) for the isolated of aeromonas it varied in an interval from 0,12 to 0,62, of these 95% (38/40) they came superior to 0,22 characterizing multiple resistance. Most of the species of isolated víbrios is not considered pathogenic for the fish (environmental), but nevertheless they can represent risk for the health of the tilapia for subject of opportunism and of the consumer, mainly if consumed raw. The isolated and identified movable aeromonas in this study are commonly considered as environmental, however many of the analyzed fish presented compatible symptomatology with the illness caused by these agents opportunists. |