Deleuze e a filosofia de Maïmon

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2020
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, Matheus Barbosa [UNIFESP]
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=9740923
https://hdl.handle.net/11600/64630
Resumo: Initially, the hypothesis we followed is that the problem of genesis precedes and conditions Deleuze's gaze on Kant, expressly that formulated by Maïmon. We argue, then, that the alliance between the two is justified for two main reasons. Firstly, it fulfills a strategic function: Deleuze returns to Maïmon´s problems that generated the post-Kantian tradition at the beginning, but to formulate alternative solutions to German idealism through a set of its own allies. Second, we try to demonstrate how Deleuze's option inscribes his reading of Kant in the culture of his time, mainly because of the influence of Gueroult's writings on him. Based on Difference and repetition (1968) and from the genetic requirements, we approach the ambiguities of Kantism, pointing out how the criticism of Kant fulfills a programmatic function, because in the ambiguity attributed to the Kantian theses of Cogito, Time and Idea, at the same time Deleuze establishes the coordinates of the problem that will guide his return to transcendental philosophy. Finally, we introduce Deleuze's break with Kant's philosophy. Based on the triple layer of questions developed in previous moments (the problem of genesis, the French debate around it and the ambiguities of Kantism), it is necessary to highlight the role of Maïmon in the search for a new regime of foundation, especially in that concerns the differential genesis of sensation. With the concept of transcendental empiricism, Deleuze brings the Ideas of Maïmon's infinite understanding back to the realm empiricist of the real experience.