Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2010 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Moura Junior, Emanuel Messias Barboza
 |
Orientador(a): |
Netto, Antenor de Oliveira Aguiar
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Sergipe
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Pós-Graduação em Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/4128
|
Resumo: |
This research addresses the environmental conflicts occurring in the watershed area of the Sergipe river that turned into lawsuits reported by the Department of Justice and included in the category of environmental crimes to Law 9605/1998, between the years 1998/2008. The study started with a database provided by the Court of Justice which is numbered the Judicial proceedings on the homepage address registered in the Court of Justice as falling into the river watershed Sergipe. The literature review sought to justify the conflict, the nature and social struggles man, society, environment hallmark of Western society. In the midst of a literature review, as a matter of background, is treated as a modern political-historical moment foundational for this transformation that led to man´s relationship with nature different from previous seasons. In the methodological aspect, the study examined the numbers and proceedings, a following-up, class action and legal basis, characteristics of the crime, profile of those involved in the action, Parquet (author), Judge (a) and Defendant, scope of action , county and jurisdiction, procedure, time, decision and environmental impact. It was found that the central issues brought to the Judiciary are restricted to localities issues involved in the conflicts, has little direct impact on the watershed, originate, as a rule, the activity performed by the defendant in his normal working day. It is also the major issues involving state conglomerates with major impacts in the watershed are not subject to actions for environmental crimes. |