A inconstitucionalidade da internação involuntária de pessoas acometidas de transtorno mental : um avanço na luta antimanicomial no Brasil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2022
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho Neto, Wolney Maciel de
Orientador(a): Dias, Clara Angélica Gonçalves Cavalcanti
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Pós-Graduação em Direito
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/15567
Resumo: The present essay deals with the involuntary hospitalization of people suffering from a mental disorder, a measure that do not respect the consent of the hospitalized individual regarding the applied procedure. The main objective of this dissertation is to analyze the unconstitutionality of involuntary hospitalization. The specific objectives are: to identify the terminologies, vulnerabilities, through the legislation perspective, and the recognition of people with mental disorders.; to draw contributions on psychiatric reform and the antiasylum struggle; and, finally, to explain the impasses of involuntary hospitalization based on national and international legislation. In tune with this investigative purpose, the research aimed specifically at discussing how the involuntary internment process affects the people submitted to it; and to that end, it dedicated to examining the hypervulnerability of people with mental disorders, through constitutional principles. In order to carry out the work, a quantitative methodology was used based on a bibliographic and documentary review with contributions from Law, Philosophy, Sociology and Health sciences, as well as a descriptive analysis. In this sense, the hypothesis is verified and it is concluded that involuntary hospitalization is unconstitutional.