Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2024 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Silva, Jameson Thiago Farias |
Orientador(a): |
Azevedo, Isabel Cristina Michelan de |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Pós-Graduação em Letras
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/20035
|
Resumo: |
The research presented in this doctoral qualification text aims to evaluate the conditions of possibility of a reading of the phenomenon of egocentric speech - as defined by Lev Vigotski - as an argumentative and problematological phenomenon, although mobilized by a single empirical speaker. The investigation was based on the assumption that not only the enunciation is polyphonic, but also the psychological activity involved in the speech act. In this sense, language would be an instrument of thought and the problem of the thought-language relationship is the problem of considering certain modalities of concrete discourse, named egocentric, as tools for posing problems and forwarding them. Therefore, starting from an articulation of vigotskian concepts with the field of pragmatics and from a conception of the psychological clinic as an egocentric speech setting, the analysis of specific fragments of three therapeutic sessions was carried out, considering the egocentric function of the analysands' locutions - that is, the argumentative conversation analyzed did not take place between analyst and analysand, but between the various enunciators present in the analysand's egocentric speech. The study was fundamentally based on theoretical and methodological assumptions of Michel Meyer's Problematology, especially in the different relations of the utterances with the interrogativeness formulated by the author and in his argumentative triptych: dialectical, pragmatic and communicative statements. The results provide support for both a better understanding of the linguistic, monologue phenomenon of egocentric speech, and the egocentric, problematizing functions of discourse. Egocentric speech, based on the cases analyzed, presents itself as a monologue, but dialogical, statement, as it is argumentative and pragmatic – that is, the argumentativeness present in egocentric speech does not aim to establish an agreement between different points of view, but the concrete, aesthetic characterization of what is out-of-question. |