A construção do sujeito da escrita em instrumentos linguísticos : gramático x linguista

• Ano de defesa: 2018
• Autor(a) principal: Feitosa, Edilene Oliveira da Silva
• Orientador(a): Bernardo-Santos, Wilton James
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Pós-Graduação em Letras
• Palavras-chave em Português: Análise do discurso; Escrita; História das ideias linguísticas; Sujeito; Discourse analysis
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Writing; History of linguistic ideas; Subject
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES
• Link de acesso: http://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/8178

In this paper, we analyze discourses present in language instruments, as official writing manuals, teaching materials, journalistic and in order to understand the Constitution of the subject of writing in these instruments, considering the historical and ideological discursividades that affect them: the Grammatical nomenclature Brazilian deployment (NGB, 1959) and the process of democratization, with the introduction of new documents for teaching as the National curricular parameters (PCN, 1997). To this end, we use as theoretical frameworks, texts of Pêcheux (1990; 1983) and E. Orlandi (2012; 2009; 2008; 2000; 1999) contemplating the principles of AD; to Auroux (1992; 1998), about the history of linguistic ideas, writing, gramatização; Guimaraes (1996) on the gramatização in Brazil. Besides the work of Authier-Revuz (1990), concerning the heterogeneity may include, among others. The object of interest are the positions occupied by the subject of writing, are the discourses into service in selected parts in these instruments: covers, cover pages, summaries, presentations, ears, notes, introductions. In this sense, we organize the work methodology as proposed analytical principles of AD, proposed by Pêcheux (1990) and Orlandi (2012). The analyses and discussions led us to understand various ideological positions and clashes, exterioridades essay that affect the subject and does work well of the place (position) of traditional Grammarian, now the place of linguist, now the religious, legal, now of the politician. The analysis pointed also to the subject of writing entered into divisions marked between grammatical traditionalism and the linguist fundamentally. We understand that interdiscursividades from different production conditions, sometimes mutually exclusive, well maintain, now oppose. Thus, the subject of writing is mainly divided into subject of gramatização/traditional grammarian and of Linguistics.