Comunalidade na liquidez: evidências no mercado brasileiro

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2011
Autor(a) principal: Casarin, Fernando
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
BR
Administração
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/4593
Resumo: This study aimed to verify the existence of commonality in liquidity in the Brazilian market by delivering common factors of liquidity with an innovative technique (dynamic factor analysis). Also sought to examine the relationship between commonality and return on individual assets. Most studies of commonality are proceeded with data analysis and worked out daily in developed markets like the United States (Chord, Roll and Subrahmanyam (2000) Huberman and Halka (1999), Hasbrouck and Seppi (2001), Henker and Martens (2003 ), Lee (2005) and Brockman, Chung and Perignon (2009)), but some use intraday data on the formation of the sample and, moreover, show the commonality in emerging markets. Brockman and Chung (2002), Zheng and Zhang (2006), and Giouvris Galariotis (2008) are examples of studies in these markets, using a variety of measures and different methodological approaches. There were no Brazilian studies involving the commonality, but a study of foreign Brockman, Chung and Perignon (2009) reported weak evidence in Brazil. The procedure adopted for estimating the dynamic factor analysis (DFA) was based on a study of Frederic (2006) using the software Stata version 11. This survey was conducted with the shares belonging to the Bovespa index (Bovespa) from intraday data every five minute interval in the period from January 4 until April 30, 2010, total assets of 63 theoretical portfolio of first quarter 2010. Due to the limitation of the software, the sample was divided into three groups (group 1, 2 and 3), each composed of 21 companies with 498 5 minute intervals during periods of 83 observations for each trading day, the day 01/04/2010 until 01/11/2010 generating a total of 10,458 observations for each group. Common factors were found from the liquidity variables, which explain in part the common variation in liquidity. After analyzing the factors we proceeded to estimate the regressions by group. For each group had three regressions, only the first return of Ibovespa regressing against the return of the asset. Then we included a factor for liquidity and, after all factors were included in the model. Among the results of the regressions, the Group 1 stands out, presented the highest coefficient of determination and where the Bovespa index return and Factor 1 were significant, indicating that beyond the market beta the common factor in liquidity also produces impacts on return the company. This study showed that there is commonality in liquidity in the market and also that there is influence of liquidity in the return of individual assets, confirming the evidence found by Brockman, Chung and Perignon (2009).