Condutas de criação na proposta musicopedagógica CDG - Cante e dance com a gente
Ano de defesa: | 2014 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
BR Educação UFSM Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Link de acesso: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/7104 |
Resumo: | This dissertation questioned if a particular proposal for music education, the Proposal Musicpedagogical CDG Sing and Dance with Us, could be considered a pedagogical poetics, of artistic creation in and for school. In order to achieve this aim, the research began characterizing CDG from documents produced by and about it. At the same time, a study about poetics from the thought of Paul Valéry e René Passeron was carried out. The authors cited served as theoretical and methodological lenses through which I meant to amplify CDG, in order to demonstrate how a pedagogical proposal can be understood as a poetics; this claim did not aim to restrict CDG to art teaching, but the actual production of art. The poetics, as presented here, is: poïein (VALÉRY , 2011), a do that leads to a process of creation; poiesis (PASSERON, 1997), the study of creative behavior; poiesis (CASTRO, 2004), when studied from outside the metaphysical field, essence of acting, inseparable from the concept of physis (incessant arise) and ethos (the act as a sense of being); the poíesis (AGAMBEN, 2012), while production in the presence, of something that cross the not going to be to the to be. Therefore, in order to demonstrate how the CDG constitutes a poetics, the conducts of creation in the proposal, through the analysis of an article written by the author of the CDG and a report of the author of the dissertation, both related to experiences of creation were studied. The conclusion was that the conduct of creation guided by CDG has always a collective development and is an open work of art; that in the process of creating the work, each person involved also creates a self, able to take responsibility for the success of them all and the work. The work in this context is the result of willingness and possibilities of each individual and the group. |