As classes sociais no Brasil: a dinâmica do conceito durante os governos do PT (2003-2013)
Ano de defesa: | 2017 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Link de acesso: | https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=5435286 https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/50740 |
Resumo: | The present dissertation essay has as its critical analysis object the ongoing debate concerning the theoretical formulations about the brazilian social classes concepts. These dispute has been formed through the analysis of the conjectural elements regarding multiple factors, such as: the employment formalization, the growth of specific positions in the labour market, the rise in minimum wage, the broadening of the lower classes access to credit, the increase of the income mainly due social security or income distribuition policies (like the governamental program Bolsa Família), the expansion of access in superior education courses and the enlargement of brazilian PIB during the presidential terms of PT between 2003 and 2013. Our mainly approach, as concerning the dynamics of the social classes concepts in Brazil during the forementioned period, is to elaborate a critical analysis of the thesis that choose to situate the social classes inside a particular social sphere, in spite of characterizing they for their (and in their) multiple determinations. To achieve that, we depart from the designation that Pochmann (2012;2014), Singer (2012) and Souza (2012), authors who summarised the debate, restricted the conceptual characterization of the working class to the fields of echonomics, political-ideological and culture, respectively. |