Registro: análise crítica do processo administrativo federal de tutela do patrimônio cultural imaterial brasileiro

• Ano de defesa: 2012
• Autor(a) principal: Machado, Beatriz Auxiliadora Rezende
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Uberlândia; BR; Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito; Ciências Sociais Aplicadas; UFU
• Palavras-chave em Português: Registro; Processo administrativo; Cultura; Culture; Administrative process; Process of registry; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/13194; https://doi.org/10.14393/ufu.di.2012.327

In response to protect the constitutionally guaranteed access, production and preservation of their intangible cultural heritage, and given the dictates of international realization of the fundamental right to culture, Union has structured administrative process of registry, which decision-making and actions set within the sphere of duties of IPHAN. The present research result is versed in the procedural framework of comparison of the registration process, governed primarily by the Federal Decree nº. 3551/2000 and Resolution nº. 01/2006/IPHAN, with the archetype of administrative due process imposed by Constitution and mainly by the Federal Law n.º 9.784/99. Its methodological structuring occurs by deductive research on national bibliographic, parallel to the comparative study for content analysis of the legal instruments listed. Just verified its terms with the aim of making them compatible with the opening acts for participation in decision-making, contradictory principle and the formation of multiple administrative appeal instances, it s noted that the ordinary law exceeds the subsidiarity, to justify multiple procedural acts distinct by the procedure originally proposed, such as the extension of its legitimating role, mitigation of the rigor of pre-formed evidence, prior intimation than extinctive acts, sealing the illegal evidence, conducting public hearings and consultations and implementation of appellate proceedings. Thereby, procedural practices are made conformable to achieve the proposed constitutional treatment aimed to protect transindividual heritage.