Da fala egocêntrica como fenômeno argumentativo e problematológico

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2024
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Jameson Thiago Farias
Orientador(a): Azevedo, Isabel Cristina Michelan de
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Pós-Graduação em Letras
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/20035
Resumo: The research presented in this doctoral qualification text aims to evaluate the conditions of possibility of a reading of the phenomenon of egocentric speech - as defined by Lev Vigotski - as an argumentative and problematological phenomenon, although mobilized by a single empirical speaker. The investigation was based on the assumption that not only the enunciation is polyphonic, but also the psychological activity involved in the speech act. In this sense, language would be an instrument of thought and the problem of the thought-language relationship is the problem of considering certain modalities of concrete discourse, named egocentric, as tools for posing problems and forwarding them. Therefore, starting from an articulation of vigotskian concepts with the field of pragmatics and from a conception of the psychological clinic as an egocentric speech setting, the analysis of specific fragments of three therapeutic sessions was carried out, considering the egocentric function of the analysands' locutions - that is, the argumentative conversation analyzed did not take place between analyst and analysand, but between the various enunciators present in the analysand's egocentric speech. The study was fundamentally based on theoretical and methodological assumptions of Michel Meyer's Problematology, especially in the different relations of the utterances with the interrogativeness formulated by the author and in his argumentative triptych: dialectical, pragmatic and communicative statements. The results provide support for both a better understanding of the linguistic, monologue phenomenon of egocentric speech, and the egocentric, problematizing functions of discourse. Egocentric speech, based on the cases analyzed, presents itself as a monologue, but dialogical, statement, as it is argumentative and pragmatic – that is, the argumentativeness present in egocentric speech does not aim to establish an agreement between different points of view, but the concrete, aesthetic characterization of what is out-of-question.