Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2015 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Souza, Milena Cristina Aragão Ribeiro de
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Freitas, Anamaria Gonçalves Bueno de
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Sergipe
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Pós-Graduação em Educação
|
| Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/4609
|
Resumo: |
This Doctoral Thesis was to object school punishment and the objective, set out to investigate the construction of practices and representations ten teachers of the first grades of elementary school, graduated in pedagogy between the decades from 1970 to 2014, about the punishments used in the classroom. The methodological approach used was based on the thematic oral history, supported the works of Alberti (2003); Ferreira and Beloved (2006); and Portelli (2006). The treatment of the interviews was conducted by discursive textual analysis of Roque Moraes (2007). This research is theoretically centered on Pierre Bourdieu, especially the concepts of habitus and field; as well as Roger Chartier, with the concepts of practices, representations and ownership; and other authors able to move through the frames of relationships and socio-cultural tensions; practices and representations of ordinary subjects, interrogating the plurality of daily life, ways of thinking, saying and doing of the subjects that make up the school. Before the appointed path, bring forth the thesis that I advocate in relation to school punishment: the incorporation of punishment in professional teaching practice is intertwined with the history of life, especially with the knowledge learned in childhood (through family and school ) and is naturalized in the actions and having little to do with the training courses, which makes your choice is not based on knowledge and pedagogy knowledge. As a result, it was observed that the teachers surveyed say they use different types of punishment in the classroom, emphasizing the moral punishment, but reported the use of physical punishment in their history of school life as well as in the practice of their colleagues. For them, the punishment has the disciplinary function in the Kantian sense, ie make good citizens for life in society. Said, still believe that the choice of punishments to be used in class is related to the family and school experiences and not to formal learning. The Status of Children and Adolescents was mentioned as an important law, however, was seen in an ambiguous manner, that is, on the one hand positively contributed to cause the decrease in corporal punishment, also damaged the teaching action, in that " removed the authority of the teacher. " The thesis was completed suggesting possibilities of action in view of continuing education in order to deal with the punishment from a pedagogical perspective. I note that investigate the construction of teacher practices and representations on school punishments, culminating in a denaturalization process of a trivial action in the educational universe, allowing thinking ahead possibilities of action to this subject; and stimulates reflection on the importance of maintaining a look at teaching in regard to its social, cultural, historical and subjective, since they are working in mediation and construction of the teaching-learning process. |
