Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2018 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Melo, Cristinne Andrade |
Orientador(a): |
Takeshita, Wilton Mitsunari |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Pós-Graduação em Odontologia
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/13145
|
Resumo: |
Background: Mobile devices facilitate access to patient data and can be used to visualize radiographs, eliminating the need for lengthy paper records and facilitating access by dental surgeons to radiographs. Aim: Evaluate the accuracy diagnostic of interproximal digital radiography with caries lesions seen on tablets and smartphones. Materials and Methods: Sixty interproximal digital radiographs were selected, which had radiographic images of carious lesions on posterior teeth, selected from extension project: PJ025-2016 "Service for patients with care specialized radiographic examinations" Department of Dentitstry of the Federal University of Sergipe – UFS. For the acquisition of the images, a zero-sized phosphor plate sensor (active area 20 x 30 mm) of the iExpress® digital system (Instrumentarium, Tuusula Finland) was used, with spatial resolution 14.3 pl / mm, with positioner for technique radiographic examination. The radiographic images were selected by consensus between two radiologists with 15 and 30 years of experience, and later analyzed in a LCD monitor Pavilion dm1 (HP, Palo Alto, Califórnia, EUA), two smartphones: Iphone 6S (Apple, California, USA) and Samsung Galaxy Gran 2 (DUOS) (Samsung, Seoul, Korea of the South), and two tablets: Ipad (Apple, California, USA) and Samsung Galaxy Tab (Samsung, Seoul, South Korea). Results: Kappa values (Kw) determined that the evaluator 1 presented almost perfect agreement for all the devices, whereas the evaluator 2 presented substantial agreement for all the devices. The values of the area below the ROC (Az) curve for LCD monitor (0.948), the IOS Smartphone (0.944), Android Smartphone (0.916), IOS Tablet (0.949) and Android Tablet (0.950) showed similar accuracy and did not present statistically significant differences (≤ 0.05). Conclusion: The displays studied has a similar accuracy and can be used to evaluate digital radiographs without altering diagnostic capacity. |