A emancipação insuficiente da pessoa com deficiência. Diagnóstico Jurídico. Paradigma de ancoragem e o desafio da geração de intérpretes.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2017
Autor(a) principal: Bernardes, Luana Ferreira
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
Brasil
Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/22428
http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/ufu.di.2018.965
Resumo: The present study aims at analyzing the niches of protective inadequacy that surround the emancipatory technique provided to people with psychic and intellectual deficiency by the advent of the Statute for Persons with Disabilities (EPD), as the result of the reformulation of the original legal incapacity regime of the Civil Code of 2002 (CC/02). In order to achieve the guidelines of independence and moral autonomy, as enshrined in the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CDPD), as well as to guarantee the equal exercise of the rights and of the fundamental freedoms of the disabled person, the statutory law excluded the original incapacity regime. This regime sent people with mental and intellectual deficiency to the glass dome of the partial guardianship and established the presumption of full civil capacity. Although the emancipation, by means of legal capacity, is commendable to the free development of the subjective existential situations of the human person, it was carried out in an inconsequential and insufficient way. Without fixing the related protective obligations to the concrete vulnerability of the person with mental and intellectual disability as a subject of rights capable in the patrimonial sphere. Therefore, by means of bibliographical and documentary research and of the adoption of a deductive methodological procedure, this paper will attempt to demonstrate the damages that the incidence in insufficient protection, caused by the emancipation without precautions and own safeguards, can cause to the dignity and to the rights of persons with disabilities. At the end of the discussion, the legislative omission will be resolved through hermeneutical criteria, especially the dialogue of sources as an instrument for the protection of the vulnerable.