Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2011 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Tenório, Josceli Maria [UNIFESP] |
Orientador(a): |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/8958
|
Resumo: |
Introduction: the diagnosing of celiac disease involves some complexity due to its multiple symptoms, signs, risk groups, presentation and the wide possibility of differential diagnosis. In order to confirm the diagnosis of celiac disease, it is required to perform the biopsy or the small intestine, the gold standard. Objective: to develop a decision making support system, in web environment, including an automated classifier to recognize cases of celiac disease, to be previously selected among experimental models drawing upon techniques of artificial intelligence. Methods: a web system was implemented to support an electronic protocol designed to help with celiac disease investigation and collect clinical data. A preliminary assessment of this system usability was performed through the analysis of a questionnaire based on the System Usability Scale (SUS) completed by 10 direct users of the web system implemented. A retrospective database with 178 cases was build for training the automated classifier. A total of 270 automated classifiers available in the software Weka 3.6.1 were tested using 5 artificial intelligence techniques – decision tree, K-nearest-neighbor, Bayesian classifier, support vector machine and artificial neural networks. The parameters area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and correctness rate were used, in the order above, as criteria to select the classification algorithm to be implemented in the web system. The algorithm with the largest AUC was included in the web system whose software was named SADCEL. A database with 38 clinical cases was built to assess the diagnostic power this software. The diagnostic hypothesis obtained from SADCEL was compared with those reached by the specialists participating in the study using Kappa Statistic. Results: the preliminary usability score attained by the web system was 83.5 ± 10.0 (excellent). The Bayesian classifying algorithm AODE F1 had the best performance scoring 80.0% for correctness, 0.78 for sensitivity, 0.84 for specificity and 0.84 for AUC. Compared with the study gold standard, SADCEL achieved an accuracy of 84.2% with a level of agreement with the diagnostic gold standard rated as k = 0.68 (p-value < 0.0001), indicative of good level of agreement. The level of agreement between the specialist diagnostic hypothesis and the diagnostic gold standard was rated as k = 0.64 (p-value < 0.0001). The agreement between the specialist and SADCEL diagnostic hypotheses was rated as k = 0.46 (p-value) indicative of moderate level of agreement. Conclusion: the level of accuracy attained by the classifying algorithm incorporated in this study´s web system evidences the potential usefulness of SADCEL in helping with diagnosing celiac disease in clinical set. This study is, thus, expected to be a contribution towards the establishing of a computational means of diagnosing the celiac disease. |