Indissociabilidades - conflitos epistêmicos na emergência de uma ciência agroecológica

• Ano de defesa: 2019
• Autor(a) principal: Meira, Juliana De Andrade [UNIFESP]
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
• Palavras-chave em Português: Agroecology; Indissociability; Science; Interdisciplinarity And Co-Production; Interdisciplinaridade E Co-Produção; Agroecologia; Indissociabilidade; Ciência
• Link de acesso: https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=7882987; https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/59145

Circumscribed in the Sociology of Science and Technology area, the work analyzes the brazilian agroecology process of institutionalization, through the notion of Indissociability between Science, Moviment and Practice, that emerged in the last years, showing to be a way to approach agroecology from the proposal to represent other disciplinar configurations, allowed to connect science and society in other ways. Therefore, will be observed: I. The speeches of the main agroecology authors in the world, that remain as the most cited ; II. The link between agroecology and general environmental movements, giving some special attention to the social construction of risks of agricultural science activities; III. The mapping of social actors, as they articulate themselves; and IV. A view of scientific contribution about (or in) agroecology, considering two important academic platforms: CAPES and SCIELO bases. From that, the agroecological dynamics are observed using the Science and technology Studies (STS), and especially the concept of co-production, here from Tim Forsyth and Sheila Jasanoff, in the way they work to explain the environmental political activism. Thereby, some possibilities to think about agroecology are rehearsed, considering the movements of the conceptual and cognition devices, between social, politic and scientific dimensions. The conclusions revolve around some hypotheses, one of them comprises scientific agroecology from your multiple connections with society, among them, the constitution of some of the postgraduate programs presented, in the way they open themselves to think about modern and contemporary agricultural activity contradictions, from interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity. They can be taken as “reflexivity centers”, which are legitimized by the way they point out answers to complex socio-environmental problems.