Adolescentes em conflito com a lei e adolescentes escolares: suas trajetórias, intersecções e distanciamentos
Ano de defesa: | 2020 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Link de acesso: | https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=10387174 https://hdl.handle.net/11600/64720 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify, analyze, and relate the profiles of adolescents in conflict with the law (ACL) and school teenagers (AE) on the indicators: school trajectory, quality of life, use of psychoactive substances, resilience, and anger. METHODS: The profiles of 474 adolescents, 203 adolescents institutionalized in Fundação CASA (ACL) and 271 adolescents from state public schools (AE), aged 12 to 21, and were analyzed. The instruments used were a Sociodemographic Questionnaire and a School Trajectory, DUSI - Drug Use Screening Inventory, STAXI - Anger Expression Inventory as a Trait and State, Resilience Scale and WHOQOL-bref. RESULTS: The groups showed differences in family configuration, highlighting the predominance of single-parent families ACL (63%) and AE (34.3%); lag and conflicting relationships were identified in the school ACL’s context, the use of psychoactive substances was also more frequent in this group; however the AE group showed a discrepancy between substance use behavior and related problems. There was a difference regarding the psychoactive substances in which they showed evidence of ACL dependence: marijuana, 73%; alcohol, 48% and tobacco, 44%; AE: alcohol, 32%; tobacco, 12% and marijuana, 10%. On the STAXI scales, ACL had higher scores for State and Trait of Anger, Anger out and in with statistically significant differences. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding the measurement of Resilience. In the WHOQOL-bref AE showed greater satisfaction regarding the general quality of life, while ACL showed greater satisfaction with their health, between the domains there were differences between the groups in DOM4 - Environment (AE: 60.6 ± SD 15.2; ACL: 57.7 ± SD 15.3) and DOM2 - Psychological (AE: 63.6 ± SD19.4; ACL 69.7 ± SD 16.3). In the binary logistic regression, the results showed that the scores of the instruments WHOQOL-bref, DOM1 - Physical and DOM2 - Psychological, DUSI - Area 1 and STAXI - Anger status increase the chances of belonging to the ACL group, while the odds reasons for belonging to the AE group were associated with the highest Resilience scores, WHOQOL-bref at DOM4 - Environment and STAXI – Temperament. CONCLUSION: It is understood that family and school must be invested in public policies that help them to configure in fact the important protective factors that they represent to overcome the vulnerabilities of adolescents and the risk factors of these contexts. |