Uma luz no fim do túnel: o PIBID como possibilidade de melhoria da formação inicial de professores no curso de licenciatura em Química da Universidade Federal de Sergipe/campus de São Cristóvão

• Ano de defesa: 2018
• Autor(a) principal: Lima, João Paulo Mendonça
• Orientador(a): Silva, Veleida Anahí da
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Pós-Graduação em Educação
• Palavras-chave em Português: Ensino superior; Ensino de química; Formação de professores; Professores de química; Estudantes de química; Programa Institucional de Bolsas de Iniciação à Docência (PIBID); Formação inicial de professores
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Initial training of teachers; Chemistry teacher
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
• Link de acesso: http://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/10668

The main objective of the research was to investigate the role of PIBID (Brazilian Institutional Scholarship Program for Teaching Initiation) in the Chemistry Licensure program at the Federal University of Sergipe, Campus São Cristóvão, in the grantees' training. The defended Thesis is that the participation in PIBID improves the initial training of the grantees while reaffirms their interest for teaching and extends the permanence and conclusion in the course, diminishing evasion. The methodological course involved the analysis of the following documents: Resolution 202/2009 of the Education, Research and Extension Council CONEPE (SERGIPE, 2009), which presents the Pedagogical-Political Project of the course; subproject of the PIBID/Chemistry approved in proclamation CAPES 061/2013 (BRAZIL, 2013); the reports sent by the grantees to the coordination concerning the activities developed between March and December of 2014, as well as during all the year of 2015; and reports of entrants and graduating gotten through Integrated System of Academic Activities (SIGAA) of the Federal University of Sergipe. In addition, the methodological course also involved a semi structuralized and collective interview. The results of the analysis of permanence, evasion, conclusion and formation in the regular stated period for the group of the grantees are more positive compared to the group of students who had not participated in the program. PIBID group achieves percentages of formation in the regular stated period of up to 48,28%, while the non-PIBID group analyzed does not reach at an annual average of 14% (Table 10). Moreover, the conclusion taxes for grantees are approximately 70%, and evasion taxes are only 15%. For the non-grantee group, the best indicators of conclusion reach just over 40%. However, year after year, this percentage diminished, arriving at less than 10% in some periods. The evasion is bigger, reaching more than 80% for the students who had entered in the course in the year of 2010, for example. The affirmations presented in the reports and the interviews show the positive marks of the PIBID. The program was identified as important for public politics in the support to the formative process that occurs in the licensure. Being part of the program contributed to extend the contact of the grantees with activities in the schools; with the production and application of textbooks; with the reflection on the actions; and with the accomplishment of research on education. PIBID provoked a different atmosphere in the course, as its actions put into motion the licensure with the accomplishment of events, integrating activities between university-school, teachers and students of the course and teachers of the basic education. In addition, it contributes to the construction of knowledge about teaching. The improvement of the academic formation occurs when the grantees become more involved themselves with the university, which is related to the activities carried through the subproject and the received financial support through the scholarship. The theoretical and practical learning is constant and fortify the performance in discipline of the graduation, in the activities of Supervised Period of training, the production of the Final Paper and in the access the Post-graduation. The qualitative rise of the formation occurs not because the program is salvationist, but, especially for producing the permanence of the grantees in the university and in their future work.