Impacto das decisões judiciais no sistema carcerário: fixação do marco temporal para início da contagem do prazo para aquisição dos direitos da execução penal

• Ano de defesa: 2019
• Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Thatiane Nara de
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Uberlândia; Brasil; Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito
• Palavras-chave em Português: Execução penal; Data-base; Benefícios executórios; Garantismo; Trânsito em julgado; Excesso de execução; Direito; Pena (Direito penal); Ejecución penal; Fecha-base; Beneficios ejecutorios; Tránsito en juzgado; Exceso de ejecución; Criminal execution; Base date; Enforceable benefits; Guarantee; Final judgment; Over execution; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PENAL; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PROCESSUAL PENAL
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/24831; http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/ufu.di.2019.627

The present work intends to verify the relation between the determination of the date of the final res judicata and the excess of execution in the process of criminal execution. More precisely, it is intended to analyze the legal-constitutional conformity and the consequences in the process of implementing two divergent jurisprudential positions on how to set the base date for the beginning of the count of the deadline for acquisition the subjective public rights of the person arrested during the criminal execution, due to the lack of specific provision in the Criminal Enforcement Law. The study was conducted with a focus on people who are already in prison, either because of provisional arrest or due to early compliance with sentence following confirmation of the sentence by the Court of Justice. Considering that execution is unique, even though the person has been convicted of more than one offense, this study was carried out considering the incident of unification of sentences, when it is necessary to define the amount of total sentence to be as well as their compliance regime, and there is also a need to set the base date for the purposes of counting the term for the acquisition of criminal enforcement rights, such as regime progression, for example. The study was carried out analyzing the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the State of Minas Gerais and also of the Superior Court of Justice, at which time it was observed that the topic is not pacified. Note that there are judged that they set the base date as the day of finality of the last conviction and others that set the day of the last imprisonment. Following the study, it was verified that the decision that establishes the day of the final res judicata of the condemnatory sentence as the initial milestone for counting the term for the acquisition of criminal enforcement rights causes an excess of execution because it does not consider the prison time already fulfilled. Thus, it appears that the sentenced person will serve the sentence in the closed regime for a longer time than the one actually owed, thus hurting the progressiveness of the sentence and, consequently, causing an increase in the prison population of the closed regime. The conclusion is that the decision setting the base date as the day of the conviction's last arrest is the one most compatible with the guarantor model of Luigi Ferrajoli and with the purpose of resuscializing the sentence and also contributing to a public policy of emptying the prison population of the closed regime.