Fotocoagulação de acordo com o protocolo ETDRS modificado versus laser diodo sublimiar em micropulsos para tratamento de edema macular diabético: Ensaio clínico-comparativo

• Ano de defesa: 2011
• Autor(a) principal: Lavinsky, Daniel [UNIFESP]
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
• Palavras-chave em Português: Edema macular; Fotocoagulação; Lasers semicondutores/uso terapêutico; Retinopatia diabética/terapia; Ensaio clínico controlado aleatório; Método duplo-cego; Humanos; Light coagulation; Macular edema; Humans; Double-blind method; Randomized controlled trial; Diabetic retinopathy/therapy; Lasers, semiconductor/therapeutic use
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/9659

Purpose: To compare modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) focal/grid laser photocoagulation with normal-density (ND-SDM) or high-density (HD-SDM) subthreshold diode-laser micropulse photocoagulation for the treatment diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-masked clinical trial with patients with previously untreated DME and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) worse than 20/40 and better than 20/400. Patients were randomized to receive either modified ETDRS focal / grid photocoagulation (42 patients), ND-SDM (39 patients) or HD-SDM (42 patients). Before treatment and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment, all patients underwent ophthalmic examinations, BCVA, color fundus photography, fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Results: At 12 months, the HD-SDM group had the best improvement in BCVA (0.25 logMAR), followed by the modified ETDRS group (0.08 logMAR), while no improvements were seen in the ND-SDM group (0.03 logMAR). All groups showed statistically significant progressive reduction of CMT throughout the study (p<0.001). The HD-SDM group exhibited the greatest CMT reduction (154 μm), which was not significantly different from that of the modified ETDRS group (126 μm; p=0.75). Conclusions: At 1 year, the clinical performance of HD-SDM was superior to that of the modified ETDRS photocoagulation technique based on the anatomic and functional measures of improvement used in this investigation. A rationale for this treatment modality as a preferable approach is suggested, and the precise role of sub-threshold micropulse laser treatment may become more defined as experience grows, guided by optimized treatment guidelines and more comprehensive trials.