Eu vejo o futuro repetir o passado : a natureza da Política Nacional de Alfabetização (PNA/2019-2022) para as crianças da educação infantil brasileira

• Ano de defesa: 2023
• Autor(a) principal: Souza, Flávia Burdzinski de
• Orientador(a): Esquinsani, Rosimar Serena Siqueira
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade de Passo Fundo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação
• Departamento: Faculdade de Educação – FAED
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Educação e Estado; Educação básica; Educação infantil - Currículos; Professores - Formação
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
• Link de acesso: http://tede.upf.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/2516

From a critical dialectical epistemological standpoint, this doctoral thesis, situated in the field of educational policies for Early Childhood Education (BRAZIL, 2009a; ABRAMOVAY, 1984; 1985; BARBOSA, 2009; CAMPOS, 1979; 2001; 2010; KRAMER, 1982; 1984; 1985; 2003; 2006; 2007; ROSEMBERG, 1992; 2001; 2002; 2003), aimed to develop a theoretical critique of the nature of the National Literacy Policy (PNA/2019-2022) for Early Childhood Education, reaffirming the sociopolitical and pedagogical role of the first stage of Basic Education in guaranteeing children's rights. Guided by the research questions, the following problematic issues were outlined: What conception of Early Childhood Education and literacy do the legal norms, publications, and actions of the National Literacy Policy (2019-2022) reveal? What is the nature of the proposal for Early Childhood Education expressed in the National Literacy Policy? The hermeneutic method was employed in the research process, involving analytical and careful interpretation of the documents that established the National Literacy Policy in Brazil (FLICKINGER, 2010; DALBOSCO; SANTA; BARONI, 2018; MATOS DE SOUZA, 2022). The research is of a basic nature, adopting a qualitative approach (BAUER; GASKEL, 2000). It has exploratory objectives and employs bibliographic and documentary procedures (CELLARD, 2008; FÁVERO; CENTENARO, 2019). To comprehend the essence of the studied phenomenon, the data produced were discussed using Discursive Textual Analysis (MORAES; GALIAZZI, 2007). Given the complexity of the research topic, the theoretical framework drew from a pluralistic perspective, combining the epistemological viewpoints of i) historical-cultural (VYGOTSKY, 2005; 2007; 2018); ii) poststructuralist (BALL, 2005; 2020; DARDOT; LAVAL, 2016; 2019; 2021; DAHLBERG; MOSS; PENCE, 2019; PERONI, 2006; 2018; 2020); and iii) critical dialectical (FREIRE, 1981; 1989; 2011; 2013; 2014; 2021). The research findings concluded that current educational policies for Early Childhood Education in Brazil, such as the National Curriculum Guidelines for Early Childhood Education and its revision (DCNEI/BRAZIL, 2009), standardize discourses that aim to insert children into the participation of a freer, fairer, and more solidary society, constructing new forms of sociability committed to breaking relations of domination and oppression. This entails ensuring the comprehensive care and education of children, respecting their own ways of learning and developing during childhood through social interactions, dialogical relationships, and play. Based on this premise, writing is conceived as a language, as a social right, as a cultural asset of humanity for the expression of thoughts, ideas, feelings, and imagination. These conceptions are centered on a democratic perspective of work, which contrasts with the individualistic, authoritarian, and compensatory nature presented by the National Literacy Policy, which idealizes Early Childhood Education as a preparation for literacy, anticipating content from primary education, in a mechanical and technical way. Therefore, it is concluded that the PNA, as an educational policy of a far-right government, views literacy as the teaching of mechanical coding and decoding skills, rendering the child invisible as a subject of rights and a participant in the learning process, as it focuses on a model of the universal, standardized, and homogeneous child dictated by the principles of neoliberalism and neoconservatism.